2021 Guidelines on Helicobacter pylori. Coincidences and divergences between the Spanish and World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO) guidelines.

This editorial summarizes and discusses the most relevant aspects of the latest WGO guidelines on Helicobacter pylori infection, while considering the recently reported Spanish consensus on its management.

Treating Helicobacter pylori infection in the face of growing antibiotic resistance.

Helicobacter pylori eradication cures most peptic ulcers and non-atrophic chronic gastritis, and may potentially prevent over 70% of gastric cancers. In the late 1980s, shortly after the discovery of H. pylori, eradication therapy was established based on the use of two antibiotics (amoxicillin and clarithromycin) and one proton-pump inhibitor for 7 or 10 days (OCA7, OCA10). This therapy, recommended during the first Maastricht Consensus Conference, obtained eradication rates above 90%, and was equally effective everywhere around the world. However, over time, H. pylori has developed resistance to several antibiotics.

El tratamiento de la infección por Helicobacter pylori en un entorno de resistencia creciente a los antibióticos / Treating Helicobacter pylori infection in the face of growing antibiotic resistance

No disponible

Tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication based on prior intake of macrolide antibiotics allows the use of triple therapy with optimal results in an area with high clarithromycin resistance

Background: the previous intake of macrolide antibiotics is associated with a failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with clarithromycin-containing regimens. However, the standard triple therapy achieves eradication rates of over 90% in patients without a previous use of macrolides in our health area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an H. pylori eradication strategy based on the intake of macrolides by the patient during the previous years. Methods: one hundred and sixty-nine patients with H. pylori infection were prospectively included in the study. The electronic medical record of each patient was reviewed at the time of inclusion. Depending on their previous intake of macrolides, patients were assigned to one of two eradication regimens: group A) patients without a previous intake of macrolides received an optimized triple therapy for 14 days; and group B) patients with a previous intake of macrolides received bismuth quadruple therapy for ten days. Results: ninety-one patients (53.84%) without a previous intake of macrolides received an optimized triple therapy (group A) and 78 patients (46.15%) with a previous intake of macrolides received bismuth quadruple therapy (group B). In group A, the H. pylori eradication rates were 90.11% in the intention-to-treat and 95.35% in the per-protocol analysis. In group B, the H. pylori eradication rates were 85.89% in the intention-to-treat and 98.5% in the per-protocol analysis. The overall eradication rates obtained using this strategy were 88.16% (95% CI: 82.32-92.02%) in the intention-to-treat and 96.75% (95% CI: 92.59-98.94%) in the per-protocol analysis. Conclusions: an H. pylori eradication strategy based on the intake of macrolides during the previous years achieves overall eradication rates close to 90% and allows the use of standard triple therapy in more than half of the patients from a health area with a high level of clarithromycin resistance

No disponible

Tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication based on prior intake of macrolide antibiotics allows the use of triple therapy with optimal results in an area with high clarithromycin resistance.

BACKGROUND: the previous intake of macrolide antibiotics is associated with a failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with clarithromycin-containing regimens. However, the standard triple therapy achieves eradication rates of over 90% in patients without a previous use of macrolides in our health area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an H. pylori eradication strategy based on the intake of macrolides by the patient during the previous years. METHODS: one hundred and sixty-nine patients with H. pylori infection were prospectively included in the study. The electronic medical record of each patient was reviewed at the time of inclusion. Depending on their previous intake of macrolides, patients were assigned to one of two eradication regimens: group A) patients without a previous intake of macrolides received an optimized triple therapy for 14 days; and group B) patients with a previous intake of macrolides received bismuth quadruple therapy for ten days. RESULTS: ninety-one patients (53.84%) without a previous intake of macrolides received an optimized triple therapy (group A) and 78 patients (46.15%) with a previous intake of macrolides received bismuth quadruple therapy (group B). In group A, the H. pylori eradication rates were 90.11% in the intention-to-treat and 95.35% in the per-protocol analysis. In group B, the H. pylori eradication rates were 85.89% in the intention-to-treat and 98.5% in the per-protocol analysis. The overall eradication rates obtained using this strategy were 88.16% (95% CI: 82.32-92.02%) in the intention-to-treat and 96.75% (95% CI: 92.59-98.94%) in the per-protocol analysis. CONCLUSIONS: an H. pylori eradication strategy based on the intake of macrolides during the previous years achieves overall eradication rates close to 90% and allows the use of standard triple therapy in more than half of the patients from a health area with a high level of clarithromycin resistance.

Development and validation of a scoring index to predict the presence of lesions in capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease of the small bowel: a Spanish multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first-line investigation in cases of suspected Crohn's disease (CD) of the small bowel, but the factors associated with a higher diagnostic yield remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to develop and validate a scoring index to assess the risk of the patients in this setting on the basis of biomarkers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, and other biomarkers from a population of 124 patients with suspected CD of the small bowel studied by CE and included in a PhD study were used to build a scoring index. This was first used on this population (internal validation process) and after that on a different set of patients from a multicenter study (external validation process). RESULTS: An index was designed in which every biomarker is assigned a score. Three risk groups have been established (low, intermediate, and high). In the internal validation analysis (124 individuals), patients had a 10, 46.5, and 81% probability of showing inflammatory lesions in CE in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. In the external validation analysis, including 410 patients from 12 Spanish hospitals, this probability was 15.8, 49.7, and 80.6% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results from the internal validation process show that the scoring index is coherent, and results from the external validation process confirm its reliability. This index can be a useful tool for selecting patients before CE studies in cases of suspected CD of the small bowel.

Role of capsule endoscopy in alarm features and non-responsive celiac disease: A European multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in established celiac disease (CD) remains unclear. Our objective was to analyze the usefulness of CE in the suspicion of complicated CD. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study. One hundred and eighty-nine celiac patients (mean age: 46.6 ± 16.6, 30.2% males) who underwent CE for alarm symptoms (n = 86, 45.5%) or non-responsive CD (n = 103, 54.5%) were included. Diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic impact and safety were analyzed. RESULTS: Capsule endoscopy was completed in 95.2% of patients (small bowel transit time: 270.5 ± 100.2 min). Global DY was 67.2%, detecting atrophic mucosa (n = 92, 48.7%), ulcerative jejunoileitis (n = 21, 11.1%), intestinal lymphoma (n = 7, 3.7%) and other enteropathies (n = 7, 3.7%, six Crohn's disease cases and one neuroendocrine tumor). The DY of CE was significantly higher in patients presenting with non-responsive disease compared to patients with alarm symptoms (73.8% vs 59.3%, P = 0.035). The new findings of the CE modified management in 59.3% of the cases. There were no major complications. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy may be a moderately helpful and safe diagnostic tool in the suspicion of complicated CD, modifying the clinical course of these patients.

Macrolide use in the previous years is associated with failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with clarithromycin-containing regimens.

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that prior use of macrolide antibiotics is a useful predictor of the likelihood of standard triple therapy failure in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In this study, we have evaluated whether previous intake of macrolides correlates with failure to eradicate H. pylori using two different first-line clarithromycin-containing regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 212 patients with H. pylori infection treated with one of two first-line clarithromycin-containing regimens: 108 patients treated with triple therapy for 10 days and 104 patients treated with concomitant therapy for 10 days. The intake of macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, and other macrolides) prior to the eradication therapy was obtained from the electronic medical record, which contains information regarding all the medication prescribed to the patients since the year 2004. RESULTS: One hundred of 212 patients (47.2%) had received at least one treatment with macrolides during the years prior to the eradication therapy. H. pylori eradication rates were significantly lower in patients with previous use compared to patients without previous use of macrolides, both with triple therapy (60.8% vs 92.9%; P < .0001) and with concomitant therapy (85.7% vs 98.2%; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Previous use of macrolides correlates with a low H. pylori eradication rate with triple and concomitant clarithromycin-containing regimens. In addition, our study shows that in patients without previous use of macrolides, triple therapy achieves per-protocol eradication rates over 90%.

Role of capsule endoscopy in suspected celiac disease: A European multi-centre study.

AIM: To analyze the diagnostic yield (DY), therapeutic impact (TI) and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE). METHODS: This is a multi-centre, observational, analytical, retrospective study. A total of 163 patients with suspicion of celiac disease (CD) (mean age = 46.4 ± 17.3 years, 68.1% women) who underwent CE from 2003 to 2015 were included. Patients were divided into four groups: seronegative CD with atrophy (Group-I, n = 19), seropositive CD without atrophy (Group-II, n = 39), contraindication to gastroscopy (Group-III, n = 6), seronegative CD without atrophy, but with a compatible context (Group-IV, n = 99). DY, TI and the safety of CE were analysed. RESULTS: The overall DY was 54% and the final diagnosis was villous atrophy (n = 65, 39.9%), complicated CD (n = 12, 7.4%) and other enteropathies (n = 11, 6.8%; 8 Crohn's). DY for groups I to IV was 73.7%, 69.2%, 50% and 44.4%, respectively. Atrophy was located in duodenum in 24 cases (36.9%), diffuse in 19 (29.2%), jejunal in 11 (16.9%), and patchy in 10 cases (15.4%). Factors associated with a greater DY were positive serology (68.3% vs 49.2%, P = 0.034) and older age (P = 0.008). On the other hand, neither sex nor clinical presentation, family background, positive histology or HLA status were associated with DY. CE results changed the therapeutic approach in 71.8% of the cases. Atrophy was associated with a greater TI (92.3% vs 45.3%, P < 0.001) and 81.9% of the patients responded to diet. There was one case of capsule retention (0.6%). Agreement between CE findings and subsequent histology was 100% for diagnosing normal/other conditions, 70% for suspected CD and 50% for complicated CD. CONCLUSION: CE has a high DY in cases of suspicion of CD and it leads to changes in the clinical course of the disease. CE is safe procedure with a high degree of concordance with histology and it helps in the differential diagnosis of CD.

A proposed reference change value for an IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoassay to improve interpretation of serial results in celiac patients.

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder caused by an inappropriate immunological response to gluten ingestion in genetically susceptible individuals. IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies have been widely employed as a specific biochemical marker for CD. Recent studies have also shown its usefulness in evaluating patient compliance with a gluten-free diet. METHODS: A group of 28 subjects with CD was selected for the study. Each fulfilled the requirement of a gluten-free diet for more than one year. IgA anti-tTG determination was performed every two months for half a year. These data were used to estimate the biological variation (BV) of IgA anti-tTG in celiac patients and to calculate the reference change value (RCV). RESULTS: The within-subject biological variation (CVI) and between-subject biological variation (CV(G)) were 19.2% and 75.6%, respectively, and the index of individuality was 0.25. The RCV calculated using these data together with our analytical imprecision (5.7%) was 55.5% for a 95% level of significance. CONCLUSIONS: We have determined for the first time the BV and the RCV for IgA anti-tTG in a celiac population. This value and the probability curve generated from our data could be a valuable tool for monitoring patients' adherence to dietary treatment.

Amyloidosis and Crohn´s disease.

Secondary amyloidosis is a rare but serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease that may influence the prognosis even more than the underlying disease. Due to a better knowledge of the association of secondary amyloidosis to inflammatory bowel disease, early diagnosis of this complication is becoming more frequent, but its treatment continues to pose a challenge. We report 4 cases of patients with Crohn´s disease and amyloidosis diagnosed in the inflammatory bowel disease Units of Toledo and Ciudad Real, which represent 0.68% of the patients with Crohn´s disease of our health areas. There have been not cases of amyloidosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. In our 4 patients the secondary amyloidosis was clearly related to Crohn´s disease,which was often of fistulising type. The predominant clinical picture of amyloidosis was nephrotic syndrome. The patients responded to medical and surgical treatment of Crohn´s disease and colchicine, which improved renal function in all cases except in one who required kidney transplantation.

Amiloidosis y enfermedad de Crohn / Amyloidosis and Crohn's disease

La amiloidosis sistémica adquirida es una complicación rara pero grave de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal crónica, pudiendo condicionar el pronóstico más que la propia enfermedad de base. Debido al mejor conocimiento de la asociación de amiloidosis secundaria a enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, el diagnóstico temprano se hace cada vez con mayor frecuencia, pero su tratamiento continúa siendo un reto. Describimos 4 casos clínicos de pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn (EC) y amiloidosis diagnosticados en las Unidades de EIIC de Toledo y Ciudad Real, lo que representa el 0,68% de los caso de EC de nuestras áreas sanitarias. No se ha descrito ningún caso de amiloidosis en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. En los 4 pacientes la AA estaba claramente relacionada con la EC, y predominaron las formas estenosantes-perforantes. El cuadro clínico de presentación de la amiloidosis en la mayoría de los casos fue un síndrome nefrótico. Los pacientes respondieron al tratamiento médico-quirúrgico de la EC y a la colchicina, con lo que mejoró la función renal en todos los casos salvo en uno que precisó trasplante renal(AU)

Secondary amyloidosis is a rare but serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease that may influence the prognosis even more than the underlying disease. Due to a better knowledge of the association of secondary amyloidosis to inflammatory bowel disease, early diagnosis of this complication is becoming more frequent, but it s treatment continues to pose a challenge. We report 4 cases of patients with Crohn’s disease and amyloidosis diagnosed in the inflammatory bowel disease Units of Toledo and Ciudad Real, which represent 0.68% of the patients with Crohn’s disease of our health areas. There have been not cases of amyloidosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. In our 4 patients the secondary amyloidosis was clearly related to Crohn’s disease, which was often of fistulising type. The predominant clinical picture of amyloidosis was nephrotic syndrome. The patients responded to medical and surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease and colchicine, which improved renal function in all cases except in one who required kidney transplantation(AU)

Evaluation of different bowel preparations for small bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: To obtain an adequate view of the whole small intestine during capsule endoscopy (CE) a clear liquid diet and overnight fasting is recommended. However, intestinal content can hamper vision in spite of these measures. Our aim was to evaluate tolerance and degree of intestinal cleanliness during CE following three types of bowel preparation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Two-hundred ninety-one patients underwent one of the following preparations: 4 L of clear liquids (CL) (group A; 92 patients); 90 mL of aqueous sodium phosphate (group B; 89 patients); or 4 L of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (group C; 92 patients). The degree of cleanliness of the small bowel was classified by blinded examiners according to four categories (excellent, good, fair or poor). The degree of patient satisfaction, gastric and small bowel transit times, and diagnostic yield were measured. RESULTS: The degree of cleanliness did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.496). Interobserver concordance was fair (k = 0.38). No significant differences were detected between the diagnostic yields of the CE (P = 0.601). Gastric transit time was 35.7 ± 3.7 min (group A), 46.1 ± 8.6 min (group B) and 34.6 ± 5.0 min (group C) (P = 0.417). Small-intestinal transit time was 276.9 ± 10.7 min (group A), 249.7 ± 13.1 min (group B) and 245.6 ± 11.6 min (group C) (P = 0.120). CL was the best tolerated preparation. Compliance with the bowel preparation regimen was lowest in group C (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A clear liquid diet and overnight fasting is sufficient to achieve an adequate level of cleanliness and is better tolerated by patients than other forms of preparation.

Diagnóstico serológico de gastritis atrófica con una combinación de pepsinógeno I y II, gastrina-17 y anticuerpos anti-Helicobacter pylori / Serological diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with a combination of pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies

Objetivo: El diagnóstico no invasivo de gastritis atrófica ayudaría a identificar individuos con un riesgo elevado de carcinoma gástrico. En este estudio se ha evaluado la utilidad de un panel serológico que combina pepsinógeno I y II, gastrina-17 y anticuerpos anti-Helicobacter pylori (Gastropanel) como método de cribado de la gastritis atrófica. Pacientes y métodos: El panel serológico se evaluó en 56 pacientes de dos grupos: a) 47 pacientes con dispepsia no investigada, y b) 9 pacientes consecutivos con carcinoma gástrico. En todos ellos se realizó una endoscopia con toma de biopsias del antro y el cuerpo gástricos. Los valores de pepsinógeno I y II, gastrina-17 y anticuerpos anti-H. pylori se determinaron mediante test EIA específicos (Biohit plc, Helsinki, Finlandia) en muestras de suero de los pacientes obtenidas en ayunas. Resultados: La gastritis atrófica fue significativamente más frecuente en los pacientes con carcinoma gástrico que en los pacientes dispépticos (el 56 frente al 6%; p = 0,0015). El grado de concordancia entre el panel serológico y la histología gástrica fue bueno (kappa = 0,68). La sensibilidad y la especificidad del panel serológico para diagnosticar la gastritis atrófica fueron del 87,5 y el 100%, respectivamente. Sin embargo, el panel serológico no habría detectado 4 de los 9 casos de carcinoma gástrico, ya que se originaron en un estómago con mucosa no atrófica. Conclusiones: El panel serológico es un método no invasivo útil para el diagnóstico de gastritis atrófica. Sin embargo, su utilidad como método de cribado está limitada por la existencia de casos de carcinoma gástrico que aparecen en estómagos sin atrofia mucosa

Objective: Noninvasive diagnosis of atrophic gastritis would help to identify individuals at increased risk of gastric carcinoma. In the present study, we evaluated the utility of a serological panel combining pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17, and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies (Gastropanel) as a screening method for atrophic gastritis. Patients and methods: The serological panel was evaluated in 56 patients divided in two groups: group 1 consisted of 47 patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia and group 2 was composed of nine consecutive patients with gastric carcinoma. In all patients, we performed endoscopy with biopsies of the gastric antrum and body. Levels of pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17, and anti-H. pylori antibodies were determined through a specific EIA test (Biohit plc, Helsinki, Finland) in fasting serum samples. Results: Atrophic gastritis was significantly more frequent in patients with gastric carcinoma than in those with dyspepsia (56 vs 6%; p = 0.0015). Agreement between the Gastropanel and gastric histology was good (kappa = 0.68). The sensitivity and specificity of the Gastropanel in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. However, the Gastropanel would not have detected four of the nine cases of gastric carcinoma, since these tumors arose in stomachs with nonatrophic mucosa. Conclusions: Gastropanel is a useful noninvasive method for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. However, its utility as a screening method is limited by cases of gastric carcinoma that arise in stomachs without atrophic mucosa

[Serological diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with a combination of pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies]. / Diagnóstico serológico de gastritis atrófica con una combinación de pepsinógeno I y II, gastrina-17 y anticuerpos anti-Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive diagnosis of atrophic gastritis would help to identify individuals at increased risk of gastric carcinoma. In the present study, we evaluated the utility of a serological panel combining pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17, and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies (Gastropanel) as a screening method for atrophic gastritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The serological panel was evaluated in 56 patients divided in two groups: group 1 consisted of 47 patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia and group 2 was composed of nine consecutive patients with gastric carcinoma. In all patients, we performed endoscopy with biopsies of the gastric antrum and body. Levels of pepsinogen I and II, gastrin-17, and anti-H. pylori antibodies were determined through a specific EIA test (Biohit plc, Helsinki, Finland) in fasting serum samples. RESULTS: Atrophic gastritis was significantly more frequent in patients with gastric carcinoma than in those with dyspepsia (56 vs 6%; p = 0.0015). Agreement between the Gastropanel and gastric histology was good (kappa = 0.68). The sensitivity and specificity of the Gastropanel in the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. However, the Gastropanel would not have detected four of the nine cases of gastric carcinoma, since these tumors arose in stomachs with nonatrophic mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Gastropanel is a useful noninvasive method for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. However, its utility as a screening method is limited by cases of gastric carcinoma that arise in stomachs without atrophic mucosa.

[Clinicopathological characteristics of uninvestigated dyspepsia in Spain]. / Características clinicopatológicas de la dispepsia no investigada en España.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia are diagnosed with functional dyspepsia. Various types of Helicobacter pylori gastritis have been described, each of which is associated with a distinct natural history of the infection (i.e. a different risk of ulcer or gastric cancer). OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in our area and the prevalence of the distinct types of H. pylori gastritis among patients with functional dyspepsia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (47 men and 51 women, mean age 35.8+/-13 years) with uninvestigated dyspepsia were included in this study. All the patients completed the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale and all patients underwent gastroscopy with biopsy and the C13-urea breath test. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had organic causes of dyspepsia and 78 had functional dyspepsia. Fifty-one patients with functional dyspepsia (65%) had H. pylori infection; of these, 27 had pangastritis, 21 had antrum-predominant gastritis, 2 had multifocal atrophic gastritis and 1 had normal gastric mucosa. Among uninfected patients, 2 had multifocal atrophic gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of functional dyspepsia in this series was 85%. Twenty-seven percent of patients with functional dyspepsia had a combination of H. pylori infection and antrum-predominant gastritis, the type of gastritis predisposing to duodenal ulcer. Only 5% of the patients had multifocal atrophic gastritis, which is associated with a high risk of gastric cancer.

Características clinicopatológicas de la dispepsia no investigada en España / Clinicopathological characteristics of uninvestigated dyspepsia in Spain

Introducción: La mayoría de los pacientes con dispepsia no investigada son diagnosticados de dispepsia funcional. Se han descrito varios tipos de gastritis por Helicobacter pylori, cada uno de los cuales se asocia a una historia natural diferente de la infección (p. ej., diferente riesgo de enfermedad ulcerosa o de cáncer gástrico). Objetivo: Determinar las características clínicas y patológicas de los pacientes con dispepsia no investigada en nuestra área y la prevalencia de los diferentes tipos de gastritis por H. pylori en los pacientes con dispepsia funcional. Material y métodos: Se incluyó en el estudio a 98 pacientes (47 varones y 51 mujeres, con una media de edad de 35,8 ± 13 años) con dispepsia no investigada. Todos ellos rellenaron el Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida Asociada a Dispepsia, y a todos se les realizó gastroscopia con toma de biopsias y test del aliento con C13-Urea. Resultados: Catorce pacientes tenían causas orgánicas de dispepsia y 78 dispepsia funcional; 51 pacientes con dispepsia funcional (65%) tenían infección por H. pylori y, de ellos, 27 tenía pangastritis, 21 gastritis de predominio antral, 2 gastritis atrófica multifocal y 1 mucosa gástrica normal. Entre los pacientes no infectados, 2 presentaban gastritis atrófica multifocal. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de dispepsia funcional en esta serie fue del 85%. Un 27% de los pacientes con dispepsia funcional presenta la combinación de infección por H. pylori y gastritis de predominio antral, que es el tipo de gastritis que predispone a la aparición de enfermedad ulcerosa duodenal. Sólo un 5% de los pacientes tiene gastritis atrófica multifocal, que es la que se asocia con un riesgo elevado de cáncer gástrico

Introduction: Most patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia are diagnosed with functional dyspepsia. Various types of Helicobacter pylori gastritis have been described, each of which is associated with a distinct natural history of the infection (i.e. a different risk of ulcer or gastric cancer). Objective: To determine the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia in our area and the prevalence of the distinct types of H. pylori gastritis among patients with functional dyspepsia. Material and methods: Ninety-eigth patients (47 men and 51 women, mean age 35.8 ± 13 years) with uninvestigated dyspepsia were included in this study. All the patients completed the Dyspepsia-Related Health Scale and all patients underwent gastroscopy with biopsy and the C13-urea breath test. Results: Fourteen patients had organic causes of dyspepsia and 78 had functional dyspepsia. Fifty-one patients with functional dyspepsia (65%) had H. pylori infection; of these, 27 had pangastritis, 21 had antrum-predominant gastritis, 2 had multifocal atrophic gastritis and 1 had normal gastric mucosa. Among uninfected patients, 2 had multifocal atrophic gastritis. Conclusions: The prevalence of functional dyspepsia in this series was 85%. Twenty-seven percent of patients with functional dyspepsia had a combination of H. pylori infection and antrum-predominant gastritis, the type of gastritis predisposing to duodenal ulcer. Only 5% of the patients had multifocal atrophic gastritis, which is associated with a high risk of gastric cancer