Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Knee joint distraction (KJD), a joint-preserving surgery for severe osteoarthritis (OA), provides clinical and structural improvement and postpones the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluates 9-year treatment outcome and identifies characteristics predicting long-term treatment success. DESIGN: Patients with severe tibiofemoral OA (n = 20; age<60 years) indicated for TKA were treated with KJD. Questionnaires, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used for evaluation. Survival after treatment was analyzed, where 'failure' was defined by TKA over time. RESULTS: 9-year survival was 48%, and 72% for men (compared to 14% for women; P = 0.035) and 73% for those with a first-year minimum joint space width (JSW) increase of >0.5 mm (compared to 0% for <0.05 mm; P = 0.002). Survivors still reported clinical improvement compared to baseline (ΔWOMAC +29.9 points (95%CI 16.9-42.9; P = 0.001), ΔVAS -46.8 mm (-31.6-61.9; P < 0.001)). Surprisingly, patients getting TKA years after KJD still reported clinical improvement although less pronounced (ΔWOMAC +20.5 points (-1.8-42.8; P = 0.067), ΔVAS -25.4 mm (-3.2-47.7; P = 0.030)). Survivors showed long-lasting minimum JSW increase (baseline 0.3 mm (IQR 1.9), follow-up 1.3 mm (2.5); P = 0.017) while 'failures' did not (baseline 0.4 mm (1.8), follow-up 0.2 mm (1.5); P = 0.161). First-year minimum JSW on radiographs and cartilage thickness increase on MRI predict 9-year survival (HR 0.05 and 0.12, respectively; both P < 0.026). Male gender was associated with survival (HR 0.24; P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: KJD shows long-lasting clinical and structural improvement. In addition to a greater survival rate for males (>two out of three), the initial cartilage repair activity appears to be important for long-term clinical success.

Technical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction for treatment of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder characterized by joint tissue damage and pain. Knee joint distraction has been introduced as a joint preserving surgical procedure to postpone knee arthroplasty. An often used standard externally fixation device for distraction poses a burden to patients due to the absence of joint flexion during the 6weeks treatment. Therefore, a personalized articulating distraction device was developed. The aim of this study was to test technical feasibility of this device. METHODS: Based on an often applied rigid device, using equal bone pin positions and connectors, a hinge mechanism was developed consisting of a cam-following system for reproducing the complex joint-specific knee kinematics. In support, a device was developed for capturing the joint-specific sagittal plane articulation. The obtained kinematic data were translated into joint-specific cam shapes that were installed bilaterally in the hinge mechanism of the distraction device, as such providing personalized knee motion. Distraction of 5mm was performed within a range of motion of 30deg. joint flexion. Pre-clinical evaluation of the working principle was performed on human cadaveric legs and system stiffness characteristics were biomechanically evaluated. FINDINGS: The desired range of motion was obtained and distraction was maintained under physiologically representative loading. Moreover, the joint-specific approach demonstrated tolerance of deviations from anatomical and alignment origin during initial placement of the developed distraction device. INTERPRETATION: Articulation during knee distraction is considered technically feasible and has potential to decrease burden and improve acceptance of distraction therapy. Testing of clinical feasibility is warranted.

Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Both, knee joint distraction as a relatively new approach and valgus-producing opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), are knee-preserving treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of knee joint distraction compared to HTO has not been reported. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with medial knee joint OA with a varus axis deviation of <10° were randomized to either knee joint distraction (n = 23) or HTO (n = 46). Questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Joint space width (JSW) as a surrogate measure for cartilage thickness was determined on standardized semi-flexed radiographs at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: All patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) improved significantly over 1 year (at 1 year p < 0.02) in both groups. At 1 year, the HTO group showed slightly greater improvement in 4 of the 16 PROMS (p < 0.05). The minimum medial compartment JSW increased 0.8 ± 1.0 mm in the knee joint distraction group (p = 0.001) and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm in the HTO group (p < 0.001), with minimum JSW improvement in favour of knee joint distraction (p = 0.05). The lateral compartment showed a small increase in the knee joint distraction group and a small decrease in the HTO group, leading to a significant increase in mean JSW for knee joint distraction only (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Cartilaginous repair activity, as indicated by JSW, and clinical outcome improvement occurred with both, knee joint distraction and HTO. These findings suggest that knee joint distraction may be an alternative therapy for medial compartmental OA with a limited mechanical leg malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Prediction of cartilaginous tissue repair after knee joint distraction.

BACKGROUND: For young patients (<65years), knee joint distraction (KJD) may be a joint-saving treatment option for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Distracting the femur from the tibia by five millimeters for six to eight weeks using an external fixation frame results in cartilaginous tissue repair, in addition to clinical benefits. This study is a first attempt to predict the degree of cartilaginous tissue repair after KJD. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients received KJD. At baseline and at one year of follow-up, mean and minimum joint space width (JSW) of the most-affected compartment was determined on standardized radiographs. To evaluate the predictive ability of baseline characteristics for JSW at one year of follow-up, multivariable linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Mean JSW±SD of the most affected compartment increased by 0.95±1.23mm to 3.08±1.43mm at one year (P<0.001). The minimum JSW increased by 0.94±1.03mm to 1.63±1.21mm at one year of follow-up (P<0.001). For a larger mean JSW one year after KJD, only Kellgren & Lawrence grade (KLG) at baseline was predictive (Regression coefficient (ß)=0.47, 95% CI=0.18 to 0.77, P=0.002). For a larger minimum JSW, KLG (ß=0.46, 95% CI=0.19 to 0.73, P=0.001) and male gender (ß=0.52, 95% CI=0.06 to 0.99, P=0.028) were statistically predictive. Eight weeks of distraction time neared significance (ß=0.44, 95% CI=-0.05 to 0.93, P=0.080). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients treated with KJD, males with higher KLG had the best chance of cartilaginous tissue repair by distraction.

Six weeks of continuous joint distraction appears sufficient for clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a surgical joint-preserving treatment in which the knee joint is temporarily distracted by an external frame. It is associated with joint tissue repair and clinical improvement. Initially, patients were submitted to an eight-week distraction period, and currently patients are submitted to a six-week distraction period. This study evaluates whether a shorter distraction period influences the outcome. METHODS: Both groups consisted of 20 patients. Clinical outcome was assessed by WOMAC questionnaires and VAS-pain. Cartilaginous tissue repair was assessed by radiographic joint space width (JSW) and MRI-observed cartilage thickness. RESULTS: Baseline data between both groups were comparable. Both groups showed an increase in total WOMAC score; 24±4 in the six-week group and 32±5 in the eight-week group (both p<0.001). Mean JSW increased 0.9±0.3mm in the six-week group and 1.1±0.3mm in the eight-week group (p=0.729 between groups). The increase in mean cartilage thickness on MRI was 0.6±0.2mm in the eight-week group and 0.4±0.1mm in the six-week group (p=0.277). CONCLUSIONS: A shorter distraction period does not influence short-term clinical and structural outcomes statistically significantly, although effect sizes tend to be smaller in six week KJD as compared to eight week KJD.

Patient characteristics as predictors of clinical outcome of distraction in treatment of severe ankle osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a slowly progressive joint disease. Joint distraction can be a treatment of choice in case of severe OA. Prediction of failure will facilitate implementation of joint distraction in clinical practice. Patients with severe ankle OA, who underwent joint distraction were included. Survival analysis was performed over 12 years (n = 25 after 12 years). Regression analyses were used to predict failures and clinical benefit at 2 years after joint distraction (n = 111). Survival analysis showed that 44% of the patients failed, 17% within 2 years and 37% within 5 years after joint distraction (n = 48 after 5 years). Survival analysis in subgroups showed that the percentage failure was only different in women (30% after 2 years) versus men (after 11 years still no 30% failure). In the multivariate analyses female gender was predictive for failure 2 years after joint distraction. Gender and functional disability at baseline predicted more pain. Functional disability and pain at baseline were associated with more functional disability. Joint distraction shows a long-term clinical beneficial outcome. However, failure rate is considerable over the years. Female patients have a higher chance of failure during follow-up. Unfortunately, not all potential predictors could be investigated and other clinically significant predictors were not found.

Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of severe osteoarthritis (OA) in relatively young patients is challenging. Although successful, total knee prosthesis has a limited lifespan, with the risk of revision surgery, especially in active young patients. Knee joint distraction (KJD) provides clinical benefit and tissue structure modification at 1-year follow-up. The present study evaluates whether this benefit is preserved during the second year of follow-up. METHODS: Patients included in this study presented with end-stage knee OA and an indication for total knee replacement (TKR); they were less than 60 years old with a VAS pain ≥60 mm (n = 20). KJD was applied for 2 months (range 54-64 days) and clinical parameters assessed using the WOMAC questionnaire and VAS pain score. Changes in cartilage structure were measured using quantitative MRI, radiography, and biochemical analyses of collagen type II turnover (ELISA). RESULTS: Average follow-up was 24 (range 23-25) months. Clinical improvement compared with baseline (BL) was observed at 2-year follow-up: WOMAC improved by 74% (P < 0.001) and VAS pain decreased by 61% (P < 0.001). Cartilage thickness observed by MRI (2.35 mm (95%CI, 2.06-2.65) at BL) was significantly greater at 2-year follow-up (2.78 mm (2.50-3.09); P = 0.03). Radiographic minimum joint space width (JSW) (1.1 mm (0.5-1.7) at BL) was significantly increased at 2-year follow-up as well (1.7 mm (1.1-2.3); P = 0.03). The denuded area of subchondral bone visualized by MRI (22% (95%CI, 12.5-31.5) at BL) was significantly decreased at 2-year follow-up (8% (3.6-12.2); P = 0.004). The ratio of collagen type II synthesis over breakdown was increased at 2-year follow-up (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement by KJD treatment is sustained for at least 2 years. Cartilage repair is still present after 2 years (MRI) and the newly formed tissue continues to be mechanically resilient as shown by an increased JSW under weight-bearing conditions.

Joint distraction results in clinical and structural improvement of haemophilic ankle arthropathy: a series of three cases.

The incidence of haemophilic arthropathy in multiple joints decreased due to treatment with clotting factor. Nowadays patients are enabled to live a rather normal life, resulting in more (sports) trauma-induced arthropathy in isolated joints like the ankle. As surgical treatment options, fusion of the tibiotalar joint and total ankle replacement are available. Both standard treatments have complications and therefore an alternative treatment is desired. In this study, treatment of haemophilic ankle arthropathy with joint distraction was explored. Three patients with haemophilic ankle arthropathy were treated with joint distraction using an Ilizarov external fixator. Clinical outcomes like function, participation and pain were evaluated in retrospect with three different questionnaires: haemophilia activities list, impact on participation and autonomy and the Van Valburg questionnaire. Structural changes were assessed blinded on X-ray by the Pettersson score and ankle images digital analysis (AIDA) and by an MRI score. All three patients were very satisfied with the clinical outcome of the procedure. They reported a clear improvement for self-perceived functional health, participation in society and autonomy and pain. Partial ankle joint mobility was preserved in the three patients. The Pettersson score remained the same in one patient and slightly improved in the two other patients, while joint space width measured by AIDA and the MRI score demonstrated improvement for all three patients after ankle distraction. This study suggests that joint distraction is a promising treatment for individual cases of haemophilic ankle arthropathy, without additional risk of bleedings during treatment.

Inhibition of COX-2 by celecoxib in the canine groove model of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro studies showed a beneficial effect of celecoxib on proteoglycan turnover and content of osteoarthritic cartilage. In the present study we evaluated whether these favourable effects of celecoxib could also be demonstrated in vivo. METHODS: In 24 Beagle dogs, osteoarthritis (OA) was induced in one knee according to the groove model. The animals were divided into three groups and received oral placebo or 100 or 200 mg celecoxib daily, starting directly after surgery. After 15 weeks joint tissue from all dogs was analysed. RESULTS: Induction of OA resulted in macroscopic and histological damage of cartilage, changes in cartilage proteoglycan turnover, loss of cartilage matrix proteoglycans and slight synovial inflammation, all characteristic of early OA. Surprisingly, none of the parameters was significantly changed upon celecoxib treatment. Synovial fluid prostaglandin E(2) levels were dose-dependently diminished by celecoxib, demonstrating that the celecoxib had reached the joint in sufficient amounts. Using an in vitro setup, canine cartilage under degenerative conditions was favourably influenced by celecoxib, demonstrating that canine cartilage is sensitive to celecoxib. CONCLUSION: The present study showed a chondroneutral effect of celecoxib on the characteristics of experimentally induced OA in vivo, in contrast to the observed beneficial effect in vitro. It could be that celecoxib had been beneficial to degenerated cartilage in vivo but that these effects were counteracted by increased loading of the affected joint and the associated progression of OA, occurring because of the well-known analgesic effects of celecoxib.

Prolonged clinical benefit from joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disabling joint disease affecting more than 10% of the adult population. No validated disease-modifying treatment is available. Joint distraction is a relatively new approach to the treatment of severe ankle OA. Short-term (3 years) clinical benefit has been proven, but long-term effects remain to be evaluated. METHODS: Patients with severe OA of the tibio-talar joint, who had been treated with Ilizarov joint distraction more than 7 years previously, were included. Pre-treatment data were obtained by retrospective analysis using questionnaires and patients' charts. Post-treatment assessments were undertaken using the same questionnaires and by physical examination. Three approaches were used and results were compared: the van Valburg score, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Retrospectively and prospectively obtained data were available from eight patients for comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 27 patients with severe ankle OA treated with Ilizarov joint distraction could be traced. Appropriate retrospective data could not be obtained from three patients. Six out of the 22 patients (27%) were failures. In 16 patients (73%), significant improvement in all clinical parameters was observed using each of the three approaches. Good correlations were found between the results of the three methods of assessment and retrospectively obtained pre-treatment values were very similar to the prospective data. CONCLUSIONS: In 73% of the patients, significant clinical benefit from joint distraction of severe OA ankles was maintained for at least 7 years. There is, however, a need for further research to try and predict which patients will not respond to this unconventional form of major surgical intervention.

Steady progression of osteoarthritic features in the canine groove model.

OBJECTIVE: Recently we described a canine model of osteoarthritis (OA), the groove model with features of OA at 10 weeks after induction, identical to those seen in the canine anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) model. This new model depends on cartilage damage accompanied by transient intensified loading of the affected joint. The present study evaluates this groove model at 20 and 40 weeks after induction, to assess whether the osteoarthritic features progress in time. METHODS: Grooves were made in the femoral condyles of one knee without damaging the subchondral bone. After surgery the dogs were forced to load the experimental joint 3 days per week (4 hours/day) for 20 weeks by fixing the contralateral control limb to the trunk. After 20 weeks and 40 weeks (the last 20 weeks normal loading) joints were analysed for biochemical and histological features of OA. RESULTS: All biochemical cartilage parameters were indicative of OA and all these parameters suggested a slow progression of degeneration over time from 20 to 40 weeks after induction, statistically significant for synthesis and content of proteoglycans as well as Mankin grade. Synovial inflammation, which was mild, diminished slightly in time. CONCLUSION: The degenerative joint damage in the canine groove model is slowly progressive over time in the first year. The cartilage degeneration is induced by a one-time trauma and is not primarily mediated by synovial inflammation, which gives this model unique characteristics compared to presently available models for studying early osteoarthritic features in vivo. In the groove model the effect of treatment of cartilage damage is not counteracted by permanent joint instability or hampered by inflammation. Therefore, the model might be more sensitive to detect effects of therapy, aimed at cartilage protection and repair.

The canine 'groove' model, compared with the ACLT model of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The frequently used anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) model of osteoarthritis (OA) in the dog, makes use of a permanent trigger (joint instability) for inducing degenerative changes. The present study evaluates a canine model of degenerative cartilage damage, mimicking OA, which is induced without making use of permanent joint instability. METHODS: The articular cartilage of the weight-bearing areas of the femoral condyles in one knee of ten beagle dogs was damaged by making grooves, without damaging the subchondral bone. Surgery was followed by 10 weeks intensified loading of the affected joint. Subsequently, joint damage and inflammation were evaluated. The effects were compared with those of the ACLT model. RESULTS: Histological analysis showed chondrocyte clusters around cartilage lesions and moderate loss of proteoglycans in the 'groove' model. Synovial inflammation was mild. Biochemical analysis of cartilage showed changes in matrix proteoglycan turnover, proteoglycan content, and collagen damage, all characteristics of OA. Synovial fluid MMP-1, -3 and -13 activity was enhanced. Changes were found in condyles and plateau, were similar for all animals tested, and were similar to the changes observed in the ACLT model. CONCLUSION: The presently described canine 'groove' model shows characteristics identical to those seen in the ACLT model but differs in a way that the changes are induced without joint instability. The latter is expected to make the 'groove' model more sensitive to treatment.

Ankle images digital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis on standard radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: Reliable evaluation of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis of osteoarthritic joints is difficult. The present study describes a new digital method to analyse standard radiographs of the ankle. DESIGN: Standardized radiographs were taken of the ankle of 12 patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA) under full weight-bearing conditions, before treatment and 1 year after initiation of treatment. Treatment consisted of 3 months distraction of the tibio-talar joint, for which clinical benefit has been shown previously. The width of the joint space was measured on digitized images of the radiographs by means of the newly developed semi-automatic digital technique called AIDA (Ankle Images Digital Analysis) and by means of the most widely used conventional analogue measurements. In addition, AIDA was used to assess subchondral sclerosis by measuring the intensity of the radiograph at fixed positions at the bone-cartilage interface. RESULTS: AIDA appeared to be a reliable method for measuring small changes in joint space width and subchondral sclerosis because the intra- and interobserver variation was small. Mean JSW for two observers was 1.96 and 2.00 mm, with mean differences between two observations of 0.05 and -0.01, respectively. Mean subchondral sclerosis in the tibia was 1.52 and 1.61 with mean differences between two observations of, respectively, 0.00 and 0.03. In addition to conventional measurements, AIDA could demonstrate a decrease in subchondral sclerosis as a result of joint distraction of 71% and 69% after 1 year for talus and tibia, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of AIDA is preferable to the conventional analogue method for evaluating the severity of ankle OA, because the method provides quantitative data not only for the joint space width but also for subchondral sclerosis.

Arthrodesis of the knee after an infected arthroplasty using the Ilizarov method.

We treated 15 patients by arthrodesis of the knee after removal of an infected total knee arthroplasty, using an Ilizarov ring fixator. Eight had a failed arthrodesis by another technique. The mean age of the patients was 75 years, the mean duration of retention of the frame was 28 weeks, the mean treatment time 51 weeks, and the mean follow-up 52 months. All but one knee fused at the first attempt, a rate of union of 93%. The incidence of complications related to treatment was 80%. The length of treatment and rates of complication were attributed to advanced age and the adverse local clinical factors in these patients. The Ilizarov method is a promising technique for achieving arthrodesis under these circumstances.

The psychological and social functioning of 14 children and 12 adolescents after Ilizarov leg lengthening.

We studied the psychological and social impact of the Ilizarov leg lengthening procedure in 26 patients (aged 6-17 years), who had completed the treatment at least 2 months previously. Measurements of depression and anxiety were performed preoperatively and at follow-up. Questions about functioning at school, daily life activities and treatment-related experiences were answered by the patient and his/her parents. The school or work results showed no significant decline during the lengthening procedure. Serious sleeping problems occurred during the procedure. There was no subjective improvement in physical skill after the procedure and almost one-fourth of the children still had complaints about their leg. We conclude that the Ilizarov procedure caused no serious psychological disturbances.

Joint distraction in treatment of osteoarthritis (II): effects on cartilage in a canine model.

OBJECTIVE: From a clinical point of view, joint distraction as a treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) of hip and ankle has been demonstrated to be very promising. Pain, joint mobility and functional ability, the most important factors for a patient with severe OA, all improved. Although radiographic joint space enlargement in a significant number of patients suggested cartilage repair, actual cartilage repair remains difficult to evaluate. Therefore the present study was initiated to evaluate the actual effects of joint distraction on cartilage. METHODS: For this purpose a canine model for OA, anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) was used. Sixteen weeks after ACLT articulating Ilizarov joint distraction of the knee was carried out. Absence of mechanical contact between articular surfaces and presence of intra-articular intermittent fluid pressure, characteristics of Ilizarov joint distraction, were confirmed. Twenty-five weeks after ACLT joint tissue of the dogs was analyzed. RESULTS: Biochemical analysis showed that after joint distraction the abnormal cartilage proteoglycan (PG) metabolism, characteristic for OA, had changed to a level found in control joints. Moreover, a mild degree of inflammation, present after ACLT, was reduced upon joint distraction. PG-content and histological cartilage degeneration had not (yet) improved within the time of treatment. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that the promising clinical results of Ilizarov joint distraction in patients with OA are accompanied by changes in cartilage metabolism. A change in proteoglycan turnover, indicating normalization of overall chondrocyte function, might in the long term, with normal joint use, lead to actual repair of cartilage.

Joint distraction in treatment of osteoarthritis: a two-year follow-up of the ankle.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease with an incidence exceeding 10% of the adult population. In end stages, OA can result in severe restriction of activity and consequent disability. For these severe cases of OA, no effective remedy is available yet. Joint distraction is a new experimental approach in treatment of OA. Studied in retrospect it appeared that this treatment results in prolonged clinical improvement in the case of ankle OA. Presently the results of a prospective two-year follow-up are given. METHODS: Patients with severe ankle OA, who were considered for joint fusion (arthrodesis), were treated with distraction, by use of an Ilizarov external ring fixator. Distraction was carried out for 3 months during which full weight bearing (walking) was allowed. Standardized clinical examination was conducted before and at yearly intervals after treatment, including physical examination, functional ability questionnaire, pain scale, joint mobility, and radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: More than two thirds of the patients improved significantly as shown by physical examination, functional ability questionnaires and pain scale; effects were progressive in the second year of follow-up. On average, joint mobility and radiographic joint space were preserved, whilst improvement was observed in a significant number of patients. DISCUSSION: Results of the present prospective study confirm the findings of the previous retrospective study and suggest that Ilizarov joint distraction is a promising treatment for severe ankle OA, at least delaying the need for a joint fusion. Considering the high prevalence of OA and the lack of a remedy for this disorder, Ilizarov joint distraction as a treatment for OA may have great medical, social and economic impact.

A sporadic case of tetramelic mirror-image polydactyly and unilateral tibial hypoplasia without associated anomalies.

We report a sporadic case of tetramelic mirror-image polydactyly in combination with unilateral tibial aplasia. No chromosomal or other associated abnormalities were found. The appearance and function of the upper and lower limbs were improved by surgery.