Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(1): 100748, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36108911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been suggested as a strategy to reduce antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization. Although probiotics are known to improve gastrointestinal symptoms, this has not been studied during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic to reduce: (1) standard-of-care antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization and colony counts and (2) gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: In a double-blind fashion, 109 healthy adult pregnant people were randomized to Florajen3 probiotic or placebo capsules once daily from 28 weeks' gestation until labor onset. Baseline vaginal and rectal study swabs for group B Streptococcus colony-forming units and microbiome analysis were collected at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Standard-of-care vaginal to rectal group B Streptococcus swabs were collected from all participants at 36 weeks' gestation and determined the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Data collection included solicitation of adverse events, demographic information, Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment score, yogurt ingestion, sexual activity, and vaginal cleaning practices. RESULTS: A total of 83 participants completed the study to 36 weeks' gestation with no adverse events. Standard-of-care group B Streptococcus colonization was 20.4% in the control group and 15.4% in probiotic group participants (-5%; P=.73). The relative risk for positive standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.40) times higher in the control group than in the probiotic group (P=.55). There were no differences in median vaginal (P=.16) or rectal (P=.20) group B streptococcus colony-forming units at baseline or at 36 weeks (vaginal P>.999; rectal P=.56). Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment scores were similar at baseline (P=.19), but significantly decreased in probiotic group participants at 36 weeks (P=.02). No covariates significantly altered group B Streptococcus colonization. Significantly more Florajen3 bacteria components were recovered from the vaginal-rectal samples of probiotic group participants (32%; P=.04) compared with controls. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provided insufficient evidence for the clinical application of the Florajen3 probiotic intervention to reduce standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization. The prevalence of group B Streptococcus was lower than expected in the study population, and intervention adherence was poor. Probiotic bacteria colonization of the genitourinary tract occurred more in intervention group participants than in controls and significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Probiotics , Streptococcus agalactiae , Adult , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Vagina/microbiology , Gestational Age , Antibiotic Prophylaxis
2.
Midwifery ; 105: 103208, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyse studies of the efficacy of probiotics to reduce antenatal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonisation. PARTICIPANTS: Antenatal participants with known positive GBS colonisation or unknown GBS status. INTERVENTION: Probiotic interventions containing species of Lactobacillus or Streptococcus. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The systematic review included 10 studies. Five articles contained in vitro studies of probiotic interventions to determine antagonistic activity against GBS. Six clinical trials of probiotics to reduce antenatal GBS were systematically reviewed and meta-analysed. The meta-analysis revealed that the use of an antenatal probiotic decreased the probability of a positive GBS result by 44% (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 8.7%, 194.1%, p = 0.02) (n = 709). However, only one clinical trial of 10 had a low risk of bias. KEY CONCLUSIONS: The probiotic interventions subjected to in vitro testing showed antagonistic activity against GBS through the mechanisms of acidification, immune modulation, and adhesion. The findings of the meta-analysis of the clinical trials revealed that probiotics are a moderately effective intervention to reduce antenatal GBS colonisation. More well-controlled trials with diverse participants and with better elucidation of variables influencing GBS colonisation rates are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Probiotic interventions appear to be a safe and effective primary prevention strategy for antenatal GBS colonisation. Application of this low-risk intervention needs more study but may reduce the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in countries or regions where antenatal GBS screening is used. Midwives can be instrumental in conducting and supporting larger well-controlled clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Midwifery , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Probiotics , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Streptococcus , Streptococcus agalactiae
3.
J Prof Nurs ; 37(2): 451-458, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867104

ABSTRACT

In this article, a Nursing Workforce Diversity grant-funded project examined the social determinants of health (SDH) including diverse high school and baccalaureate nursing students. All involved students were from educationally and/or economically disadvantaged backgrounds and/or underrepresented minority groups. The purpose of this article is to report the project outcome data and analysis gathered from students' experiences of SDH, using the collaborative method, listening sessions. The project staff and student nurses discussed SDH with high school students, who then identified and prioritized key SDH in their neighborhoods during a series of facilitated listening sessions in their schools. Initial analysis included reviewing, with the students, the notes taken during the sessions, resulting in a list of SDH to address. As a secondary analysis, the listening session tapes were transcribed and independently coded and examined by project staff. Six themes evolved that illustrate the depth of understanding of the complex challenges of SDH experienced by students in their local communities. Based on student-determined priorities, the project staff developed programs to meet the identified SDH needs at both high schools. Nursing and other health professionals are in ideal positions to collaborate with schools to create programming interventions for addressing SDH effectively into the future.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff , Students, Nursing , Humans , Minority Groups , Social Determinants of Health
5.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 34(3): 239-250, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32697544

ABSTRACT

The microbiome is composed of many organisms and is impacted by an intricate exchange between genetics and environmental factors. The perinatal microbiome influences both the developing fetus and the pregnant person. The purpose of this article is to describe the tests that are currently available for laboratory analysis of the perinatal microbiome in relationship to probiotic interventions. This article focuses on the bacterial component of the microbiome. Although adverse outcomes associated with the perinatal microbiome have been studied, a comprehensive understanding of the physiologic perinatal microbiome is still emerging. Early efforts to influence the perinatal microbiome through probiotics are currently under investigation. Unique terminology is defined, and the microbial composition of perinatal microbiota is summarized. The outcomes of studies of antenatal probiotics are summarized. Microbiome testing and analysis are defined and compared. Implications for perinatal care and probiotics research are presented.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/microbiology , Perinatal Care/methods , Premature Birth/microbiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Prenatal Care/methods
6.
Hisp Health Care Int ; 18(4): 232-240, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349557

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mexican origin (MO) women comprise the largest Hispanic subgroup of Latinas in the United States. This subgroup has high incidences of obesity and associated chronic diseases. Modifiable risk factors for these include unhealthy diets and eating patterns. Efforts to understand eating patterns of Hispanics have focused on primarily first-generation Hispanics. The purpose of this study was to explore U.S.-born MO women's descriptions about eating patterns. METHOD: A qualitative exploratory-descriptive study, using a thematic analysis approach, was employed. Fifteen MO women were interviewed. The participants were second to fourth generation and reported higher educational attainment, middle-income socioeconomic brackets, and English proficiency compared with previous groups studied. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (a) personal agency, (b) relationships with people about food, (c) cultural and familial influences, (d) environments, and (e) time and money. Themes comprised multiple factors to classify the varied aspects of the women's eating patterns. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights about descriptions of eating patterns from a subgroup, generational, and gender-specific perspective that extended beyond acculturative and homogeneous group viewpoints to a broader structural view. The structural layers that affected the women's eating patterns were multifaceted and complex.


Subject(s)
Diet/ethnology , Feeding Behavior/ethnology , Mexican Americans/psychology , Acculturation , Adolescent , Adult , Cultural Characteristics , Environment , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Middle Aged , Personal Autonomy , Qualitative Research , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , United States , Young Adult
7.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 49(3): 305-314, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the nine-item Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment (AP-GI-SA) instrument. DESIGN: Single-group prospective design. SETTING: Urban prenatal clinic serving a diverse population. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 45 pregnant women. METHODS: Participants completed the AP-GI-SA before a scheduled prenatal care appointment. We used Bayesian structural equation modeling to evaluate the construct validity of the scale and assessed known-groups validity. We assessed reliability through maximal reliability coefficient estimate and measured internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: Participants completed the instrument in 2 minutes or less. Construct validity was supported by confirmatory factor analysis (posterior predictive p value = 0.49, gamma-hat = 0.970, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.065), which indicated that the single-factor model is a plausible data-generative model for GI symptoms. The maximal reliability coefficient of 0.75 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.67 supported reliability. Average AP-GI-SA scores were the highest for women in the third trimester. Of all nine GI symptoms, heartburn in the third trimester received the highest score. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide preliminary support for the validity and reliability of the AP-GI-SA. The instrument may be used as a measure in intervention studies where GI symptoms of pregnancy are an outcome. The AP-GI-SA could also be useful in clinical settings to quickly evaluate GI symptoms.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Psychometrics/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Symptom Assessment/standards , Adult , Bayes Theorem , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data
8.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 33(1): 35-51, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676461

ABSTRACT

The influence of microbial factors on adverse perinatal outcomes has become the focal point of recent investigations, with particular interest in the role of the microbiome and probiotic interventions. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and critique the most recent evidence about these factors as they relate to pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia (PEC), preterm birth (PTB), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched for articles published in English in the last 10 years with the concepts of the microbiome, probiotics, and PEC, PTB, or GDM. Forty-nine articles were eligible for full-text review. Five articles were excluded, leaving 44 articles that met all the eligibility criteria. The relationships between the microbiome and the risk for PEC, PTB, and GDM are not fully elucidated, although probiotic interventions seem beneficial in decreasing PEC and GDM risk. Probiotic interventions targeting bacterial vaginosis and elimination of infection in women at risk for PTB appear to be beneficial. More research is needed to understand the contributions of the microbiome to adverse perinatal outcomes. Probiotic interventions appear to be effective in reducing risk for select outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/microbiology , Microbiota/drug effects , Pre-Eclampsia/microbiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/microbiology , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Risk Assessment
9.
J Nurs Educ ; 57(10): 590-597, 2018 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30277543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, little research has been conducted regarding individuals' stories about not initially being successful on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses. An unsuccessful licensure examination attempt may affect the individual personally and profoundly in ways that could influence their future success. METHOD: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted once with 15 RNs who were initially unsuccessful on the licensure examination and subsequently passed. Data analyses were conducted using both manual and electronic coding through thematic identification. Rigor was ensured by meeting quality criteria for qualitative research. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (a) Pressures all Around, (b) the Stigma of Being Unsuccessful, (c) Correcting the Problems, and (d) Ultimate Triumph in Discovery. CONCLUSION: Following their initial unsuccessful National Council Licen-sure Examination for Registered Nurses results, participants were deeply affected, but after accepting help from family, friends, nursing instructors, and managers, they were able to move forward, change their approaches, and become RNs. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(10):590-597.].


Subject(s)
Achievement , Educational Measurement , Licensure, Nursing , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Students, Nursing/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Life Change Events , Male , United States
10.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 61(3): 339-55, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27218592

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Probiotics are a complementary and integrative therapy useful in the treatment and prevention of urogenital infections in women. This study extends the work of researchers who systematically investigated the scientific literature on probiotics to prevent or treat urogenital infections. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of probiotics for prevention and/or treatment of urogenital infections in adult women from January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2015. We searched in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Dissertations and Theses, and Alt-HealthWatch. After removing duplicates and studies that did not meet inclusion criteria, 20 studies were reviewed. All included at least one species of Lactobacillus probiotic as an intervention for treatment or prevention of urogenital infections. Data extracted included samples, settings, study designs, intervention types, reported outcomes, follow-up periods, and results. We evaluated all randomized controlled trials for risk of bias and made quality appraisals on all studies. RESULTS: Fourteen of the studies focused on bacterial vaginosis (BV), 3 on urinary tract infections (UTIs), 2 on vulvovaginal candidiasis, and one on human papillomavirus (HPV) as identified on Papanicolaou test. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of design, intervention, and outcomes. Four studies were of good quality, 9 of fair, and 7 poor. Probiotic interventions were effective for treatment and prevention of BV, prevention of recurrences of candidiasis and UTIs, and clearing HPV lesions. No study reported significant adverse events related to the probiotic intervention. DISCUSSION: The quality of the studies in this systematic review varied. Although clinical practice recommendations were limited by the strength of evidence, probiotic interventions were effective in treatment and prevention of urogenital infections as alternatives or co-treatments. More good quality research is needed to strengthen the body of evidence needed for application by clinicians.


Subject(s)
Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal/therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/therapy , Vaginosis, Bacterial/therapy , Female , Humans , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 45(1): 62-70, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26815799

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of breastfeeding peer counseling on the breastfeeding experiences of African American mothers who participated in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Two WIC clinics in Southeast Wisconsin were used for recruitment and data collection. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of nine African American mothers participated in one of two focus groups. METHODS: The women responded to a series of open-ended questions about their breastfeeding experiences and the effect of breastfeeding peer counselors (BPCs). Content and thematic analyses were used to analyze patterns related to the influence of BPCs on breastfeeding. RESULTS: Four themes were categorized: Educating With Truth, Validating for Confidence, Countering Others' Negativity, and Supporting With Solutions. Mothers in this study expressed positive reactions to educational, emotional, and social support from BPCs. The mothers noted that the contact they had with BPCs had a direct positive influence on their breastfeeding experiences. However, the contact from BPCs varied between the two WIC clinics. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the positive effects of BPCs on breastfeeding experiences among African American WIC participants. Findings from this study can guide future explorations using BPCs. Interventions are needed to develop standardized guidelines to bring about homogeneity of, better access to, and greater use of BPCs.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Counseling , Maternal Behavior , Professional Role , Adult , Black or African American/psychology , Breast Feeding/ethnology , Breast Feeding/psychology , Counseling/education , Counseling/methods , Counseling/standards , Emotional Intelligence , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Maternal Behavior/ethnology , Maternal Behavior/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Preference , Peer Influence , Poverty/psychology , Qualitative Research , Social Support , Wisconsin
13.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 43(3): 294-304, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24754328

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of an oral prenatal probiotic on group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization and to demonstrate the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial. DESIGN: This pilot study was an open-label, two-group quasi-experiment. SETTING: An urban central city nurse-midwifery and wellness center serving a diverse population. PARTICIPANTS: Ten pregnant participants received the oral probiotic (Florajen3) taken once daily, and 10 participants served as controls. METHODS: A questionnaire on dietary practices, vaginal cleansing, sexual history, and symptoms and GBS colony count samples were taken at 28-, 32-, and 36-weeks gestation. RESULTS: Participants in the probiotic group reported no adverse events or minor side effects; one half reported improved gastrointestinal symptoms. Although two women in each group had positive qualitative prenatal GBS cultures at 36 weeks, the probiotic group participants had lower quantitative GBS colony counts. The eight GBS negative averaged 90% probiotic adherence compared with two GBS positive women who averaged 68%. Yogurt ingestion was inversely related (p = .02) to GBS colonization. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal probiotic therapy has the potential to reduce GBS colonization. The potential of the probiotic intervention appears to be linked to daily adherence. A controlled clinical trial with a larger, adequately powered sample is feasible and justified.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification , Administration, Oral , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Colony Count, Microbial , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Patient Selection , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/methods , Rectum/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , United States , Urban Population , Vagina/microbiology
14.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 27(4): 288-301; quiz E1-2, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24164813

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this integrative review was to identify, critique, and synthesize the maternal and neonatal evidence on the prenatal use of probiotics and prebiotics to inform perinatal health professionals. A comprehensive literature search resulted in 37 studies of prenatal probiotics and 1 on antepartal prebiotics published from 1990 through 2011 that reported maternal, fetal, and/or neonatal outcomes. The methodologic quality of the studies reviewed was high, although investigators used different probiotic combinations and inconsistently reported perinatal clinical outcomes. The extraction of perinatal outcome variables resulted in identification of 9 maternal and 5 neonatal categories. Prenatal probiotics significantly reduced the incidence of bacterial vaginosis, increased colonization with vaginal Lactobacillus and intestinal Lactobacillus rhamnosus, altered immune markers in serum and breast milk, improved maternal glucose metabolism, and reduced the incidence of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. Antepartally, probiotics were associated with significantly higher counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactococcus lactis (healthy intestinal flora) in neonatal stool. Prenatal prebiotics significantly increased maternal intestinal Bifidobacterium. No adverse events were reported and there was evidence of safety and tolerance of prenatal probiotics and prebiotics in the scientific investigations reviewed. It is recommended that in future investigations of prenatal probiotics researchers explicitly report maternal and neonatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fetal Blood/immunology , Milk, Human/immunology , Prebiotics , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/immunology , Probiotics , Biomarkers , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/methods , Probiotics/classification , Probiotics/metabolism , Probiotics/pharmacology
16.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 25(4): 320-8; quiz 329-30, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22071615

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Examining prenatal breast-feeding self-efficacy and infant feeding decisions among African American women using a mixed-method approach. A black feminist philosophy was used to keep women's experiences as the central research focus. METHOD: The Prenatal Breast-feeding Self-efficacy Scale was used to determine differences between intended breast-feeders and formula users among 59 women. Seventeen narrative interviews were conducted to analyze postpartum accounts of actual feeding practices. RESULTS: Both groups (intended breast- or formula-feeders) demonstrated confidence in their ability to breast-feed. Women planning to breast-feed (M = 82.59, SD = 12.53) scored significantly higher than anticipated formula users (M = 70, SD = 15.45), P = .001 (2-tailed). Four of the six themes emerging from narrative analysis were similar to categories of self-efficacy: performance accomplishments, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasions, and physiological reactions. In addition, themes of social embarrassment and feelings of regret were identified. CONCLUSION: Although African American women in this study rated themselves overall as confident with breast-feeding, several narratives about actual feeding choices indicated ambivalence. Women planning to breast-feed need continued support from their healthcare providers throughout the childbearing year. Furthermore, prenatal and immediate postpartum opportunities may exist for nurses to encourage breast-feeding among individuals who initially plan formula use.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health/ethnology , Black or African American/psychology , Breast Feeding/ethnology , Maternal Behavior/ethnology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Self Efficacy , Adult , Anecdotes as Topic , Bottle Feeding/ethnology , Breast Feeding/psychology , Choice Behavior , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mothers/education , Mothers/psychology , Nursing Methodology Research , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
Birth ; 38(3): 256-65, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21884234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perinatal hospice is an option for women who learn during pregnancy that their fetuses are affected by terminal conditions and choose to continue their affected pregnancies. These women face emotional pain and the impending loss of their fetuses or infants. The aims of this study were to explore the experiences of perinatal hospice mothers, to gather knowledge useful to health professionals, and to guide future research. METHODS: Narrative analysis was performed using the personal stories of 15 women who continued pregnancies affected by lethal fetal anomalies. RESULTS: The participants identified themselves as mothers and their fetuses or newborns as babies. Mothers valued caring for and interacting with their babies. Health professionals who affirmed their status as mothers, the value of their babies, and the significance of their losses were perceived as supportive. Invalidating attitudes and behavior caused significant distress among mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal care of perinatal hospice mothers supports the development of maternal identity and contact between mothers and newborns when desired. Professionals who care for perinatal hospice mothers can affirm their motherhood through their behavior and attitudes.


Subject(s)
Bereavement , Congenital Abnormalities/mortality , Hospice Care , Maternal-Fetal Relations/psychology , Mother-Child Relations , Perinatal Care , Professional-Patient Relations , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospice Care/psychology , Hospice Care/standards , Humans , Mothers/psychology , Perinatal Care/standards , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Self Concept , Self Report , Social Support , Young Adult
18.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 25(2): 133-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21540687

ABSTRACT

Advanced practice nurses, including midwives, are well positioned to conduct, participate, or both in both basic and translational research to improve the outcomes and processes of perinatal care. This article contains suggestions for future research by perinatal advanced practice nurses, conceptualized around a scale to promote balance in outcomes. More research is needed in a number of areas, examples include collaborative practice, normal birth, and translation of the evidence concerning skin-to-skin practice. Health disparities; maternal, neonatal, and infant morbidity and mortality; formula feeding; and other vulnerabilities need more research to decrease these problematic outcomes. Advanced practice nurses are encouraged to be actively involved in perinatal research, to help confront and reduce health disparities, and to apply evidence in practice, broadly promoting wellness for women and their families.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Infant Welfare , Neonatal Nursing/standards , Women's Health , Advanced Practice Nursing/trends , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Midwifery , Needs Assessment , Neonatal Nursing/trends , Nursing Research/standards , Nursing Research/trends , Perinatal Care/standards , Perinatal Care/trends , Risk Assessment , United States
19.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 25(1): 21-31, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21311266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) To broadly explore the experiences of women who chose to continue pregnancies affected by lethal fetal diagnoses and (2) to develop knowledge useful to nurses and other healthcare professionals who provide perinatal hospice (PH) care. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study using narrative analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen women who learned during their pregnancies of a lethal fetal diagnosis and chose to continue the affected pregnancies. METHOD: Participants' stories of their PH experiences were recorded in face-to-face interviews. A qualitative approach using narrative analysis was used to identify themes and develop suggestions for care. RESULTS: The element of time was prevalent in mothers' stories. Some aspects of mothers' experiences continued, particularly feelings of love and connection to their babies. Mothers also reported evolving changes in their thoughts and feelings. Personal changes such as increased compassion, faith, and strength were frequently mentioned. Mothers described transient phases of highs and lows. Drawing personal meanings or life lessons was the main way mothers connected their experiences to their present lives. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers' descriptions of their experiences can enhance nurses' understanding of perinatal loss. Established care practices, such as birth planning and creating mementoes, were supported. Nurses can help mothers experiencing loss by elucidating and reflecting their personal meanings.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/nursing , Continuity of Patient Care , Hospice Care/methods , Mothers/psychology , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations , Perinatal Care/methods , Adult , Anecdotes as Topic , Attitude to Death , Bereavement , Congenital Abnormalities/psychology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL