Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 96
Filter
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 105, 2024 04 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest that the subset of patients with heart failure related CS (HF-CS) now predominate critical care admissions for CS. There are no dedicated HF-CS randomised control trials completed to date which reliably inform clinical practice or clinical guidelines. We sought to identify aspects of HF-CS care where both consensus and uncertainty may exist to guide clinical practice and future clinical trial design, with a specific focus on HF-CS due to acute decompensated chronic HF. METHODS: A 16-person multi-disciplinary panel comprising of international experts was assembled. A modified RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness methodology was used. A survey comprising of 34 statements was completed. Participants anonymously rated the appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 to 9 (1-3 as inappropriate, 4-6 as uncertain and as 7-9 appropriate). RESULTS: Of the 34 statements, 20 were rated as appropriate and 14 were rated as inappropriate. Uncertainty existed across all three domains: the initial assessment and management of HF-CS; escalation to temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS); and weaning from tMCS in HF-CS. Significant disagreement between experts (deemed present when the disagreement index exceeded 1) was only identified when deliberating the utility of thoracic ultrasound in the immediate management of HF-CS. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted several areas of practice where large-scale prospective registries and clinical trials in the HF-CS population are urgently needed to reliably inform clinical practice and the synthesis of future societal HF-CS guidelines.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Shock, Cardiogenic , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/therapy , Consensus , Hospitalization
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529950

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bleeding and thrombotic complications compromise outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and/or microaxial flow pumps like the Impella™. Antithrombotic practices are an important determinant of the coagulopathic risk, but standardization in the antithrombotic management during pMCS is lacking. This survey outlines European practices in antithrombotic management in adults on pMCS, making an initial effort to standardize practices, inform future trials, and enhance outcomes. METHODS: This online cross-sectional survey was distributed through digital newsletters and social media platforms by the Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. The survey was available from April 17th to May 23rd, 2023. The target population were European clinicians involved in care for adults on pMCS. RESULTS: We included 105 responses from 26 European countries. Notably, 72.4% of the respondents adhered to locally established anticoagulation protocols, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) being the predominant anticoagulant (Impella™: 97.0% and V-A ECMO: 96.1%). A minority, 10.8% and 14.5%, respectively, utilized anti-factor-Xa assay with activated partial thromboplastin time in parallel for UFH monitoring during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support. Anticoagulant targets varied across institutions. Following acute coronary syndrome without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 54.0% and 42.7% administered dual antiplatelet therapy during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support, increasing to 93.7% and 84.0% after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial heterogeneity in antithrombotic practices emerged from participants' responses, potentially contributing to variable device-associated bleeding and thrombotic complications.

4.
STAR Protoc ; 5(1): 102831, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277268

ABSTRACT

We present a protocol for the rapid postmortem bedside procurement of selected tissue samples using an endoscopic endonasal surgical technique that we adapted from skull base surgery. We describe steps for the postmortem collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, a nasopharyngeal swab, and tissue samples; the clean-up procedure; and the initial processing and storage of the samples. This protocol was validated with tissue samples procured postmortem from COVID-19 patients and can be applied in another emerging infectious disease. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Khan et al. (2021)1 and Khan et al. (2022).2.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Skull Base/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Olfactory Mucosa/surgery , Frontal Lobe/surgery
5.
Lancet Microbe ; 5(3): e247-e260, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a severe superinfection with the fungus Aspergillus affecting patients who are critically ill with COVID-19. The pathophysiology and the role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in this infection are largely unknown. We aimed to characterise the immune profile, with a focus on neutrophils and NET concentrations, of critically ill patients with COVID-19, with or without CAPA. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, observational study in two patient cohorts, both recruited at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. We included adults aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the intensive care unit because of COVID-19 between March 31, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and who were included in the previous Contagious trial (NCT04327570). We investigated the immune cellular landscape of CAPA versus COVID-19 only by performing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Bronchoalveolar lavage immune cell fractions were compared between patients with CAPA and patients with COVID-19 only. Additionally, we determined lower respiratory tract NET concentrations using biochemical assays in patients aged 18 years and older who were admitted to the intensive care unit because of severe COVID-19 between March 15, 2020, and Dec 31, 2021, for whom bronchoalveolar lavage was available in the hospital biobank. Bronchoalveolar lavage NET concentrations were compared between patients with CAPA and patients with COVID-19 only and integrated with existing data on immune mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage and 90-day mortality. FINDINGS: We performed scRNA-seq of bronchoalveolar lavage on 43 samples from 39 patients, of whom 36 patients (30 male and six female; 14 with CAPA) were included in downstream analyses. We performed bronchoalveolar lavage NET analyses in 59 patients (46 male and 13 female), of whom 26 had CAPA. By scRNA-seq, patients with CAPA had significantly lower neutrophil fractions than patients with COVID-19 only (16% vs 33%; p=0·0020). The remaining neutrophils in patients with CAPA preferentially followed a hybrid maturation trajectory characterised by expression of genes linked to antigen presentation, with enhanced transcription of antifungal effector pathways. Patients with CAPA also showed depletion of mucosal-associated invariant T cells, reduced T helper 1 and T helper 17 differentiation, and transcriptional defects in specific aspects of antifungal immunity in macrophages and monocytes. We observed increased formation of NETs in patients with CAPA compared with patients with COVID-19 only (DNA complexed with citrullinated histone H3 median 15 898 ng/mL [IQR 4588-86 419] vs 7062 ng/mL [775-14 088]; p=0·042), thereby explaining decreased neutrophil fractions by scRNA-seq. Low bronchoalveolar lavage NET concentrations were associated with increased 90-day mortality in patients with CAPA. INTERPRETATION: Qualitative and quantitative disturbances in monocyte, macrophage, B-cell, and T-cell populations could predispose patients with severe COVID-19 to develop CAPA. Hybrid neutrophils form a specialised response to CAPA, and an adequate neutrophil response to CAPA is a major determinant for survival in these patients. Therefore, measuring bronchoalveolar lavage NETs could have diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with CAPA. Clinicians should be wary of aspergillosis when using immunomodulatory therapy that might inhibit NETosis to treat patients with severe COVID-19. FUNDING: Research Foundation Flanders, KU Leuven, UZ Leuven, VIB, the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, the European Regional Development Fund, la Caixa Foundation, the Flemish Government, and Horizon 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracellular Traps , Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Antifungal Agents , Critical Illness , COVID-19/complications , Respiratory System , Sequence Analysis, RNA
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(2): 361-370, 2024 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37691392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a frequent superinfection in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with increased mortality rates. The increasing proportion of severely immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 who require mechanical ventilation warrants research into the incidence and impact of CAPA during the vaccination era. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric, observational study. We collected data from adult patients with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of University Hospitals Leuven, a tertiary referral center, between 1 March 2020 and 14 November 2022. Probable or proven CAPA was diagnosed according to the 2020 European Confederation for Medical Mycology/International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ECMM/ISHAM) criteria. RESULTS: We included 335 patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage sampling was performed in 300 (90%), and CAPA was diagnosed in 112 (33%). The incidence of CAPA was 62% (50 of 81 patients) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycosis Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) host factor-positive patients, compared with 24% (62 of 254) in host factor-negative patients. The incidence of CAPA was significantly higher in the vaccination era, increasing from 24% (57 of 241) in patients admitted to the ICU before October 2021 to 59% (55 of 94) in those admitted since then. Both EORTC/MSGERC host factors and ICU admission in the vaccination era were independently associated with CAPA development. CAPA remained an independent risk factor associated with mortality risk during the vaccination era. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EORTC/MSGERC host factors for invasive mold disease is associated with increased CAPA incidence and worse outcome parameters, and it is the main driver for the significantly higher incidence of CAPA in the vaccination era. Our findings warrant investigation of antifungal prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Adult , Animals , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/complications , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/epidemiology , Immunocompromised Host
7.
Int J Cardiol ; 399: 131690, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Impella™ is increasingly used in cardiogenic shock. However, thromboembolic and bleeding events are frequent during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we aimed to explore the optimal anticoagulation regime for pMCS to prevent thromboembolism and bleedings. METHODS: This hypothesis-generating multi-center cohort study investigated 170 patients with left-Impella™ support. We (A) compared bleeding/thrombotic events in two centers with therapeutic range (TR-aPTT) activated partial thromboplastin time (60-80s) and (B) compared events of these centers with one center with intermediate range aPTT (40-60s). RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in patients' characteristics. In centers aiming at TR-aPTT, major bleeding was numerically lower with aPTT <60s within 48 h of left-Impella™ support, versus patients that achieved the aimed aPTT of ≥60s [aPTT ≥60s: 22 (37.3%) vs. aPTT<60s 14 (23.7%); Hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 (95%) CI, 0.28-1.38; p = 0.234]. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE) did not differ between groups. In comparison of centers, TR-aPTT strategy showed higher major bleeding rates [TR: 8 (47.1%) vs. intermediate range: 1 (5.9%); HR, 0.06 (95%) CI, 0.01-0.45; p = 0.006]. MACCE were lower in the intermediate range aPTT group as well [TR 12 (70.6%) vs. intermediate range 5 (29.4%) HR, 0.32 (95%) CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.034]. CONCLUSION: This pilot analysis showed that lowering UFH-targets in left-Impella™ supported CS patients seems to be a safe and promising strategy for reducing major bleedings without increasing MACCE. This needs to be validated in larger, randomized clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Heparin , Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Retrospective Studies
8.
Eur Heart J Suppl ; 25(Suppl I): I24-I31, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093766

ABSTRACT

Monitoring of the patient supported with a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is crucial in achieving the best possible outcome. Monitoring is a continuous and labour-intensive process, as cardiogenic shock (CS) patients can rapidly deteriorate and may require new interventions within a short time period. Echocardiography and invasive haemodynamic monitoring form the cornerstone of successful tMCS support. During monitoring, it is particularly important to ensure that adequate end-organ perfusion is achieved and maintained. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of best practices for monitoring the CS patient supported by a micro-axial flow pump, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and both devices simultaneously (ECMELLA approach). It is a complex process that encompasses device control, haemodynamic control and stabilization, monitoring of interventions, and assessment of end-organ function. The combined, continuous, and preferably protocol-based approach of echocardiography, evaluation of biomarkers, end-organ assessment, and haemodynamic parameters is crucial in assessing this critically ill CS patient population.

9.
Eur Heart J Suppl ; 25(Suppl I): I32-I38, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093771

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by a state of inadequate systemic tissue perfusion caused by cardiac dysfunction. When to implement, change, or remove the use of a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients with CS is dependent on the aetiology and severity. Here, patient scenarios underlying the need to escalate, de-escalate, wean, or bridge from tMCS devices are taken into consideration by interdisciplinary heart failure and CS teams. This includes a comprehensive review of and focus on the rationale for specific device escalation and de-escalation strategies, device selection, and general management.

12.
Acta Clin Belg ; 78(6): 497-508, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548503

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk for thrombotic complications. The trials investigating the optimal thromboprophylactic dose are performed in challenging times and seemingly produce conflicting evidence. The burdensome circumstances, divergent endpoints, and different analytical approaches hamper comparison and extrapolation of available evidence. Most importantly, clinicians should provide thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients while (re)assessing bleeding and thrombotic risk frequently. The COVID-19 Thromboprophylaxis Working Group of the BSTH updated its guidance document. It aims to summarize the available evidence critically and to guide clinicians in providing the best possible thromboprophylaxis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Belgium/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Thrombosis/complications , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/prevention & control
13.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 29(4): 381-391, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395328

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is emerging evidence on the role of the multimodality imaging in the setting of cardiogenic shock. The utility of different imaging modalities, along with their pitfalls and limitations, and their integration in a multiparametric approach are discussed in the current review. RECENT FINDINGS: The evaluation of congestion and perfusion in patients with shock has allowed a better understanding of the underlying physiopathological mechanisms. Integration of echocardiography, using more physiological parameters, with lung ultrasound, as well as the Doppler evaluation of abdominal blood flow dynamics, has led to a better stratification in patinas with hemodynamic instability. SUMMARY: Although validation of the integrated approaches and single parameters are needed, the physiopathological-driven approach using ultrasound in patients with cardiogenic shock on top of the clinical and biochemical evaluation, may aid to a quicker and more detailed evaluation of patient's phenotype.


Subject(s)
Shock, Cardiogenic , Shock , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnostic imaging , Hemodynamics/physiology , Echocardiography
15.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(14): 1707-1720, 2023 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37495347

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) are increasingly being used because of improved experience and availability. The Impella (Abiomed), a percutaneous microaxial, continuous-flow, short-term ventricular assist device, requires meticulous postimplantation management to avoid the 2 most frequent complications, namely, bleeding and hemolysis. A standardized approach to the prevention, detection, and treatment of these complications is mandatory to improve outcomes. The risk for hemolysis is mostly influenced by pump instability, resulting from patient- or device-related factors. Upfront echocardiographic assessment, frequent monitoring, and prompt intervention are essential. The precarious hemostatic balance during pVAD support results from the combination of a procoagulant state, due to critical illness and contact pathway activation, together with a variety of factors aggravating bleeding risk. Preventive strategies and appropriate management, adapted to the impact of the bleeding, are crucial. This review offers a guide to physicians to tackle these device-related complications in this critically ill pVAD-supported patient population.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Hemolysis , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Shock, Cardiogenic
16.
Drugs Aging ; 40(8): 691-702, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37452262

ABSTRACT

Heart failure is a prevalent syndrome among older adults, with a major impact on morbidity and mortality. Higher age is correlated with underuse of guideline-directed medical therapies which, in turn, has been linked to worse clinical outcomes. Importantly, most evidence so far has been collected in adults who were younger, less multi-morbid and polymedicated compared with those who are commonly treated in daily clinical practice. Hence, we aimed to assess and describe the evidence base for pharmacotherapy in older adults with heart failure with a reduced ejection. First, a narrative review was undertaken using Medline, from inception to January 2023. Four foundational therapies were selected based on the latest European Society of Cardiology clinical practice guideline: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Post hoc analyses from landmark heart failure drug trials were searched and included if they contained data on the impact of age on efficacy, safety and/or timeliness of therapies in the management of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Second, a proposal was developed to support and promote the use of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy in complex, older adults. In total, 11 articles were selected: 4 meta-analyses, 6 post hoc analyses and 1 review paper. No attenuation of efficacy for any of the foundational agents was found in older adults. Regarding safety, dedicated analyses showed that beta blockers, mineraloid receptor antagonists, sacubitril-valsartan, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin retained their overall benefit-risk profile regardless of age. Time to benefit was short and occurred generally within 1 month. Consensus was achieved on a five-step proposal to manage complex medication regimens in older adults suffering from heart failure. In conclusion, older adults suffering from heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction should not be denied treatment based on their age.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Aged , Humans , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Stroke Volume , Tetrazoles/pharmacology , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
17.
Nat Rev Cardiol ; 20(12): 830-844, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474795

ABSTRACT

Conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention comprises aspirin with a potent P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12) inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) for 12 months. Although this approach reduces ischaemic risk, patients are exposed to a substantial risk of bleeding. Strategies to reduce bleeding include de-escalation of DAPT intensity (downgrading from potent P2Y12 inhibitor at conventional doses to either clopidogrel or reduced-dose prasugrel) or abbreviation of DAPT duration. Either strategy requires assessment of the ischaemic and bleeding risks of each individual. De-escalation of DAPT intensity can reduce bleeding without increasing ischaemic events and can be guided by platelet function testing or genotyping. Abbreviation of DAPT duration after 1-6 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor, reduces bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients at high bleeding risk, particularly those without high ischaemic risk. However, these two strategies have not yet been compared in a head-to-head clinical trial. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the evidence base for these treatment approaches, provide guidance on the assessment of ischaemic and bleeding risks, and provide consensus statements from an international panel of experts to help clinicians to optimize these DAPT approaches for individual patients to improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Coronary Thrombosis , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/etiology , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
18.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 29(4): 392-396, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37306541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a very challenging condition with high mortality, despite the advances in therapeutic options. Haematological complications, including coagulopathy and haemolysis, frequently arise in these critically ill patients in CS, especially if they need percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS), and impair the outcome. This stresses the urgent need for further advancement of this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we discuss the different haematological challenges during CS and additional pMCS. Furthermore, we propose a management strategy aiming for restabilization of this precarious haemostatic balance. SUMMARY: In this review, pathophysiology and management of coagulopathies during CS and pMCS are discussed, as well as the need for further studies in this field.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Shock, Cardiogenic , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
20.
Int J Cardiol ; 383: 75-81, 2023 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37149006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute infections cause relevant activation of innate immunity and inflammatory cascade. An excessive response against pathogens has been proved to trigger the pathophysiological process of thrombo-inflammation. Nevertheless, an association between the use of antithrombotic agents and the outcome of critically ill patients with infectious diseases is lacking. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the impact of antithrombotic treatment on survival of patients with acute infective disease. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any antithrombotic agent in patients with infectious diseases other than COVID-19. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Summary estimates for mortality were calculated using the inverse-variance random-effects method. RESULTS: A total of 16,588 patients participating in 18 RCTs were included, of whom 2141 died. Four trials evaluated therapeutic-dose anticoagulation, 1 trial prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, 4 trials aspirin, and 9 trials other antithrombotic agents. Overall, the use of antithrombotic agents was not associated with all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: The use of antithrombotics is not associated with all-cause mortality in patients with infectious disease other than COVID-19. Complex pathophysiological interplays between inflammatory and thrombotic pathways may explain these results and need further investigation. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021241182.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fibrinolytic Agents , Humans , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Aspirin , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...