Liver resection associated with mini porto-caval shunt as salvage treatment in patients with progression of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: a case report.

Tumor progression before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the main cause of dropouts from waiting lists among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Performing a porto-caval shunt (PCS) before parenchymal liver transection has the potential to allow an extended hepatectomy in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, reducing portal hyperflow and therefore the sinusoidal shear-stress on the remnant liver. We report the case of a 59-year-old man affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh score presentation, C-10; Model for End Stage Liver Disease score, 18) and HCC (2 lesions of 2 and 2.8 cm). The patient began the evaluation to join the OLT waiting list, but, in the 3 months required to complete the evaluation, he developed tumor progression: 3 HCC lesions, the largest 1 with a diameter of about 4.4 cm. These findings excluded transplantation criteria and the patient was referred to our center. After appropriate preoperative studies, the patient underwent a major liver resection (trisegmentectomy) after side-to-side PCS by interposition of an iliac vein graft from a cadaveric donor. The patient overcame the worsened severity of cirrhosis. After 6 months of follow-up, he developed 2 other HCC nodules. He was then included on the waiting list at our center, undergoing OLT from a cadaveric donor at 8 months after salvage treatment. At 36 months after OLT, he is alive and free from HCC recurrence. Associating a partial side-to-side PCS with hepatic resection may represent a potential salvage therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and HCC progression beyond listing criteria for OLT.

Prospective validation of a new priority allocation model for liver transplant candidates: an interim analysis.

BACKGROUND: The system that controls the waiting list (WL) and organ allocation for liver transplantation (OLT) seeks to achieve 3 main goals: objectivity, low dropout risks and good post-OLT results. We sought to prospectively validate a priority allocation model that is believed to achieve objectivity without penalizing dropout risk and post-OLT results. METHODS: We evaluated a study group of 272 patients enrolled in 2006-2007. WL candidates were divided into 2 categories: cirrhotic patients classified according to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (MELD list and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) organized according to a specific score (non-MELD list). The allocation algorithm for donor-recipient match assigned an optimal graft to the first MELD candidate with a MELD score of >or=20; a suboptimal graft, to the first non-MELD patient. A respective control group of 327 patients transplanted from 2003-2006 was characterized by a unique WL with a free allocation policy. We performed an interim analysis of this prospectively controlled study. RESULTS: Although the study group showed a lower percentage of OLT (P < .05) than the control group (37% vs 45%), it selected patients for OLT based on a higher MELD score (P < .05), thus obtaining similar dropout, post-OLT survivals, and intention-to-treat (ITT) survival probabilities as the controls. Among MELD patients, we observed a significantly reduced dropout and better ITT survival profiles than those of the control group (P = .02), whereas the similar results were delivered among non-MELD patients (P > .05). Among patients with a MELD score of >or=20, the prevalences of suboptimal grafts (0% vs 48%) and of early graft losses (0% vs 21%) were lower in the study than in the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We prospectively validated a priority allocation model based on objective criteria that achieved high ITT survival rates.

Prognostic evaluation of the donor risk index among a prospective cohort of Italian patients undergoing liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The definition of an extended criteria donor for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains controversial. The donor risk index (DRI) has become the main tool to define the marginality of hepatic grafts in the United States. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic ability of DRI among a cohort of Italian patients undergoing OLT. METHODS: From December 2006 to March 2008, we prospectively calculated DRI in all consecutive cadaveric grafts. Recipient inclusion criteria were: adult patients with chronic liver disease enlisted for primary OLT. The primary end point was the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PDF), namely, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >2000 U/mL and prothrombin time <40% on postoperative days 2-7. RESULTS: We enrolled 74 donor-recipient pairs fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Donor characteristics included DRI 1.7 (range, 0.9-3.0); age 57 years (range, 18-81); ultrasound signs of steatosis in 22 donors (30%); and ischemia time was 536 minutes (range, 290-690). Recipient characteristics are: age 55 years (range, 27-68); hepatocellular carcinoma in 36 subjects (49%); MELD was 16 (range, 7-39); and Child-Pugh score was 8 (range, 6-14). In terms of the primary end points, the DRI did not provide a significant PDF predictor (P = .84). Among all evaluated donor and recipient variables, the following were related to the incidence of graft PDF: donor age (P = .07), ultrasound signs of steatosis (P = .02), donor AST (P = .05), cell saver infusion (P = .07), and warm (P = .04) and cold ischemia (P = .07) times. CONCLUSION: The preliminary data of this study showed a poor correlation between DRI and PDF incidence after OLT.

Validation of the BCLC prognostic system in surgical hepatocellular cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Prognosis assessment in surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. The most widely used HCC prognostic tool is the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, but its prognostic ability in surgical patients has not been yet validated. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of known prognostic systems in 400 Italian HCC patients treated with radical surgical therapies. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective database collection (400 surgical, 315 nonsurgical patients) observed at a single institution from 2000 and 2007. By using survival times as the only outcome measure (Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression), the performance of the BCLC classification was compared with that of Okuda, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program, United Network for Organ sharing TNM, and Japan Integrated Staging Score staging systems. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients underwent laparotomy resection; 55, laparoscopic procedures (ablation and/or resection); and 120, liver transplantations. In the surgical group, BCLC proved the best HCC prognostic system. Three-year survival rates of patients in BCLC Stages A, B, and C were 81%, 56%, and 44% respectively, (P < .01); whereas all other tested staging systems did not show significant stratification ability. When all 715 HCC patients were considered, surgery proved to be a significant survival predictor in each BCLC stage (A, B, and C). CONCLUSIONS: BCLC staging showed the best interpretation of the survival distribution in a surgical HCC population. The BCLC treatment algorithm should consider the role of surgery also for intermediate-advanced stages of liver disease.

Alcohol abuse and de novo tumors in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Organ transplant recipients show an increased incidence of cancer ranging from 4% to 16% owing to several causes: immunosuppression, viral infection, individual predisposition, and so on. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 43/683 (6.3%) recipients of 734 liver transplants performed from November 1991 to November 2008 who experienced a de novo neoplasm. CONCLUSION: Alcohol abuse significantly increased the rate of all de novo neoplasms and particularly pharyngogastroesophageal cancers among population of liver transplant recipients. Minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is necessary to reduce the risk of a de novo neoplasm. Strict posttransplant follow-up is required to identify early gastroenteric tumors.

Long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of the University of Padova experience.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) competes with benign liver disease as indication for liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine long-term results of OLT for HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic role of HCC diagnosis at pathological exam in adult OLT. In the HCC group, we evaluated the prognostic role of the time of diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and of pathological tumor TNM staging. The primary endpoint was 1-, 3-, and 10-year patient survivals. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2006, among 550 adults who underwent first OLT, HCC was found in 120 patients at pathological exam. In 26 cases (22%), the diagnosis of HCC was incidental. There were 59 cases (49%) of pathological T1 to T2 tumor (one nodule < 5 cm, or two to three nodules < 3 cm, without metastases and/or vascular invasion), and 61 cases (51%) of pathologic T3-T4a tumor. HCC diagnosis did not show a significant prognostic impact by Cox survival analysis. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 91%, 81%, and 73% in the HCC group, and 84%, 76%, and 67% in the non-HCC group. Time of HCC diagnosis (incidental versus nonincidental) and pathological TNM staging (T1 to T2 vs T3 to T4a) did not result significant survival predictors upon Cox analysis. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the long-term results of OLT for HCC overlapped those of OLT for benign disease, although 51% of tumors were T3 to T4a at pathological exam.

Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis as a significant mortality factor in intention-to-treat analysis in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation represents the gold standard for the treatment of chronic liver disease. The whole transplantation process was assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis and considering patients from the time of their inclusion on the list and throughout lengthy follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1, 1999 to June 1, 2004, 373 adults joined the waiting list for liver transplantation at our institution. The main variables analyzed were: age, gender, etiology, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh class, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. Global survival was evaluated using intention-to-treat analysis from the time of patient inclusion in the list to the end of their late follow-up. RESULTS: The median waiting time was 20 months (range 0.1 to 70.2). By univariate analysis, the variables significantly influencing survival when patients joined the waiting list were: encephalopathy; ascites, poor nutritional status, Child-Pugh class C, UNOS 2, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and bilirubin > 2 mg/dL. By multivariate analysis, only HCV-related cirrhosis emerged as having an independent prognostic value. By intention-to-treat analysis, the 5-year survival rate was 67% and 79% for HCV-positive and HCV-negative patients, respectively (P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: HCV-related cirrhosis is an independent prognostic factor for survival according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Different inclusion criteria or treatments while on the waiting list and after transplantation need to be considered in the future for HCV-positive patients.

Prognostic impact of model for end-stage liver disease score in patients undergoing liver transplantation with suboptimal livers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the prognostic impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT) with suboptimal livers. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2006, 160 adult patients with liver cirrhosis received a whole liver for primary OLT at our institution including 81 with a suboptimal liver (SOL group) versus 79 with an optimal liver (group OL). The definition of suboptimal liver was: one major criterion (age >60 years, steatosis >20%) or at least two minor criteria: sodium >155 mEq/L, Intensive Care Unit stay >7 days, dopamine >10 microg/kg/min, abnormal liver tests, and relevant hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: Baseline recipients characteristics were comparable in the two study groups. The SOL group had a significantly greater number of early graft deaths (<30 days) than the OL group, while the 3-year Kaplan-Meier patient survivals were similar. Using logistic regression, MELD score was significantly related to patient death only in the SOL group (P = .01), and the receiver operator characteristics curve method identified 17 as the best MELD cutoff with the 3-year survival of 93% versus 85% for MELD < or =7 versus >17, respectively (P > 05). In comparison, it was 94% and 72% in the SOL group (P < .05). Similarly, MELD >17 was significantly associated with early graft death rates only in the SOL group. CONCLUSION: This study advised surgeons to not use suboptimal livers for patients with advanced MELD scores, thus supporting a donor-recipient matching policy.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: analysis of Padova experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The main indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) are as follows: (1) cirrhosis with renal damage dependent or not upon liver disease, (2) renal failure with dialysis and concomitant liver end-stage disease, (3) congenital diseases, and (4) enzymatic liver deficiency with concomitant renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate our results with CLKT both in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS: From September 1995 to September 2006, 15 CLKT (2.8%) among 541 liver transplantations included 4 pediatric patients (27%). The main indications for CLKT were hepatitis C virus (HCV) and polycystic diseases in adult patients, and primary hyperoxaluria in pediatric patients. RESULTS: The double transplantation was performed from the same donor in all cases. All adult patients received whole liver grafts, whereas 3 split transplants and 1 whole liver graft were transplanted in the pediatric patients. Median liver and kidney cold ischemia times were 468 and 675 minutes, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 1-125), the overall survival rate was 80%. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% for adult CLKT, whereas they were 50% for pediatric patients. We observed only 2 cases (18%) of delayed renal function, requiring temporary hemodialysis with progressive graft improvement. There was only 1 case of kidney retransplantation due to early graft nonfunction in a pediatric patient. CONCLUSION: Although CLKT is related to major surgical risks, results after transplantation are satisfactory with an evident immunological advantage.

Pediatric liver transplantation: the University of Padua experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze experience on pediatric liver transplantation (LT) between June 1993 and September 2006, including split liver transplantation (SLT), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT). Furthermore, hepatocyte transplantation (HT) had a role in one patient with metabolic disease. METHODS: From November 1990 to September 2006, 657 LTs were performed including 63 pediatric LTs (9.6%) in 57 patients (32 boys and 25 girls). Six were retransplantations (9.5%). Thirty-two patients (57%) were younger than 5 years. The types of graft included the following: 26 whole organs (41%), 32 in situ split organs (51%), 4 reduced-size organs (6%), and 1 graft from a living donor (2%). Two patients received an APOLT, 4 patients received a combined kidney-liver transplantation (CKLT), and 1 patient received HT. Of the 63 pediatric LTs, 16 were behaved to be highly urgent (25%). RESULTS: Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 82%, 82%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 76%, 76%, 72%, and 72%, respectively. In patients younger than 1 year, the 5-year survival rate was 100%. Perioperative mortality was 8.8%. Vascular complications occurred in 4 patients (6.3%). Six children required retransplantation due to primary nonfunction (PNF) in 4 cases (7%) and vascular thrombosis in 2 cases (3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Cholestatic liver disease and age younger than 1 year were the best prognostic factors for excellent survival.

Intention-to-treat analysis of liver transplantation in selected, aggressively treated HCC patients exceeding the Milan criteria.

This prospective study analyzed the dropout probability and intention-to-treat survival rates of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) selected and treated according to our policy before liver transplantation (LT), with particular attention to those exceeding the Milan criteria. Exclusion criteria for LT were macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, and poorly differentiated disease at percutaneous biopsy. A specific multi-modal adjuvant algorithm was used to treat HCC before LT. A total of 100 HCC patients were listed for LT: 40 exceeded the Milan criteria in terms of nodule size and number (MILAN OUT) either at listing or in list, while 60 patients continued to meet the criteria (MILAN IN). The Milan criteria did not prove to be a significant predictor of dropout probability or survival rates using Cox's analysis. Cumulative dropout probability at 6 and 12 months was 0% and 4% for MILAN OUT, and 6% and 11% for MILAN IN. The intention-to-treat survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 95% and 85% in MILAN OUT, and 84% and 69% in MILAN IN. None of the 68 transplanted patients had recurrent HCC after a median 16-month follow-up (0-69 months). In conclusion, LT may be effective for selected, aggressively-treated HCC patients exceeding the Milan criteria.

Liver transplantation with vena cava in situ and selective use of temporary portacaval shunt or portal clamping.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks to temporary porta caval shunt or portal clamping. METHODOLOGY: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performed and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary porta caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback techniques in 45. RESULTS: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was documented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary porta caval shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P < 0.01). In anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P < 0.01). The venous return and the cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.

Role of transarterial chemoembolization before liver resection for hepatocarcinoma.

The aim of this study was to clarify whether chemoembolization (TACE) before liver resection (LR) can reduce postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and improve disease-free and overall survival. Eighty-nine patients with tumor-stage (TNM) I-II HCC were evaluated for LR. Patients were prospectively allocated to LR alone or TACE plus LR based on their place of residence. Twenty nonlocal patients (24%) were selected for LR, while 69 (77.5%) local patients were selected for TACE plus LR. Following TACE, the tumor stage could be confirmed in only 20 patients (29%) who then underwent LR. Operative mortality was 0%, but in the TACE-LR group, 3 patients died of liver failure between 2 and 5 months after surgery. Early recurrence (<24 months) was 59% for LR versus 20% for TACE plus LR (P <.05). Late recurrence was 18% for LR versus 10% for TACE plus LR (P = not significant [NS]). The overall recurrence rate was 76% for LR versus 30% for TACE plus LR (P <.02). Death due to HCC recurrence was 70% for LR versus 15% for TACE plus LR (P <.05). The overall 1- and 5-year survival rates did not differ significantly (71% to 38% for LR v 85% to 43% for TACE + LR; P = NS), whereas the difference in 1- and 5-year disease-free survival was highly significant (64% to 21% for LR v 82% to 57% for TACE + LR; P <.02). TACE was able to improve the HCC staging process and significantly reduce the incidence of early and overall HCC recurrence and related death after LR; it improved the disease-free interval, but not the overall survival, due to an increase in liver failure in the first 5 months.

Laparoscopic surgery after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Laparoscopic surgery is currently a widely accepted approach to several surgical fields because of its advantages in terms of postoperative pain reduction and easy patient recovery. This approach may be useful even in solid-organ transplantation surgery as a diagnostic or treatment procedure in some surgical complications. From July 1991 to December 1998, we performed 142 liver transplantations on 129 patients. During the postoperative period, many complications occurred. Here we report two cases of intestinal occlusion caused by adhesions and three cases of lymphocele, all approached with laparoscopic surgery. In all cases but one, we were able to complete the surgery by laparoscopic means; in one of the two occlusions, the procedure was switched to laparotomy because of a choledochojejunal anastomosis lesion. The three cases of lymphocele must be considered in a particular manner because such cases, to our knowledge, have never been described in the literature. They always presented with a late-onset right pleural effusion and were located in the retrohepatic, retrogastric, and left paracaval areas, close to the esophageal hiatus. In conclusion, we believe a laparoscopic approach is a useful strategy to solve some surgical complications in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation; however, the use of laparoscopic surgery in this field is strictly connected to the surgeon's experience and versatility.