Determinants of Low Bone Turnover in Type 2 Diabetes-the Role of PTH.

Determinants of low bone turnover in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are poorly understood. To investigate the relationship between markers of bone turnover, glycaemic control, disease duration and calciotropic hormones in T2DM we assessed baseline biochemical data from the DiabOS Study, a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. In a cross-sectional study-design data from 110 postmenopausal women and men aged 50-75 years diagnosed with T2DM for at least 3 years and 92 non-diabetic controls were evaluated. Biochemical markers of bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen [PINP]), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BAP]) and resorption (C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX]), measures of calcium homeostasis (intact parathormone [iPTH], 25-Hydroxyvitamin D, calcium, magnesium) and glycaemic control were assessed. After adjustment for age, gender and body mass index (BMI), patients with T2DM had lower serum levels of PINP (p < 0.001), CTX (p < 0.001), iPTH (p = 0.03) and magnesium (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Serum calcium, creatinine, 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and sclerostin did not differ between both groups. In multivariate linear regression analyses only serum iPTH remained an independent determinant of bone turnover markers in T2DM (PINP: p = 0.02; CTX: p < 0.001 and BAP: p < 0.01), whereas glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), disease duration, age and BMI were not associated with bone turnover. In conclusion low bone turnover in T2DM is associated with low iPTH. The underlying mechanism remains to be elucidated.

Antidiabetic Treatment, Level of Glycemic Control, and Risk of Fracture in Type 2 Diabetes: a Nested, Case-Control Study.

CONTEXT: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of low-trauma fractures. However, the effect of antidiabetic medication in relation to glycemic control on the risk of fracture is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate the association between the level of glycemic control, use of antidiabetic medication, and risk of low-trauma fractures in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control analysis among individuals registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The base population consisted of patients with newly diagnosed T2DM from 1995 to 2017. Cases were patients with a low-trauma fracture after T2DM diagnosis. We matched 4 controls to each case. Exposures of interest were glycemic control (last glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] level before fracture) and type of diabetes treatment. We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses adjusted for several confounders. RESULTS: We identified 8809 cases and 35 219 controls. Patients with current metformin use and HbA1c levels of less than 7.0% and between 7.0-8.0% had a reduced risk of fractures (adjusted odds ratio 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96 and 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90, respectively) compared with untreated patients. However, in patients receiving metformin plus 1 or 2 other antidiabetic drugs, or insulin (alone or in addition to other antidiabetic medication), the level of glycemic control was not associated with the risk of fracture compared with untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: While patients with good or medium glycemic control receiving current metformin monotherapy had a lower risk of fracture compared with untreated patients, glycemic control in patients receiving treatment other than metformin was not associated with risk of fracture.

Association Between Glycemic Control and Risk of Fracture in Diabetic Patients: A Nested Case-Control Study.

CONTEXT: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increased risk of fractures. However, the effect of glycemic control on the risk of fracture is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between glycemic control and the risk of low-trauma fractures in patients with type 1 DM (T1DM) and type 2 DM (T2DM). DESIGN: Nested case-control analysis. SETTING: UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The study population was patients whose T1DM or T2DM had been newly diagnosed between 1995 and 2015. The cases were patients with a low-trauma fracture after DM onset. We matched four controls to each case by age, sex, general practice, fracture date, and DM type and duration. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for covariates, including body mass index, smoking, DM complications and medications. RESULTS: The study population included 3329 patients with T1DM and 44,275 patients with T2DM. The median duration between DM onset and fracture date was 4.5 years for both T1DM and T2DM. The risk of fracture was increased in the patients with T1DM with a mean hemoglobin A1c >8.0% (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.83) compared with those patients with T1DM and a mean hemoglobin A1c ≤7.0%. No such effect was found in the patients with T2DM. Independently of glycemic control, the risk of fracture was elevated in patients with T2DM and the current use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of glycemic control on the risk of low-trauma fracture differs between patients with T1DM and T2DM. Poor glycemic control increased the risk of fractures in patients with T1DM but not in those with T2DM.