Outcome of early versus late primary embolization in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with a ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (rBAVM) would benefit from an early embolization. METHODS: rBAVM treated first by embolization between March 2002 and May 2022 were included. Embolization was defined early (Group 1) when performed within 10 days postbleeding. If later, embolization was considered late (Group 2). Demographic and rBAVM data were compared between the groups. High-risk bleeding components and reasons for deferring embolization were retrieved. Primary endpoint was rebleeding. Secondary endpoints were good functional outcome (FO, modified Rankin Scale mRS ≤ 2) and angiographic occlusion. Predictors of rebleeding and FO were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 105 patients were recruited (N = 34 in Group 1; N = 71 in Group 2). No rebleeding was noted before, during or after the first embolization session in the early embolization group. Late embolization depended on missed diagnosis and referral pattern. Eleven patients (10.5%) suffered a rebleeding, of whom N = 3 before embolization (only in Group 2), N = 5 periembolization (N = 2 at the second embolization session in Group 1) and N = 3 spontaneous more than 30 days postembolization. More high-risk components were embolized in Group 1 (19/34; 55.9 vs 17/71; 23.9%; p = .011). Rebleeding rates, FO at last FU (90.9% vs 74.3%) and occlusion rates (80.8% vs 88.5%) did not differ between the groups. Glasgow coma scale ≤ 8 predicted rebleeding, rebleeding correlated with poor FO. CONCLUSION: Early embolization did prevent rebleeding. The overall rebleeding risk was linked to bleeding before late embolization and bleeding at the second embolization. Rebleeding predicted the final FO.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Pediatric Portal Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the technical outcome, clinical outcome, and patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in pediatric portal hypertension (PHT). METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP registries was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An a priori protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database. Original full-text articles on pediatric patients (sample size of ≥5 patients with upper age limit of 21 years) with PHT who underwent TIPS creation for any indication were included. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 284 patients (average-weighted age of 10.1 years) were included, with an average-weighted follow-up of 3.6 years. TIPS was technically successful in 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.5%-97.1%) of patients, with a major adverse event rate of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.7-6.9) and adjusted hepatic encephalopathy rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.6-6.3). The pooled 2-year primary and secondary patency rates were 61.8% (95% CI, 50.0-72.4) and 99.8% (95% CI, 96.2%-100.0%), respectively. Stent type (P = .002) and age (P = .04) were identified as a significant source of heterogeneity for clinical success. In subgroup analysis, the clinical success rate was 85.9% (95% CI, 77.8-91.4) in studies with a majority of covered stents, and 87.6% (95% CI, 74.1-94.6) in studies with a median age of 12 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that a TIPS is a feasible and safe treatment for pediatric PHT. To improve clinical outcome and patency on the long term, the use of covered stents should be encouraged.

Correction to: No evidence of improved efficacy of covered stents over uncovered stents in percutaneous palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective randomized trial.

On request from the Editors, the authors would like to clarify the following: the patient cohorts in the publications "No evidence of improved efficacy of covered stents over uncovered stents in percutaneous palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective randomized trial".

No evidence of improved efficacy of covered stents over uncovered stents in percutaneous palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether covered stents show a higher efficacy than uncovered stents in percutaneous treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. METHODS: Patients with obstructive jaundice caused by an unresectable hilar malignancy were included after failed endoscopic intervention in a prospective randomized trial comparing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene (ePTFE-FEP)-covered nitinol stents with uncovered nitinol stents. Exclusion criteria were as follows: primary tumors existing more than 3 months, a biliodigestive anastomosis, previous stenting, and a Karnofsky score of less than 50. Safety, clinical success, and adjuvant chemotherapy were compared as well as occlusion rate, patency, and survival. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included. One patient was post hoc excluded. Fourteen patients who died within 7 days and one patient without patency data were excluded from patency analysis. Serious adverse events (p = 0.4), 30-day mortality (p = 0.5), and clinical success (p = 0.8) were equivalent for both stent groups. Twenty-one out of 61 (34%) patients in the covered and 24/58 (41%) in the uncovered stent groups received adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.5). Occlusion rate was 54% (27/50) in the covered stent group and 57% (31/54) in the uncovered stent group (p = 0.8). Median patency was 229 days (95% CI 113-345) for covered stents and 130 days (95% CI 75-185) for uncovered stents (p = 0.1). Median survival in patients with covered stents was 79 days (95% CI 52-106) and with uncovered stents 92 days (95% CI 60-124) (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In malignant hilar biliary obstruction, there is no evidence that ePTFE-FEP-covered stents are superior to uncovered stents in terms of safety, clinical success, adjuvant chemotherapy, patency, or survival. KEY POINTS: • Percutaneous palliation of hilar biliary obstruction is feasible with both uncovered and covered stents. • Clinical success in terms of bilirubin decrease and adjuvant chemotherapy is achievable with both stents. • Thirty-day mortality is considerable when stenting is also offered to patients with a low performance status.