Comparison of Radiographic, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Retained Stingray Barb: A Cadaveric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Stingray envenomations are a common marine animal injury for which it is important to identify and remove retained barbs to prevent secondary infection. The optimal imaging modality in stingray foreign body detection is not well characterized in the existing literature. In this study, we compared the accuracy of plain radiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting stingray barbs in the human foot and ankle. METHODS: This cadaveric study included a 1:1 randomization to the presence or absence of barbs in 24 sample injuries of human cadaveric foot and ankle specimens. Physicians trained in emergency medicine and radiology performed ultrasound examinations on each specimen and interpreted the presence or absence of a barb. Participants also interpreted x-ray images in the same manner. MRI scans were separately interpreted by a musculoskeletal radiology attending. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: The 19 participants included 14 (74%) trained in emergency medicine and 5 (26%) trained in radiology. Forty-seven percent were residents, 42% faculty, and 11% fellows. X-ray was associated with the highest sensitivity of 94% for the identification of a retained barb, followed by MRI (83%) and ultrasound (70%). MRI was associated with the highest specificity of 100%, followed by x-ray (98%) and ultrasound (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Retained stingray barbs can lead to secondary infection after envenomation. In human cadaveric specimens, x-ray demonstrated the highest sensitivity, MRI demonstrated the highest specificity, and ultrasound demonstrated lower sensitivity and specificity.

Refractive change in response to acute hyperbaric stress in refractive surgery patients.

PURPOSE: To determine whether acute hyperbaric stress affects visual acuity or refractive power after keratorefractive surgery. SETTING: Clinical multiplace hyperbaric chamber and ophthalmology clinic, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. METHODS: This prospective convenience sample study included 3 groups: 3 patients who had had bilateral myopic radial keratotomy (RK); 2 who had had bilateral myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); and 4 control subjects who had no previous corneal refractive surgery or ocular pathology but had a myopic refractive error (-1.25 to -8.38 diopters [D]) similar to that in the treated patients before refractive surgery. One additional patient had had unilateral LASIK only and was included in the LASIK and control groups. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest spherocylindrical refractive error, and intraocular pressure were measured at baseline, at 4 atmospheres absolute (atm abs), and on return to ambient pressure. Corneal pachymetry and keratometry were measured at baseline and on return to ambient pressure. RESULTS: The mean BSCVA changed from 0.06 logMAR (20/25 Snellen equivalent) at baseline to 0.10 logMAR (20/25) at 4 atm abs in the RK group and from 0.00 logMAR (20/20) to -0.06 logMAR (20/15) in the LASIK group; it did not change in the control group. The mean refractive error changed from 0.25 D at baseline to 0.50 D at 4 atm abs in the RK group, from -0.90 to -1.02 D in the LASIK group, and from -4.58 to -4.53 D in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Acute hyperbaric stress did not appear to alter refractive power after corneal surgery.