Hyperammonemic encephalopathy after tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A literature review and a case example.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of uncommon but fatal adverse event of hyperammonemic encephalopathy by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and the possible mechanisms underlying this condition and to describe the case of a patient that developed drug-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy related to TKI. DATA SOURCES: Literature search of different databases was performed for studies published from 1 January 1992 to 7 May 2023. The search terms utilized were hyperammonemic encephalopathy, TKI, apatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, imatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, trametinib, urea cycle regulation, sorafenib, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 1, ornithine transcarbamylase, argininosuccinate synthetase, argininosuccinate lyase, arginase 1, Mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway and mTOR pathway, were used individually search or combined. DATA SUMMARY: Thirty-seven articles were included. The articles primarily focused in hyperammonemic encephalopathy case reports, management of hyperammonemic encephalopathy, urea cycle regulation, autophagy, mTOR and MAPK pathways, and TKI. CONCLUSION: Eighteen cases of hyperammonemic encephalopathy were reported in the literature from various multitargeted TKI. The mechanism of this event is not well-understood but some authors have hypothesized vascular causes since some of TKI are antiangiogenic, however our literature review shows a possible relationship between the urea cycle and the molecular inhibition exerted by TKI. More preclinical evidence is required to unveil the biochemical mechanisms responsible involved in this process and clinical studies are necessary to shed light on the prevalence, risk factors, management and prevention of this adverse event. It is important to monitor neurological symptoms and to measure ammonia levels when manifestations are detected.

Selection of neoadjuvant treatment based on the 21-GENE test results in luminal breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an optimal option in early breast cancer, but in ER-positive/HER2-negative (luminal) is still controversial, although a survival benefit has recently been observed when a histological response by Symmans' method type 0 or I is achieved. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay (Oncotype DX®) is a validated test to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients but its role in the neoadjuvant setting is less established. We analyzed the results of the Oncotype DX® test in a cohort of 122 consecutive patients selected to receive NAC based on classical clinicopathological parameters and the correlation between the Oncotype DX® results and the pathological response assessed by Symmans' method. Median age was 56.5 (range 31-84) years. Initial tumor size was T1 (<20 mm) in 46 patients (37.7%), 57 (46.7%) had a T2 tumor (20-50 mm), and 19 (15.6%) had a tumor size more than 50 mm. 59 (48.4%) had axillary node involvement. The median expression estrogen and progesteron receptors by immunohistochemistry was 280 and 120 respectively and median Ki67 index was 28%. The Recurrence Score (RS) results were <11 in 21 patients (17.2%) patients, RS 11 to 25 in 58 (47.5%), and RS > 25 in 43 (35.2%). Considering the Oncotype DX test results, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 60 patients (49%), 11 (9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 51 (42%) no chemotherapy. Testing with the assay has therefore led to 42% fewer chemotherapy treatments. Among 60 patients receiving NAC, pathologic response was achieved for 5 patients (8.3%) with RCB-0 and 15 RCB-1 (25%). We did not find any pathological response RCB-0 and RCB-I in the 20 patients who received NAC and had a Recurrence Score result <21 for the premenopausal group, or a RS result <25 for the postmenopausal group. For patients with highest Recurrence Score results (RS > 21 or 25 according to menopausal status) it was 12% (5/40) RCB-0 and 40% (16/40) RCB-I. CONCLUSIONS: The Oncotype DX test could be a useful tool to select patients candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be avoided in 42% of patients. We found a correlation between Recurrence Score results and pathological response with 14% of RCB-0 and a total of 47% of significant pathological response type RCB-0 and RCB-I in patients with highest Recurrence Score results. Interestingly, patients with a Recurrence Score result inferior to 32 did not get any histological response type 0 and only 5% RCB-I.