Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 696, 2023 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The predictive accuracies of screening instruments for identifying home-dwelling old people at risk of hospitalization have ranged from poor to moderate, particularly among the oldest persons. This study aimed to identify variables that could improve the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set for Home Care (MDS-HC) based algorithm, the Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities for Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) Scale, in classifying home care clients' risk for unplanned hospitalization. METHODS: In this register-based retrospective study, factors associated with hospitalization among home care clients aged ≥ 80 years in the City of Tampere, Finland, were analyzed by linking MDS-HC assessments with hospital discharge records. MDS-HC determinants associated with hospitalization within 180 days after the assessment were analyzed for clients at low (DIVERT 1), moderate (DIVERT 2-3) and high (DIVERT 4-6) risk of hospitalization. Then, two new variables were selected to supplement the DIVERT algorithm. Finally, area under curve (AUC) values of the original and modified DIVERT scales were determined using the data of MDS-HC assessments of all home care clients in the City of Tampere to examine if addition of the variables related to the oldest age groups improved the accuracy of DIVERT. RESULTS: Of home care clients aged ≥ 80 years, 1,291 (65.4%) were hospitalized at least once during the two-year study period. Unplanned hospitalization occurred following 15.9%, 22.8%, and 33.9% MDS-HC assessments with DIVERT group 1, 2-3 and 4-6, respectively. Infectious diseases were the most common diagnosis within each DIVERT groups. Many MDS-HC variables not included in the DIVERT algorithm were associated with hospitalization, including e.g. poor self-rated health and old fracture (other than hip fracture) (p 0.001) in DIVERT 1; impaired cognition and decision-making, urinary incontinence, unstable walking and fear of falling (p < 0.001) in DIVERT 2-3; and urinary incontinence, poor self-rated health (p < 0.001), and decreased social interaction (p 0.001) in DIVERT 4-6. Adding impaired cognition and urinary incontinence to the DIVERT algorithm improved sensitivity but not accuracy (AUC 0.64 (95% CI 0.62-0.65) vs. 0.62 (0.60-0.64) of the original DIVERT). More admissions occurred among the clients with higher scores in the modified than in the original DIVERT scale. CONCLUSIONS: Certain geriatric syndromes and diagnosis groups were associated with unplanned hospitalization among home care clients at low or moderate risk level of hospitalization. However, the predictive accuracy of the DIVERT could not be improved. In a complex clinical context of home care clients, more important than existence of a set of risk factors related to an algorithm may be the various individual combinations of risk factors.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Urinary Incontinence , Aged , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Accidental Falls , Fear , Hospitalization , Geriatric Assessment
2.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 13(5): 1129-1136, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35759120

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify predictive case finding tools for classifying the risk of unplanned hospitalization among home care clients utilizing the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC), with special interest in the Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities for Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) Scale. METHODS: A register-based, retrospective study based on the RAI-HC assessments of 3,091 home care clients (mean age 80.9 years) in the City of Tampere, Finland, linked with hospital discharge records. The outcome was an unplanned hospitalization within 180 days after RAI-HC assessment. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and the sensitivity and specificity were determined for the RAI-HC scales: DIVERT, Activities of Daily Living Hierarchy (ADLh), Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), Changes in Health, End-Stage Diseases, Signs, and Symptoms Scale (CHESS), and Method for Assigning Priority Levels (MAPLe). RESULTS: Altogether 3091 home care clients had a total of 7744 RAI-HC assessments, of which 1658 (21.4%) were followed by an unplanned hospitalization. The DIVERT Scale had an AUC of 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.64) when all assessments were taken into account, but its value was poorer in the older age groups (< 70 years: 0.71 (0.65-0.77), 70-79 years: 0.66 (0.62-0.69), 80-89 years: 0.60 (0.58-0.62), ≥ 90 years: 0.59 (0.56-0.63)). AUCs for the other scales were poorer than those of DIVERT, with CHESS nearest to DIVERT. Time to hospitalization after assessment was shorter in higher DIVERT classes. CONCLUSION: The DIVERT Scale offers an approach to predicting unplanned hospitalization, especially among younger home care clients. Clients scoring high in the DIVERT algorithm were at the greatest risk of unplanned hospitalization and more likely to experience the outcome earlier than others.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Home Care Services , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies
3.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 94: 104350, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33516078

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for readmission after geriatric hospital care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1,167 community-dwelling patients aged ≥70 years who were hospitalised in two geriatric hospitals and discharged to their homes over a three-year period. We combined the results of the interRAI-post acute care instrument (interRAI-PAC) with hospital discharge records. Factors associated with readmissions within 90 days following discharge were analysed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 84.5 (SD 6.2) years, and 71% (n = 827) were women. The 90-day readmission rate was 29.5%. The risk factors associated with readmission in the univariate analysis were as follows: age, admission from home vs. acute care hospital, Alzheimer's disease, unsteady gait, fatigue, unstable conditions, Activities of Daily Living Hierarchy Scale (ADLH) score, Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) score, body mass index (BMI), frailty index, bowel incontinence, hearing difficulties, and poor self-rated health. In the multivariable analysis, age of ≥90 years, ADLH ≥1, unsteady gait, BMI <25 or ≥30 kg/m 2 , and frailty remained as risk factors for readmission. Surgical operation during the treatment period was associated with a lower readmission risk. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: InterRAI-PAC performed upon admission to geriatric hospitals revealed patient-related risk factors for readmission. Based on the identified risk factors, we recommend that the patient's functional ability, activities of daily living (ADL) needs, and individual factors underlying ADL disability, as well as nutritional and mobility problems should be carefully addressed and managed during hospitalization to diminish the risk for readmission.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Patient Readmission , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 20(1): 160, 2020 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32370740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Geriatric assessment upon admission may reveal factors that contribute to adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients. The purposes of this study were to derive a Frailty Index (FI-PAC) from the interRAI Post-Acute Care instrument (interRAI-PAC) and to analyse the predictive ability of the FI-PAC and interRAI scales for hospital outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted by combining patient data from interRAI-PAC with discharge records from two post-acute care hospitals. The FI-PAC was derived from 57 variables that fulfilled the Frailty Index criteria. Associations of the FI-PAC and interRAI-PAC scales (ADLH for activities of daily living, CPS for cognition, DRS for mood, and CHESS for stability of health status) with hospital outcomes (prolonged hospital stay ≥90 days, emergency department admission during the stay, and in-hospital mortality) were analysed using logistic regression and ROC curves. RESULTS: The cohort included 2188 patients (mean age (SD) 84.7 (6.3) years) who were hospitalized in two post-acute care hospitals. Most patients (n = 1691, 77%) were discharged and sent home. Their median length of stay was 35 days (interquartile range 18-87 days), and 409 patients (24%) had a prolonged hospital stay. During their stay, 204 patients (9%) were admitted to the emergency department and 231 patients (11%) died. The FI-PAC was normally distributed (mean (SD) 0.34 (0.15)). Each increase of 0.1 point in the FI-PAC increased the likelihood of prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio [95% CI] 1.91 [1.73─2.09]), emergency admission (1.24 [1.11─1.37]), and in-hospital death (1.82 [1.63─2.03]). The best instruments for predicting prolonged hospital stay and in-hospital mortality were the FI-PAC and the ADLH scale (AUC 0.75 vs 0.72 and 0.73 vs 0.73, respectively). There were no differences in the predictive abilities of interRAI scales and the FI-PAC for emergency department admission. CONCLUSIONS: The Frailty Index derived from interRAI-PAC predicts adverse hospital outcomes. Its predictive ability was similar to that of the ADLH scale, whereas other interRAI-PAC scales had less predictive value. In clinical practice, assessment of functional ability is a simple way to assess a patient's prognosis.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Frail Elderly , Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Critical Care/methods , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies
5.
Clin Respir J ; 13(1): 34-42, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480876

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Unnoticed and untreated depression is prevalent among patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. Comorbid depression causes suffering and worsens patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this evaluation was to assess preliminary outcomes of a depression screening protocol among chronic respiratory insufficiency patients at a tertiary care pulmonary outpatient clinic. METHODS: In the depression screening protocol, the patients filled the Depression Scale (DEPS) questionnaire. Patients whose scores suggested depression were offered the opportunity of a further evaluation of mood at a psychiatric outpatient clinic. The outcomes of the protocol were evaluated retrospectively from the patient records. RESULTS: During the period of evaluation, 238 patients visited the outpatient clinic. DEPS was administered to 176 patients (74%), of whom 60 (34%) scored ≥9 (out of 30), thus exceeding the cut-off for referral. However, only 13 patients were referred, as the remainder declined the referral. Finally, seven patients were evaluated at the psychiatric clinic, and they all were deemed depressive. Symptoms of depression were most prevalent among patients with a long smoking history, refractory dyspnoea and a history of depression. CONCLUSION: Depression screening was positive in a third of the patients. The depression screening protocol improved the detection of depression symptoms, but the effects on the patients' treatment and clinical course were small. Rather than referring patients to a psychiatric unit, the evaluation and management of depression should be undertaken at the pulmonary unit.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prevalence , Respiratory Insufficiency/complications , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Healthcare/standards
6.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 78: 114-126, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unplanned hospitalizations and emergency room visits occur frequently among home care clients The aim of this study was to identify typical discharge diagnoses and their associations with patient characteristics among a total of 6812 Finnish home care clients aged ≥63 years who were hospitalized within one year of their first home care assessment. METHODS: A register-based study based on Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessments and nationwide hospital discharge records. The RAI-HC assessments were linked to the hospital discharge records of the participants' first unplanned hospitalization. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of RAI-HC determinants with discharge diagnoses. RESULTS: The most common reason for the first hospitalization was an infectious disease (21%; n = 1446). When hospitalizations were classified according to the main diagnosis, chronic skin ulcers, functional impairment and daily urinary incontinence were associated with hospitalization due to infectious diseases; impaired cognitive capacity, Alzheimer's disease or other dementia and polypharmacy (protective effect) were associated with hospitalizations due to dementia; age of ≥90 years, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and using ≥10 drugs with hospitalizations due to heart diseases; and moderate or strong pain with hospitalization due to musculoskeletal disorders. Previous falls, female sex and an earlier hip fracture were associated with injury-related hospitalizations. Feelings of loneliness increased the odds of hospitalization due to geriatric symptoms without a specific diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics and geriatric syndromes identified using RAI-HC predict the reasons for future hospitalizations among new home care clients.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Hospitalization , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge
7.
J Aging Stud ; 43: 15-22, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29173510

ABSTRACT

The functional ability of older people has come to play a significant role in their care. Policies and public debate promote active aging and the need to maintain functioning in old age, including among older people living in long-term care. This study explores the meanings given to functional ability in the interview talk of long-term care nurses (n=24) and older people living in long-term care (n=16). The study is based on discourse analysis and positioning theory. In this study, accounts of functioning differed between nurses and older residents. For the nurses, functional ability was about the basic functions of everyday life, and they often used formal and theoretical language, whereas for older long-term care residents, functional ability was a more versatile concept. Being active was promoted, particularly in the nurses' talk but also sometimes in residents' talk, thereby reflecting the public discourse about functioning. In their talk, the nurses positioned themselves in relation to functional ability as competent professionals and active caregivers. In residents' talk, we found three positions: an active individual taking care of him or herself, a recipient of help, and a burden to nurses. To move in a direction that promotes activity and rehabilitative care, a better understanding of older people's individual needs and their own views of functional ability is needed.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Attitude of Health Personnel , Long-Term Care , Nurses/psychology , Patients/psychology , Aged , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male
8.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 35(3): 279-285, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28784018

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore changes in self-reported disabilities, health, comorbidities and psychological wellbeing (PWB) in aged cohorts over two decades. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Cross-sectional cohort studies with postal surveys were conducted among community-dwelling people aged 75, 80, 85, 90 and 95 years in 1989 (n = 660), 1999 (n = 2598) and 2009 (n = 1637) in Helsinki, Finland. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported items on disability, self-rated health (SRH), diagnoses and PWB were compared between cohorts of the same age. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for each study year to explore the representativeness of the samples compared to general population of same age. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of the 75-85-year-olds of the later study years reported going outdoors daily, although this group had improvements in both SRH and PWB scores. The number of comorbidities increased over time among 75-85-year-olds. The only significant change that could be verified among 90- and 95-year-olds between 1999 and 2009, was the lower proportion of participants going outdoors daily. The trend of leveling-off in disabilities was not explained by the SMRs (0.90, 0.71 and 0.60 for 1989, 1999 and 2009). CONCLUSIONS: The latest older people's cohorts showed an end to previously reported improvements in disabilities, despite having favorable trends in SRH and PWB. Primary care may be faced with increasing need of appropriate services for their senior members.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Comorbidity , Disabled Persons , Geriatric Assessment , Health Status , Independent Living , Mental Health , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care , Quality of Life , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 65(2): 407-414, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28001292

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors predicting unplanned hospitalization of new home care clients using the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC). DESIGN: A register-based study based on RAI-HC assessments and nationwide hospital discharge records. SETTING: Municipal home care services in Finland. PARTICIPANTS: New Finnish home care clients aged 63 and older (N = 15,700). MEASUREMENTS: Information from home care clients' first RAI-HC assessment was connected to information regarding their first hospitalization over 1 year of follow-up. Multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the independent risk factors for hospitalization. RESULTS: Forty-three percent (n = 6,812) of participants were hospitalized at least once. The strongest independent risk factors were hospitalization during the year preceding the RAI-HC assessment (odds ratio (OR) = 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.87-2.16), aged 90 and older (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.48-1.92), renal insufficiency (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.22-1.69) and using 10 or more drugs (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.26-1.58). Other independent risk factors were male sex, previous emergency department visits or other acute outpatient care use, daily urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, history of falls, cognitive impairment, chronic skin ulcer, pain, unstable health status, housing-related problems, and poor self-rated health. Parkinson's disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer were independent prognostic indicators. A body mass index of 24 kg/m2 or greater and the client's own belief that functional capacity could improve had a protective role. CONCLUSION: Assessing new home care clients using the RAI-HC reveals modifiable risk factors for unplanned hospitalization. Systematic assessment by a multidisciplinary team at the beginning of the service and targeting modifiable risk factors could reduce the risk of unplanned hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Home Care Services , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Polypharmacy , Registries , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Risk Factors
10.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 31(2): 73-8, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23621352

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the possibility of clinically significant drug-alcohol interactions among home-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 65 years. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional assessment of a stratified random sample of 2100 elderly people (≥ 65 years) in Espoo, Finland. The response rate was 71.6% from the community-dwelling sample. The drugs were coded according to their Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification index (ATC DDD 2012). Significant alcohol interactive (AI) drugs were examined according to the Swedish, Finnish, INteraction X-referencing (SFINX) interaction database, as well as concomitant use of central nervous system drugs, hypoglycaemics, and warfarin with alcohol. "At-risk alcohol users" were defined consuming > 7 drinks/week, or ≥ 5 drinks on a typical drinking day, or using ≥ 3 drinks several times/week, "moderate users" as consuming at least one drink/month, but less than 7 drinks/week, and "minimal/non-users" less than one drink/month. RESULTS: Of the total sample (n = 1395), 1142 respondents responded as using at least one drug. Of the drug users, 715 (62.6%) persons used alcohol. The mean number of medications was 4.2 (SD 2.5) among "at-risk users", 4.0 (SD 2.6) among "moderate users", and 5.4 (SD 3.4) among "minimal/non-users" (p < 0.001). The concomitant use of AI drugs was widespread. Among the "at-risk users", "moderate users", and "minimal/nonusers" 42.2%, 34.9%, and 52.7%, respectively, were on AI drugs (p < 0.001). One in 10 of "at-risk users" used warfarin, hypnotics/sedatives, or metformin. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AI drugs is common among older adults, and this increases the potential risks related to the use of alcohol.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Ethanol/pharmacology , Prescription Drugs/pharmacology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Acta Orthop ; 84(1): 44-53, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23244785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High age is associated with increased postoperative mortality, but the factors that predict mortality in older hip and knee replacement recipients are not known. METHODS: Preoperative clinical and operative data on 1,998 primary total hip and knee replacements performed for osteoarthritis in patients aged ≥ 75 years in a single institution were collected from a joint replacement database and compared with mortality data. Average follow-up was 4.2 (2.2-7.6) years for the patients who survived. Factors associated with mortality were analyzed using Cox regression analysis, with adjustment for age, sex, operated joint, laterality, and anesthesiological risk score. RESULTS: Mortality was 0.15% at 30 days, 0.35% at 90 days, 1.60% at 1 year, 7.6% at 3 years, and 16% at 5 years, and was similar following hip and knee replacement. Higher age, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists risk score of > 2, use of walking aids, preoperative walking restriction (inability to walk or ability to walk indoors only, compared to ability to walk > 1 km), poor clinical condition preoperatively (based on clinical hip and knee scores or clinical severity of osteoarthritis), preoperative anemia, severe renal insufficiency, and use of blood transfusions were associated with higher mortality. High body mass index had a protective effect in patients after hip replacement. INTERPRETATION: Postoperative mortality is low in healthy old joint replacement recipients. Comorbidities and functional limitations preoperatively are associated with higher mortality and warrant careful consideration before proceeding with joint replacement surgery.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/mortality , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Osteoarthritis, Hip/mortality , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/mortality , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Ann Med ; 43(4): 292-301, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21254906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. Low serum total cholesterol is frequently associated with worse survival in older people, but mechanisms of this association are poorly understood. AIMS. Characteristics of cholesterol metabolism were related to survival in a random 75 + population sample. METHODS. Serum cholesterol and lathosterol, and sitosterol were measured in random persons (n = 623) of birth cohorts (1904, 1909, and 1914) in 1990, and all persons were followed for 17 years. RESULTS. Total cholesterol declined in old age, and low cholesterol was associated with poor health and multi-morbidity. Cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L was associated with accelerated all-cause mortality (age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.54; 95% CI 1.21-1.97; P < 0.001) and vascular mortality (HR 2.13 (1.42-3.07); P < 0.001). Lathosterol (indicating cholesterol synthesis) and sitosterol (indicating cholesterol absorption) also decreased with deteriorating health. Low lathosterol, sitosterol, and cholesterol predicted mortality additively and independently of each other. When all three sterols were high (> median) or low, the age- and gender-adjusted survival was 9.9 and 5.6 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Lower synthesis and absorption of cholesterol, and low serum cholesterol level are associated with deteriorating health and indicate impaired survival in old age.


Subject(s)
Aging/blood , Cholesterol/blood , Sitosterols/blood , Vascular Diseases/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cause of Death , Cholesterol/biosynthesis , Cognition , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Analysis
14.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 26(11): 1169-76, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21192017

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate what the older adults themselves consider to be the reasons for their alcohol consumption. METHODS: The data were collected with a postal questionnaire from a random sample of 2100 elderly people (≥65 years) living in the medium-sized city of Espoo, Finland. The response rate was 71.6% from the community-dwelling sample. Altogether 868 persons responded that they use alcohol. Of them, 831 gave reasons for their drinking. We defined "at-risk users" as consuming >7 drinks per week, or ≥5 drinks on a typical drinking day, or using ≥3 drinks several times per week. RESULTS: Main reasons given for alcohol consumption were "having fun or celebration" (58.7%), "for social reasons" (54.2%), "using alcohol for medicinal purposes" (20.1%), and "with meals" (13.8%). Younger age groups reported more often than the older age groups that they use alcohol for "having fun or celebration" and "for social reasons." The older age groups used more often "alcohol for medicinal purposes". Men used alcohol more often than women "as pastime" or "as sauna drink". Those defined as "at-risk users" reported using alcohol because of "meaningless life," for "relieving depression," "relieving anxiety," and "relieving loneliness." CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have diverse alcohol consumption habits like people in other age groups. The oldest olds reported that they use alcohol for medicinal purposes. The "at-risk users" admit they use alcohol because of meaningless life, and relieving depression, anxiety, and loneliness.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Motivation , Sex Distribution , Social Environment , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 59(3): 268-74, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15031312

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The search for preventable and remediable risk conditions of cognitive decline is ongoing, but results have thus far been inconsistent. According to the hypothesis of our 10-year prospective study, the predictive values of different risk indicators change over time in a general 75+ population. METHODS: A population-based sample of 75-, 80-, and 85-year-old individuals (n=650) underwent comprehensive clinical examinations in 1990 in Helsinki, Finland. Cognitive function was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and/or Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) at baseline and after 1, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: At baseline, a low MMSE score was associated with age, history of stroke, apolipoprotein E allele epsilon4 (APOE4), and intermittent claudication. After 1 year, cognitive decline was typical of participants suffering from vascular diseases, e.g., heart failure and intermittent claudication. Five-year decline was predicted by the presence of atrial fibrillation (RR [relative risk] 2.8), APOE4 (RR 2.4), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (RR 2.3), diabetes mellitus (RR 2.2), and heart failure (RR 1.8). They also tended to increase 5-year all-cause mortality. At 10 years, the decline associated with APOE4 (RR 3.3), slightly elevated serum ionized calcium (RR 3.3), and feelings of loneliness (RR 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Long follow-up of a general aged population explains several inconsistencies of earlier reports. In 75+ individuals, general ill health is a strong associate of cognitive deficits. The strongest predictors of both cognitive decline and mortality are age, APOE4, manifest vascular diseases, and diabetes. The role of new potential predictors, feelings of loneliness and hypercalcemia, needs clinical testing.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Geriatrics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mortality/trends , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
16.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 3(1): 29-31, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12807564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Three observational studies were performed to examine the use and effectiveness of external hip protectors intended to prevent hip fractures. METHODS: Data were collected by: (1) questionnaire to health centers or homes for the aged to which hip protectors had been sent; (2) comparison of users of hip protectors and control subjects;(3) comparison of users of hip protectors, comparing time wearing versus not wearing their hip protectors for part of the study period. OBSERVATIONS: The use of external hip protectors is a good, cost-effective adjunctive tool in preventing hip fractures. However, improvements in design are still needed to increase compliance.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL