Hospital Admissions in Pediatric Patients With Tracheostomies Based on Rurality and Insurance Status.

OBJECTIVE: Determine whether rurality or public insurance status is associated with greater 30-day readmission after tracheostomy in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. METHODS: Patients within PHIS who underwent tracheostomy from 2013 to 2017 were included. Rural status was defined by rural-urban commuting area codes. Insurance status was based on the primary payer. All-cause 30-day readmissions and tracheostomy-related readmissions were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to test for differences in readmissions between cohorts. RESULTS: Among patients, 1092 were rural, and 4329 were publicly insured, with no significant association between rurality and insurance. Compared to nonrural patients, rural patients were more frequently white, less frequently ventilator dependent, and more likely discharged home rather than to a care facility. Publicly insured patients were more frequently non-white. Twenty-eight percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Odds of 30-day readmission were lower in rural patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.95, p = .01) but higher in publicly insured (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09-1.42, p = .001) controlling for age at tracheostomy, sex, race, and ventilator dependence. The odds of tracheostomy-related admission did not differ by rurality but were higher in publicly insured children (1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.88, p = .03). CONCLUSION: Readmission within 30 days following tracheostomy was more likely in publicly insured patients and less likely in rural patients. These findings help identify at-risk patients when considering discharge planning and follow-up. More work is needed to understand long-term tracheostomy outcomes in these groups.

Outpatient versus observation/inpatient parotidectomy: patient factors and perioperative complications.

The objective of this manuscript is to review a single institution's experience with superficial or total parotidectomy in outpatient and observation/inpatient groups. All patients who underwent superficial or total parotidectomy between 2009 and 2015 were identified. Patients were excluded if they had undergone concurrent surgery such as neck dissection, had prior radiation treatment or surgery at the operative site. Main outcomes were perioperative complications in both groups. 215 consecutive patients were included in the study, 116 (54%) patients in the inpatient group and 99 (46%) in the outpatient group. Aside from a higher observed rate of cardiac disease in the outpatient group (24.2 vs. 11.2%, p = 0.014) and larger mean body mass index (BMI) in the inpatient group (32.448 vs. 30.034, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences for age, sex or smoking status. Average operative time differed between groups with 2 h 42 min for inpatients and 2 h 18 min for outpatients (p < 0.001). There were 26 complications in the inpatient group (22.4%, including two hematomas) and 8 in the outpatient group (8.1%). The rate of seroma/sialocele formation was significantly higher in the inpatient group at 15.5% (n = 18) compared with the outpatient group at 3% (n = 3, p = 0.001). Our study shows that parotidectomy, superficial or total, was performed safely as an outpatient procedure without significant increase in complications when compared to patients observed for at least one night after surgery.