ABSTRACT
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the comparative effectiveness of ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for the treatment of major depressive episodes (MDEs). PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ketamine and ECT for MDE. The primary outcome was response rate, for which we prespecified a non-inferiority margin of -0.1, based on the largest and most recent RCT. Response was defined as a reduction of at least 50 % in the depression scale score. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising 655 patients. In the overall population, ketamine was not non-inferior to ECT in response rate (RD -0.10; 95 % CI -0.26 to 0.05; p = 0.198; I2 = 72 %). The ECT group had a higher reduction in depression scores, but without difference in remission and relapse rates. Regarding safety outcomes, ketamine had better posttreatment cognition scores and reduced muscle pain rate compared with ECT, albeit with an increased rate of dissociative symptoms. In a subanalysis with only inpatients, ketamine was inferior to ECT in response rate (RD -0.15; 95 % CI -0.27 to -0.03; p = 0.014; I2 = 25 %), remission, and change in depression scores. These findings support the use of ECT over ketamine for inpatients. Further RCTs are warranted to clarify the comparative effect of these treatments for outpatients.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Electroconvulsive Therapy , Ketamine , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Humans , Electroconvulsive Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been showing promising effects for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there is still no conclusion on its efficacy for this disorder. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials using tDCS for OCD and a computer modeling analysis to evaluate the electric field (EF) strengths of different electrode assemblies in brain regions of interest (ROIs) (PROSPERO-42021262465). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 25 September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies were included. The primary aim was the effect size (Hedges' g) of continuous outcomes and potential moderators of response. For EF modeling, SimNIBS software was used. Four RCTs and four open-label trials were included (n = 241). Results revealed a large effect of tDCS in the endpoint, but no significant effect between active and sham protocols. No predictor of response was found. EF analysis revealed that montages using the main electrode over the (pre)supplementary motor area with an extracephalic reference electrode might lead to stronger EFs in the predefined ROIs. Our results revealed that tDCS might be a promising intervention to treat OCD; however, larger studies are warranted.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: The absence of a positive diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in immunization stress-related response (ISRR) clusters may have not only a direct impact on affected patients' health but may also reduce compliance to national vaccination programs. It is therefore crucial to develop efficient diagnostic tools and a feasible proposal for proper communication and treatment of ISRR. PURPOSE: To explore the psychogenic nature of patients' convulsive seizures in a suspected outbreak of an ISRR cluster following human papillomavirus vaccination in Rio Branco, Brazil. METHODS: Twelve patients with convulsive seizures were submitted to prolonged intensive video-electroencephalography monitoring, brain magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic testing, laboratory subsidiary examinations, and complete neurological and psychiatric evaluations. RESULTS: Ten patients received the positive diagnosis of PNES, and two patients received the diagnosis of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. No biological association was found between the HPV vaccine and the clinical problems presented by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged VEEG monitoring can contribute significantly to the positive diagnosis of PNES in ISRR clusters and to avoid hesitancy to vaccinate.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Brazil , Electroencephalography , Humans , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/epidemiology , Seizures/etiology , Vaccination , Video RecordingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mixed-specifier mood disorders are probably a different subgroup in terms of response to treatment, socio-demographic parameters, course, and family history. Here we describe the rationale and design of a clinical trial aimed to test the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a non-pharmacological treatment known as theta-burst stimulation (TBS) for treating the mixed depressive episodes of both bipolar (I or II), and unipolar depression. METHODS: The study is designed as a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial evaluating TBS for the treatment of moderate or severe major depressive episodes with mixed features of patients receiving at least one first or second-line pharmacological treatment for depressive episodes without adequate response. Ninety adult (18 to 65 years old) patients will be enrolled and submitted to 6-week (comprising 5 consecutive days a week sessions for the first 3 weeks and then 2 days a week for a further 3 week) of inhibitory followed by excitatory TBS in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants will be assessed using clinical and neuropsychological tests before and after the intervention. The primary outcome is change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS) score over time and across groups. Cognitive parameters will also be assessed with neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: The clinical results will provide evidence about TBS as an adjunctive treatment for mixed depression treatment and neuropsychological parameters will contribute toward an improved understanding the effects of TBS in cognition. CONCLUSION: Our results could introduce a novel therapeutic technique for mixed depressive episodes of both bipolar and unipolar disorders. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04123301; date of registration: 10/10/2019; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04123301?term=NCT04123301&rank=1.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Negative symptoms represent a substantial burden in schizophrenia. Although preliminary studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective for some clusters of symptoms, the clinical benefits for negative symptoms are unclear. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of tDCS vs sham as an add-on treatment for patients with schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: The double-blind Schizophrenia Treatment With Electric Transcranial Stimulation (STARTS) randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 2014 to March 2018 in 2 outpatient clinics in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Patients with schizophrenia with stable negative and positive symptoms and a minimum score of 20 points in the negative symptoms subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were included. Interventions: Ten sessions of tDCS performed twice a day for 5 days or a sham procedure. The anode and the cathode were positioned over the left prefrontal cortex and the left temporoparietal junction, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in the PANSS negative symptoms subscale score at week 6 was the primary outcome. Patients were followed-up for an additional 6 weeks. Results: Of the 100 included patients, 20 (20.0%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 35.3 (9.3) years. A total of 95 patients (95.0%) finished the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, patients receiving active tDCS showed a significantly greater improvement in PANSS score compared with those receiving the sham procedure (difference, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.51-3.79; number needed to treat, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.12-6.99; P < .001). Response rates for negative symptoms (20% improvement or greater) were also higher in the active group (20 of 50 [40%]) vs the sham group (2 of 50 [4%]) (P < .001). These effects persisted at follow-up. Transcranial direct current stimulation was well tolerated, and adverse effects did not differ between groups, except for burning sensation over the scalp in the active group (43.8%) vs the sham group (14.3%) (P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: Transcranial direct current stimulation was effective and safe in ameliorating negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02535676.
Subject(s)
Schizophrenia/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenic Psychology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Schizophrenia is a disorder associated with cortical inhibition deficits. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces changes in cortical excitability in healthy subjects and individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders depending on the stimulation parameters. Our aim was to investigate whether a previously published tDCS protocol associated with symptomatic improvement in schizophrenia would induce changes in motor cortical excitability, assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigms, i.e., short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intra-cortical facilitation (ICF). We assessed cortical excitability measurements in 48 subjects with schizophrenia before and after a single session of active tDCS (20â¯min, 2â¯mA, anode over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cathode over left temporoparietal cortex) or sham. Those who received active tDCS had a significant increase of SICI in the left motor cortex compared to those who received sham stimulation (Cohen's dâ¯=â¯0.54, pâ¯=â¯.019). No changes were observed for ICF. In addition, lower SICI was associated with higher age (ßâ¯=â¯-0.448, pâ¯<â¯.01). Increase in intracortical inhibition may indicate a mechanism of action of tDCS in this population. Future studies should investigate whether this finding is a biomarker of treatment response for schizophrenia.
Subject(s)
Cortical Excitability , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Schizophrenia/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Despite the lower prevalence of severe mood disorders in the elderly as compared to younger adults, late-life depression and bipolar disorder (BD) are more strongly associated with negative outcomes related to the presence of medical comorbidities, cognitive deficits, and increased suicide risk and overall mortality. The mechanisms that contribute to these associations are probably multifactorial, involving pathological factors related directly and indirectly to the disease itself, ranging from biological to psychosocial factors. Most of the accumulated knowledge on the nature of these associations derives from naturalistic and observational studies, and controlled data are still scarce. Nonetheless, there has clearly been a recent growth of the scientific interest on late-life BD and geriatric depression. In the present study, we review the most relevant studies on prevalence, clinical presentation, and cognitive/functional impact of mood disorders in elderly. Several clinical-epidemiological studies were dedicated to the study of the prevalence of mood disorders in old age in distinct settings; however, fewer studies investigated the underlying neurobiological findings and treatment specificities in late-life depression and BD. In the present study, we further discuss the implications of these findings on the management of mood disorders in older adults.
ABSTRACT
A depressão pós Acidente Vascular Cerebral (AVC) é uma condição desabilitante que ocorre em um terço dos casos. Há uma dificuldade no tratamento farmacológico devido a efeitos adversos e eficácia limitada. Recentemente, a estimulação trasncraniana por corrente contínua (ETCC) tem demonstrado eficácia no tratamento da depressão unipolar, apesar dos seus efeitos em depressões secundárias serem desconhecidos. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a eficácia e segurança da ETCC, uma intervenção não farmacológica, para depressão pós AVC (DPA), através de um ensaio clínico, randomizado, duplo-cego, sham-controlado. Foram incluídos quarenta e oito pacientes sem uso de antidepressivos com DPA foram igualmente divididos em 2 grupos que não diferiram em gênero, idade, gravidade do AVC ou da depressão e nem em outras variáveis clínicas. Foram realiadas 12 sessões de 30 minutos de ETCC com 2mA de corrente com ânodo à esquerda e cátodo à direita em córtex pré-frontal dorsolateral. Para a ETCC sham foi feita um minuto de estimulação somente, seguida por desligamento da máquina até um total de 30 minutos. Foi feita uma análise por intenção de tratamento, na qual o desfecho primário foi mudança na Hamilton Depression Rating Scale na sexta-semana (final). Resposta clínica e remissão foram desfechos secundários. Segurança foi avaliada usando um questionário de efeitos adversos, avaliação da cognição e a escala de mania de Young. A ETCC ativa foi significantemente superior a sham no desfecho final (diferença de médias de 4.7 pontos, IC95% de 2.1 a 7.3, P < 0.001). Taxas de resposta e remissão também foram estatisticamente maior no grupo ativo (37.5% e 20.8%, respectivamente) em relação ao grupo sham (4.1% e 0). O número necessário para tratar para resposta e remissão foi, respectivamente, 3 e 5. A região ou lado do AVC não predisse resposta. Nenhum efeito adverso grave foi relatado e a frequência dos efeitos adversos foi semelhante em ambos grupos. Pacientes...
Depression after a stroke is a disabling condition that occurs in up to one-third of cases. Pharmacological treatment is challenging due to adverse effects and presents limited efficacy. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown efficacy in the treatment of unipolar depression, although its antidepressant effects in secondary depressions are unknown. The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of tDCS, a nonpharmacological intervention, for post-stroke depression (PSD) in a prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial. Forty-eight antidepressant-free patients with PSD were equally divided in two groups that did not differ in gender, age, stroke and depression severity and other clinical variables. Twelve 30-minute sessions of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right dorsolateral prefrontal tDCS applied over 6 weeks. For sham tDCS we performed 1-min of stimulation only, followed by no stimulation during the remaining period. Intention-to-treat analysis, in which the primary outcome measure was the change in Hamilton Depression Rating scale score at 6 weeks (endpoint). Clinical response and remission were secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed using an adverse effects questionnaire, cognitive assessment and the Young mania rating scale. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham at endpoint (mean difference, 4.7 points; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.3; P <.001). Response and remission rates were also statistically higher in active (37.5% and 20.8%, respectively) vs. sham (4.1% and 0) groups. The number needed to treat for response and remission was, respectively, 3 and 5. Stroke region or side did not predict response. No serious adverse effects were reported and the frequency of common adverse effects was similar in both groups. Patients and raters were effectively blinded. This is the first controlled study that demonstrates the safety and clinically meaningful efficacy of tDCS in patients...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major , Neuropsychiatry , Prefrontal Cortex , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , StrokeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with comorbid epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizure (PNES) and their caregivers can distinguish between these two events at least one year after initial diagnosis, and to investigate factors associated with correct identification. METHODS: Adult patients with at least a one year diagnosis of both epilepsy and PNES, confirmed through video-electroencephalography (VEEG), were selected. Patients and a caregiver of their choice were interviewed and shown videos containing the patients' epileptic and PNES events. Variables associated with correct identification of events by patients and their caregivers were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients participated in the study. Mean time between VEEG diagnosis and enrollment in the study was 26.8 months (±12.4). Six of patients correctly distinguished between the events shown. Factors associated with correct identification were the absence of intellectual disability, unremitted PNES, and a degree of preserved awareness during the PNES event. Twelve caregivers correctly distinguished between the events shown. Factors associated with correct identification among caregivers were the presentation of only one epileptic seizure type in the patient, and the participation of the caregiver during VEEG monitoring and communication of PNES diagnosis to the patient. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with epilepsy and PNES and their caregivers seem to be unable to discriminate between these events a year after diagnosis. These findings have implications for both clinical follow-up and research involving this population. Future research should further investigate methods that would allow patients and their caregivers to better distinguish between these two events.
Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychophysiologic Disorders/psychology , Somatoform Disorders , Adult , Comorbidity , Diagnosis, Differential , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Video Recording , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Lithium is a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder in all phases, also indicated as add-on drug for unipolar depression and suicide prevention. This study encompasses a broad critical review on the safety and tolerability of lithium for mood disorders. Methods: A computerized search for English written human studies was made in MEDLINE, using the keywords lithium and mood disorders, starting from July 1993 through July 2013 (n = 416). This initial search aimed to select clinical trials, prospective data, and controlled design studies of lithium treatment for mood disorders reporting adverse effects (n = 36). The final selection yielded 91 studies. Results: The most common general side effects in patients on lithium treatment were thirst, frequent urination, dry mouth, weight gain, fatigue and cognitive complaints. Lithium users showed a high prevalence of hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and decrease in urinary concentration ability. Reduction of glomerular filtration rate in patients using lithium was also observed, but in a lesser extent. The evidence of teratogenicity associated with lithium use is not well established. Anti-inflammatory non-steroidal drugs, thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and alprazolam may increase serum lithium and the consequent risk for intoxication. Discussion: Short-term lithium treatment is associated with mild side effects. Medium and long-term lithium treatment, however, might have effects on target organs which may be prevented by periodical monitoring. Overall, lithium is still a safe option for the treatment of mood disorders...
Contexto: O lítio é um tratamento de primeira linha para o transtorno bipolar, em todas as fases, e também é indicado como terapia adjunta para a depressão unipolar e prevenção do suicídio. Este estudo abrange uma ampla revisão crítica sobre a segurança e a tolerabilidade do lítio para transtornos do humor. Métodos: Uma busca informatizada para estudos com humanos escritos em inglês foi feita no MEDLINE, usando as palavras-chave lítio e transtornos de humor, a partir de julho de 1993 a julho de 2013 (n = 416). Esta pesquisa inicial teve como objetivo selecionar ensaios clínicos, estudos prospectivos e estudos controlados com tratamento com lítio para transtornos de humor, relatando efeitos adversos (n = 36). A seleção final identificou 91 estudos. Resultados: Os efeitos colaterais mais comuns nos pacientes em tratamento com lítio foram sede, micção frequente, boca seca, ganho de peso, fadiga e queixas cognitivas. Usuários de lítio mostraram uma alta prevalência de hipotireoidismo, hiperparatireoidismo e diminuição da capacidade de concentração urinária. Também foi observada redução da taxa de filtração glomerular em pacientes utilizando lítio, mas em menor grau. A evidência de teratogenicidade associada com o uso de lítio não está bem estabelecida. Os medicamentos anti-inflamatórios não esteroides, diuréticos, inibidores da enzima de conversão da angiotensina e alprazolam podem aumentar o lítio sérico e o consequente risco de intoxicação. Conclusões: O tratamento de curto prazo com lítio está associado com efeitos colaterais leves. No entanto, tratamentos de médio a longo prazo com lítio podem ter efeitos sobre órgãos-alvo que podem ser prevenidos por acompanhamento periódico. Em geral, o lítio é ainda uma alternativa segura para o tratamento dos transtornos de humor...
Subject(s)
Humans , Lithium/adverse effects , Lithium/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Depression , Drug InteractionsABSTRACT
São raras as espondilodiscites fúngicas decorrentes de espéciesdo gênero Candida, sendo que até 2004 foram descritos menos de 75 casos. RELATO DE CASO: Homem, 42 anos, com história de etilismo por 35 anos, foi admitido com quadro de dorem abdome inferior com irradiação para membros inferiores e fraqueza dos mesmos nos últimos 3 meses. Os achados do exame físico foram: atrofia muscular em região glútea, dor àmobilização da articulação coxo-femoral, lombalgia em níveis L4 e L5 e força muscular grau II de parte distal de membros inferiores. O paciente foi internado e introduziu-se empiracamenteclindamicina e ciprofloxacina por suspeita de espondilodiscite, confirmada por meio do exame de Ressonância Magnética (RM)...
Fungic Spondilodiscit decorrent of Candida generus species arerare, being less than 75 cases described until 2004. Case Report: Man, 42 years old, with 35 years history of alcohol abuse, was admitted with a lower abdomen pain with irradiation toinferior members and weakness of them in the past 3 months. The physical exam were: gluteus muscular atrophy, mobilization pain of the coxo-femoral articulation, L4 and L5 back pain andmuscle strength grade II in the inferior member distal part. The patient was admitted and initiated clindamicin and ciprofloxacin with the suspect of spondilodiscit, confirmed by MagneticRessonance (RM)..