ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of topical ivermectin 1% ointment, for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to review electronic medical records of patients seen between January 2017 and December 2022, who had a diagnosis of Demodex blepharitis, treated with topical ivermectin 1% with at least 6 months of follow-up (Centro de Ojos Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina). The presence of collarettes was graded from 0 to 4. An imaging system (Keratograph) was used, to evaluate tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIKBUT), and degree of conjunctival redness. In addition, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test was performed. Results were compared before and after ivermectin treatment, which was performed once a day for 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 2157 patients (4314 eyes) were included. The mean age was 50.43 ± 15.3 years, and the follow-up time was 26.1 ± 8.5 months. No one discontinued treatment due to intolerance, although 14 cases (0.6 %) reported occasional discomfort. The grade of collarettes decreased with statistical significance, from 3.37 ± 0.7 to 0.1 ± 0.3 (p < 0.01), as well as conjunctival redness from 1.32 ± 0.3 to 0.94 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01) and OSDI score from 58.74 ± 17.9 to 17.1 ± 10.5 (p = 0.02). TMH and NIKBUT improved without statistical difference. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivermectin 1% topical ointment, once daily for 2 months, was effective in reducing the presence of collarettes and in improving symptoms in patients with Demodex blepharitis.
Subject(s)
Blepharitis , Mite Infestations , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Ivermectin , Retrospective Studies , Blepharitis/diagnosis , Blepharitis/drug therapy , Mite Infestations/diagnosis , Mite Infestations/drug therapy , OintmentsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To review the prevalence and describe the characteristics, of cases with late-onset intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) keratopathy in a multicenter study. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric case-series study was performed in a specialized keratoconus service, from Buenos Aires, Argentina. An electronic clinical chart from patients with ICRS keratopathy between January 1999 and January 2019 was reviewed. We included cases with late-onset distal-apical ICRS keratopathy, which was defined as a persistent corneal lesion developed 12 months or later after implantation, located over, around, or closer to the ICRS. All the surgeries were performed by a manual corneal tunnel creation technique. Samples were taken to rule out infectious etiology. RESULTS: From 5217 eyes that underwent ICRS implantation, 13 cases (0.24%) were detected. The keratopathy onset was 72 ± 42.98 months (29-133) after ICRS implantation. Cultures were negative in all cases. An ICRS exchange was made for five cases in stage I and four in stage II. Four cases presented with partial ICRS extrusion in stage III. ICRS exchange was possible in two of them and a penetration keratoplasty was necessary for the rest. All cases remained stable 1 year after surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: A late-onset distal-apical ICRS keratopathy was detected with low prevalence (0.24%) in a large sample. It was classified into three stages according to its severity. Different treatments were selected for each stage, obtaining stable results 1 year after treatment.
Subject(s)
Keratoconus , Prosthesis Implantation , Humans , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Prostheses and Implants , Retrospective Studies , Corneal Topography , Keratoconus/diagnosis , Keratoconus/epidemiology , Keratoconus/surgery , Eye, Artificial , Corneal Stroma/surgery , Corneal Stroma/pathology , Refraction, OcularABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) considering different characteristics: glaucoma subtypes and lens status. METHODS: A retrospective case-series study was designed to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP), and the number of IOP-lowering medications, used by glaucoma patients treated with MP-TSCPC between 2016 and 2019. Cases had a follow-up period of 12 months. Achieving an IOP reduction higher than 20%, or the decrease of at least one IOP-lowering medication, was considered a successful outcome. The same population was analyzed by classifying them in two groups as: glaucoma subtypes and lens status. The baseline spherical equivalent (SE) was also calculated for considering association with the achieved IOP. RESULTS: A total of 86 eyes were included. In most cases, IOP and IOP-lowering medications were decreased with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001), and all of them had a successful outcome. The percentage of IOP drop oscillated between 25.9% (open-angle glaucoma sub-group) and 37.5% (pseudoexfoliative glaucoma sub-group), 12 months after surgery. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p 0.20 and 0.32 for glaucoma subtypes and lens status, respectively). The Pearson's coefficient obtained was low for the SE and IOP association, at the 12 -month postoperative mark (- 0.009; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MP-TSCPC treatment was successful in decreasing IOP and IOP-lowering medications, in different glaucoma subtypes. Differences between groups (glaucoma subtypes, phakic and pseudophakic eyes) were not statistically significant. No association was found between the SE and the IOP achieved value after MS-TSCPC treatment.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Refractive Errors , Humans , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Laser Coagulation , Visual Acuity , Glaucoma/surgery , Glaucoma/etiology , Intraocular Pressure , Refractive Errors/etiology , Ciliary Body/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Evaluate the clinical outcomes of the secondary piggyback add-on IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus for pseudophakic patients previously implanted with a monofocal IOL, who pursue a spectacle-free option after IOL surgery. METHODS: A prospective case series including seven pseudophakic patients who underwent an in-the-bag monofocal IOL implantation. All eyes underwent a piggyback IOL implantation of the new sulcus designed A4 AddOn IOL in the ciliary sulcus as a secondary procedure for pseudophakic patients pursuing a spectacle-free option for near and intermediate distance after IOL surgery. RESULTS: Seven eyes from six patients were included in this study, from which 4 (71.43%) were female, with a mean age of 58.33 ± 3.5 years (range 54-63; 95% CI 54.66, 62.01). The postoperative spherical equivalent at the 3-month visit was -0.10 m ± 0.82. Also, the UDVA was 0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR, the UIVA 0.01 ± 0.03, and the UNVA 0.01 ± 0.03 3 months after their surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The A4 AddOn multifocal IOL's secondary piggyback implant is an efficient alternative for monofocal pseudophakic patients seeking presbyopia solutions. This sulcus-designed IOL provides an optimal visual outcome for near and distance vision.