[Experience in surgical management of rectal prolapse in two hospitals in Mexico City]. / Experiencia del tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal en dos hospitales de tercer nivel en la ciudad de México.

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse is defined as a falling out of place of the rectum through anus. Surgery is the treatment of choice to reverse abnormal anatomy and to improve anorectal function. OBJECTIVE: To review the experience in recent years of surgical management of rectal prolapse in the Hospital Central Militar and Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubiran. METHODS: All patients with rectal prolapse who underwent surgical treatment between January 1993 through December 2008 at two institutions in Mexico City were included. Clinical information was obtained of the clinical files in both hospitals. Main study variables were age, sex, degree of prolapse, morbility and type of surgery performed. RESULTS: Fifty seven patients were included, predominantly female (59.6%) with a mean age of 45 years. The most frequent diagnosis was complete rectal prolapse. Fifteen patients (26%) were treated by perineal procedure and 42 (74%) through abdomen: 17 (40%) open and 25 (60%) laparoscopic. Morbidity rate was lower in the laparoscopic group with less length of hospital stay and a lower blood loss, but with higher recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although the laparoscopic surgery showed advantage related with a less morbility, blood loss and hospital stay, it showed higher recurrence rates."

[Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: third level center experience.]. / Cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica:experiencia en un centro de tercer nivel.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of colorectal pathologies is steal unclear. Some new evidence has shown some advantages over open procedures. Because it is a technically demanding procedure, the progress is very low, and used among few colorectal surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a third level referral center, in a fourth year period. We analyzed short and median outcomes, for benign and malignant diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all colorectal laparoscopic procedures was analyzed in a period between June 2003 and July 2007. Procedures for benign and malignant diseases were included. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy cases were included, 52 (30%) for malignant and 118 (70%)for benign diseases. The main indication for surgery was diverticular disease followed by colorectal cancer and the most common procedure was sigmoidectomy followed by right colectomy. Conversion rate was 8.8% (15 patients) and overall morbidity and mortality were 12%, and less than 1% respectively.Oncologic results were evaluated with a median follow up of 2 years, for a loco regional recurrence rate of 6%. Mean number of nodes retrieved in the pathologic specimen were 15.69 (+/- 3.53). All malignant cases had negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal procedures are safe and feasible, in large volume centers showing equivalent results when comparing with open procedures evidenced in world literature,about results of oncologic cases, due to the short follow up period we can t conclude about oncologic outcomes.