Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing backward walking to forward walking training on balance in multiple sclerosis: The TRAIN-MS trial.

Balance impairment and accidental falls are a pervasive challenge faced by persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), significantly impacting their quality of life. While exercise has proven to be an effective intervention for improving mobility and functioning in PwMS, current exercise approaches predominantly emphasize forward walking (FW) and balance training, with variable improvements in balance and fall rates. Backward walking (BW) has emerged as a promising intervention modality for enhancing mobility and strength outcomes; however, significant gaps remain. Specifically, there is limited knowledge about the efficacy of BW interventions on outcomes such as static, anticipatory, and reactive balance, balance confidence, falls, and cognition. This randomized controlled trial aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of 8-weeks of backward walking training (TRAIN-BW) as compared to forward walking training (TRAIN-FW). Ninety individuals with MS with self-reported walking dysfunction or ≥ 2 falls in the past 6 months will be randomized in blocks, stratified by sex and disease severity to either the TRAIN-BW or TRAIN-FW intervention groups. Adherence and retention rates will be used to determine feasibility and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire will be used to assess acceptability. The primary outcomes will be static, anticipatory, and reactive balance. Secondary outcomes include walking velocity, balance confidence, concern about falling, cognition, physical activity, and fall rates measured prospectively for 6 months after post-testing. Additionally, the extent to which cognitive functioning influences response to intervention will be examined. Backward walking training may be an innovative intervention to address balance impairments and falls in persons with MS.

Home-Based Balance Training on Balance and Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) examine the effects of home-based balance training on balance and mobility outcomes; (2) evaluate comparable effects between home- and center-based balance training; (3) determine the effects of different levels of supervision on treatment effects; and (4) investigate dose-response relationships of home-based balance training on balance and mobility performance in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, SPORTSDiscus, and CINAHL in April 2023. Other literature sources included website and citation searches. STUDY SELECTION: The study included randomized controlled trials of home-based balance training that included balance and mobility outcomes in persons with MS. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted from each study included (1) number of participants; (2) dropout rate; (3) sex; (4) MS phenotype; (5) age; (6) Expanded Disability Status Scale (range); (7) exercise dose; (8) level of supervision; (9) type of intervention; (10) exercise progression; (11) type of control; and (12) outcomes measures. For the meta-analysis, mean and SD of the balance and mobility outcomes in both the intervention and control groups were used. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated by Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies were identified in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Each balance and mobility outcome was standardized using Hedges' g. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed comparable results between home- and center-based balance training in terms of balance and mobility improvement. There was also no evidence for the superiority of home-based balance training over no training except for static steady-state balance. This study revealed that training sessions (>36 sessions) and total exercise time (>1100min) were significant moderators for overall balance improvements. Results also indicated that, when designing future interventions, at least an indirect level of supervision (eg, weekly or biweekly phone/video calls) is warranted to maintain adherence.

Information processing speed and disease severity predict real-world ambulation in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Impairments in real-world gait quality and quantity are multifaceted for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), encompassing mobility, cognition, and fear of falling. However, these factors are often examined independently, limiting insights into the combined contributions they make to real-world ambulation. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do mobility, cognition, and fear of falling contribute to real-world gait quality and quantity in individuals with MS? METHODS: Twenty individuals with MS underwent a series of cognitive assessments, including the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Symbol Digits Modalities Test (SDMT), Stroop Test, and the Selective Reminding Test (SRT). Participants also completed the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I) and walking impairment using the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Following the in-lab session, participants wore an inertial sensor on their lower back and asked to go about their typical daily routines for three days. Metrics of gait speed, stride regularity, time spent walking, and total bouts were extracted from the real-world data. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between both real-world gait speed and stride regularity and the SDMT, FES-I, and PDDS. Backward linear regression analysis was conducted for gait speed and stride regularity, with PDDS and SDMT included in the final model for both metrics. These variables explained 63% of the variance in gait speed and 69% of the variance in stride regularity. Results were not significant for gait quantity after adjusting for age and sex. SIGNIFICANCE: The study's results provide insight regarding the roles of cognition, walking impairment, and fear of falling on real-world ambulation. Deeper understanding of these contributions can inform the development of targeted interventions that aim to improve walking. Additionally, the absence of significant correlations between gait metrics, cognition, and fear of falling with gait quantity underscores the need for further research to identify factors that increased walking in this population.

Backwards walking speed reserve in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Decreased gait speed is common in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and has been associated with elevated fall risk. The walking speed reserve (WSR) indicates the ability to increase gait speed on demand and has previously been examined in PwMS. Backward walking is a sensitive measure of fall risk in PwMS; however, no studies have reported on the utility of backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) as a clinical assessment tool of functional mobility or fall risk in PwMS, nor have they associated this measure with cognition. METHODS: 23 PwMS completed walking trials at their preferred walking speed (PWS) and maximal walking speed (MWS). Participants performed these walking trials in both the forward (FW) and backward direction (BW). The forward walking speed reserve (FW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the forward direction, while the backward walking speed reserve (BW-WSR) was calculated as the difference between MWS and PWS in the back backward direction. Correlation analyses examined the relationship between the FW- and BW-WSR with clinical assessments of functional mobility (the timed up-and-go) as well as cognitive functioning (the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the California Verbal Learning Test, and the Trail Making Test A and B). Correlations also examined the relationship between FW- and BW-WSR with prospective falls. RESULTS: A lower BW-WSR was associated with disease severity and poorer performance on clinical walking and balance assessment, as well as with decreased information processing speed and attentional performance. Interestingly, FW-WSR showed similar relations. Neither FW- or BW-WSR were associated with prospective risk in this small sample of PwMS. CONCLUSION: The BW-WSR did not offer a distinct advantage over other measures, such as the FW-WSR, PWS, or MWS, in the forward or backward direction. The selection of the most sensitive clinical measures of functional mobility and fall risk is crucial; our study holds valuable clinical implications for PwMS by providing novel insights into functional mobility assessments in PwMS.

An Exploratory Study of Community Mobility in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis Across Different Ambulation Levels.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in community mobility in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) at various ambulation levels. METHODS: Seventy-one adults with MS completed a survey about their mobility impairment and avoidance of challenging mobility tasks. Individuals were categorized as having mild, moderate, or severe gait impairment. RESULTS: Participants across the different functional groups significantly differed in perceived ambulation disability, fatigue impact, falls efficacy, quality of life, challenges with dual-tasking, and self-efficacy for community mobility. There were no significant differences between the mild and moderate gait impairment groups in crossing a busy street or going out in different ambient conditions. Significant differences were found between those with mild impairment and those with severe impairment in avoidance of various terrain elements, heavy manual doors, postural transitions, attentional situations, and crowded places. The only environmental dimension that significantly differed across all 3 groups was carrying 2 or more items, in which avoidance increased as ambulation worsened. CONCLUSIONS: Avoidance behavior for particular environmental features can begin relatively early in the disease process. This underscores the need to further study mobility differences, community ambulation, and participation restrictions in adults with MS.

Mobility and Dual Tasking in the Everyday Lives of Adults with Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Exploration.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to understand how people with multiple sclerosis experience dual-tasking situations in their everyday lives. METHODS: Focus groups involving a total of 11 individuals with multiple sclerosis (eight females and three males) participated in this qualitative inquiry. Participants were asked open-ended questions focused on the nature of and consequences around dual tasking when standing or walking. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to examine the data. RESULTS: Three themes were generated from the data: (a) Life Is a Dual Task, (b) The Social Divide, and (c) Sacrifices for Stability. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significance and impact of dual tasking on the lived experience of adults with multiple sclerosis, furthering the need to more fully examine this phenomenon and potentially improve fall-prevention interventions and facilitate community participation.

Predicting falls in adults with multiple sclerosis using patient-reported measures: Are perceptions of dual-tasking missing?

BACKGROUND: Mobility challenges and cognitive impairments prominent in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) significantly increase the risk of falling. Examining perceptions of how the simultaneous performance of completing motor and cognitive tasks impacts fall risk may have clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to identify the most significant self-reported predictors of falling including perceived dual-tasking. METHODS: Participants included 79 individuals with MS were surveyed and reported their fall history over the previous 3 months and completed the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale -12 (MSWS-12), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), and two Dual-Task Questionnaires (DTQ), a previously published original one and a newly expanded version. RESULTS: Of the sample, 63 were classified as non-fallers and 16 as fallers. Backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that perceived ambulation disability and dual-tasking best predicted fall status (sensitivity of 57.7%, specificity of 90.6%, area under the receiving operating curve of 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.92). CONCLUSION: The inclusion of self-reported dual-tasking perceptions has utility in predicting fall risk. Effective assessment toward this end offers the potential for early detection and intervention.

Cognitive-Motor Interference and Cortical Activation While Walking in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.

The present study expands on current understanding of dual-task cognitive-motor interference, by including cortical activation measures to both traditional and ecologically valid dual-task paradigms. Fifteen individuals with multiple sclerosis and 14 control participants underwent mobility testing while wearing functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In the absence of increased prefrontal cortical activation, subjects with multiple sclerosis performed significantly worse on measures of cognition under both single- and dual-task conditions. These findings suggest that persons with multiple sclerosis may be unable to allocate additional cortical resources to cognition under dual-task conditions, leading to significant cognitive-motor interference and decrements in performance. This study is the first to investigate cortical activation across several commonly used and ecologically valid dual-task assessments.

Development and initial validation of a digital divided-attention neurocognitive test for use in concussion assessment.

Objective: Computerized neurocognitive tests are commonly used after a concussion injury. The use of reliable and valid tests that utilize a divided-attention task may improve assessment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test a digital divided-attention neurocognitive test for test-retest reliability, practise effects, and initial validity. Methods and procedures: One hundred ninety-two subjects (159 healthy, 33 concussed) were assessed utilizing the neurocognitive test. Group comparisons were made between subjects with concussions and matched controls to determine the initial sensitivity of the test. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients remained high (greater than 0.50) across all time points tested, and practise effects were largest in first retest session but we correlated (single task: R2 = 0.89, divided-attention: R2 = 0.85). Subjects who had experienced concussions performed significantly worse than matched controls on both the maths computation task and shape matching task during the divided-attention test. Conclusion: The mathematical computation component of the divided-attention test yielded high reliability. Practise effects were seen between the first and second testing sessions with smaller, insignificant improvements seen thereafter. Sensitivity to injury was comparable to other digital neurocognitive tests suggesting ongoing testing is warranted.