Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Sports Med ; 39(12): 2588-94, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21946567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Snyder classification scheme is the most commonly used system for classifying superior labral injuries. Although this scheme is intended to be used for arthroscopic visual classification only, it is thought that other nonarthroscopic historical variables also influence the classification. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in classifying variable presentations of the superior labrum and to evaluate the influence of clinical variables on the classification and treatment choices of surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A group of arthroscopic shoulder surgeons were asked to rank in order of importance clinical variables considered in diagnosing and treating the superior labrum. The surgeons then watched 50 arthroscopic videos of the superior labrum, ranging from normal to pathologic, on 3 different occasions. The first and third viewings were accompanied by no clinical information. The second viewing was accompanied by a detailed clinical vignette for each video. The surgeons selected a classification and treatment for each video. RESULTS: A patient's job/sport, age, and physical examination findings were considered the most important clinical variables surgeons consider during management of the superior labrum. Comparing the 2 viewings without clinical information, surgeons selected a different classification 28.5% of the time from the first to the second time. A different classification was chosen 71.5% of the time when the surgeon was supplied a clinical vignette at the subsequent viewing. Similarly, the treatment selected changed in 36% and 69.1% of cases when viewed again without vignettes and with vignettes, respectively. Intersurgeon agreement was moderate without clinical vignettes and fair with vignettes. Historical, physical examination, and surgical observations were found to influence the odds of change of classification. CONCLUSION: There is significant intrasurgeon and intersurgeon variability in classification and treatment of the superior labrum. Clinical historical, examination, and surgical findings influence classification and treatment choices.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/classification , Shoulder Injuries , Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Humans , Observer Variation
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 27(3): 307-10, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17414015

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment is indicated for simple bone cysts (SBC) with high risk of fracture. The cyst index was described as a method to determine if a cyst is at high risk or low risk of fracture. STUDY DESIGN: The cyst index of 32 femoral and humeral SBCs was determined by 8 reviewers. The risk group cyst index was compared with whether a fracture took place. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated across varying cutoff levels. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability testing for 10 cysts was made. RESULTS: Receiver operator curves demonstrate that no cutoff value gave an acceptable level of both sensitivity and specificity. The mean value for the cyst index was significantly different for different observers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not validate the cyst index to be an accurate predictor of fracture. The test has low intraobserver and interobserver reliability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cyst index cannot reliably discriminate between the patients that will fracture and those that will not.


Subject(s)
Bone Cysts/complications , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Humeral Fractures/etiology , Child , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...