Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 32(9): 1086-1094, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38997468

ABSTRACT

Myhre syndrome (MS, MIM 139210) is a rare multisystemic disorder caused by recurrent pathogenic missense variants in SMAD4. The clinical features have been mainly documented in childhood and comprise variable neurocognitive development, recognizable craniofacial features, a short stature with a pseudo-muscular build, hearing loss, thickened skin, joint limitations, diverse cardiovascular and airway manifestations, and increased fibrosis often following trauma or surgery. In contrast, adults with MS are underreported obscuring potential clinical variability. Here, we describe 24 adults with MS, including 17 diagnosed after the age of 18 years old, and we review the literature on adults with MS. Overall, our cohort shows a milder phenotype as well as lower mortality rates compared to what has been published in literature. Individuals with a codon 500 variant in SMAD4 present with a more pronounced neurodevelopmental and systemic phenotype. However, in contrast to the literature, we observe cardiovascular abnormalities in individuals with the p.(Arg496Cys) variant. In addition, we describe scoliosis as a new manifestation and we report fertility in two additional males with the p.(Arg496Cys). In conclusion, our study contributes novel insights into the clinical variability of MS and underscores the importance of variant-specific considerations, and we provide recommendations for the management of MS in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Phenotype , Smad4 Protein , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Smad4 Protein/genetics , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Intellectual Disability/pathology , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Cryptorchidism/genetics , Cryptorchidism/pathology , Adolescent , Growth Disorders/genetics , Growth Disorders/pathology , Middle Aged , Mutation, Missense , Facies , Genetic Association Studies , Hand Deformities, Congenital
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 47(2): 103224, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37244865

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the incidence of and indications for sperm donor restriction due to suspected/confirmed disease risk, and the future treatment choices of patients using these sperm donors? DESIGN: This single-centre retrospective study involved donors who had restrictions on the use of their imported spermatozoa from January 2010 to December 2019, and current or previous recipients. Indications for sperm restriction and the characteristics of patients undergoing medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatment with these specimens at the time of restriction were collected. Differential characteristics of women who decided on whether or not to contintue the procedure were assessed. Characteristics potentially leading to treatment continuation were identified. RESULTS: Of 1124 sperm donors identified, 200 (17.8%) were restricted, most commonly for multifactorial (27.5%) and autosomal recessive (17.5%) disorders. The spermatozoa had been used for 798 recipients, of whom 172, receiving spermatozoa from 100 donors, were informed about the restriction and constituted the 'decision cohort'. The specimens from the restricted donors were accepted by 71 (approximately 40%) patients, with 45 (approximately 63%) eventually using the restricted donor for their future MAR treatment. The odds of accepting the restricted spermatozoa decreased with increasing age (OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.800-0.918, P < 0.001) and the time between MAR treatment and the restriction date (OR 0.806, 95% CI 0.713-0.911, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Donor restriction due to suspected/confirmed disease risk is relatively frequent. This affected a relevant number of women (around 800), of whom 172 (approximately 20%) had to decide whether or not to use these donors further. Although donor screening is being performed thoroughly, there remain health risks for donor children. Realistic counselling of all stakeholders involved is necessary.


Subject(s)
Semen , Tissue Donors , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Spermatozoa
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL