ABSTRACT
Importance: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) shows promise as a first-line genetic test for acutely ill infants, but widespread adoption and implementation requires evidence of an effect on clinical management. Objective: To determine the effect of WGS on clinical management in a racially and ethnically diverse and geographically distributed population of acutely ill infants in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, time-delayed clinical trial enrolled participants from September 11, 2017, to April 30, 2019, with an observation period extending to July 2, 2019. The study was conducted at 5 US academic medical centers and affiliated children's hospitals. Participants included infants aged between 0 and 120 days who were admitted to an intensive care unit with a suspected genetic disease. Data were analyzed from January 14 to August 20, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive clinical WGS results 15 days (early) or 60 days (delayed) after enrollment, with the observation period extending to 90 days. Usual care was continued throughout the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the difference in the proportion of infants in the early and delayed groups who received a change of management (COM) 60 days after enrollment. Additional outcome measures included WGS diagnostic efficacy, within-group COM at 90 days, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Results: A total of 354 infants were randomized to the early (n = 176) or delayed (n = 178) arms. The mean participant age was 15 days (IQR, 7-32 days); 201 participants (56.8%) were boys; 19 (5.4%) were Asian; 47 (13.3%) were Black; 250 (70.6%) were White; and 38 (10.7%) were of other race. At 60 days, twice as many infants in the early group vs the delayed group received a COM (34 of 161 [21.1%; 95% CI, 15.1%-28.2%] vs 17 of 165 [10.3%; 95% CI, 6.1%-16.0%]; P = .009; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.22-4.32) and a molecular diagnosis (55 of 176 [31.0%; 95% CI, 24.5%-38.7%] vs 27 of 178 [15.0%; 95% CI, 10.2%-21.3%]; P < .001). At 90 days, the delayed group showed a doubling of COM (to 45 of 161 [28.0%; 95% CI, 21.2%-35.6%]) and diagnostic efficacy (to 56 of 178 [31.0%; 95% CI, 24.7%-38.8%]). The most frequent COMs across the observation window were subspecialty referrals (39 of 354; 11%), surgery or other invasive procedures (17 of 354; 4%), condition-specific medications (9 of 354; 2%), or other supportive alterations in medication (12 of 354; 3%). No differences in length of stay or survival were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, for acutely ill infants in an intensive care unit, introduction of WGS was associated with a significant increase in focused clinical management compared with usual care. Access to first-line WGS may reduce health care disparities by enabling diagnostic equity. These data support WGS adoption and implementation in this population. Trail Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03290469.
Subject(s)
Acute Disease , Genetic Diseases, Inborn , Whole Genome Sequencing , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate once-weekly liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) for Candida prophylaxis in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled study included neonates who were <32 weeks' gestational age, <7 days old, and weighing <1500 g at birth. Subjects were randomized to receive L-AmB 5 mg/kg per week or placebo (dextrose water) and were followed until 6 weeks of age. Surveillance cultures were obtained at baseline, at 72 hours, and weekly thereafter. Study drug was continued until 6 weeks after birth or the discontinuation of high-risk treatments and invasive devices, whichever occurred first. Blood cultures were obtained as clinically indicated. The primary end point was development of Candida colonization by 6 weeks' postnatal age; secondary end points included development of invasive candidiasis and occurrence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety variables included renal and hepatic function tests, incidence of grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and mortality. RESULTS: Forty subjects were enrolled and randomized to receive L-AmB (12 males, 8 females; 50% white) or placebo (12 males, 8 females; 35% white). Subjects were evenly distributed by gestational age, age at enrollment, birth weight, race, and sex. Consent was withdrawn after completion of study treatment in 1 subject (L-AmB); 1 subject in each study arm died during the study; and 3 subjects were transferred back to their referring institutions (1 L-AmB, 2 placebo). Thus, 17 subjects in each arm completed all study procedures, although all 40 subjects were evaluable. Colonization before administration of study drug was noted in 4 L-AmB subjects (20%) and 1 placebo subject (5%); 1 (5%) and 3 (15%) subjects in the respective groups developed colonization while receiving study drug. No L-AmB subjects and 1 placebo subject developed candidiasis. One subject in each group died; these deaths were not considered related to study drug or fungal infection. There were no clinical differences between groups in the incidence of grade III-IV IVH, NEC, hypokalemia, nephrotoxicity, need for platelet or packed red blood cell transfusion, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: L-AmB 5 mg/kg once weekly was generally well tolerated in these VLBW infants. The data did not allow evaluation of efficacy. A larger, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of L-AmB for Candida prophylaxis that is appropriately powered is warranted.
