Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Ig ; 36(4): 421-431, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525974

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Vaccinations represent an extremely effective tool for the prevention of certain infectious diseases - such as influenza and COVID-19 -, particularly for those categories at risk due to both their frail condition or professional exposure, such as healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to describe the course of the anti-influenza and anti-COVID-19 vaccination campaign at two Research Hospitals in Milan, Italy. Study design: Multicentre, cross-sectional study. Methods: For the 2023-24 vaccination campaign, the two facilities opted for two different approaches. At the Hospital A, two dif-ferent strategies for vaccinating healthcare workers were implemented: a fixed-site vaccination clinic and two mobile vaccination groups run by Public Health residents of the University of Milan. At the Hospital B, on the other hand, a single fixed-site outpatient clinic run by Public Health residents of the University of Milan was used. On the occasion of the campaign, a survey was also carried out using anonymous online questionnaires to investigate healthcare workers attitudes towards vaccination. Results: A total of 1,937 healthcare workers were vaccinated: 756 were immunized against influenza only, 99 against COVID-19 only, and 1,082 against both. The results show a substantial difference in vaccination adherence among medical and nursing staff compared to other professional categories. In particular, the category with the highest vaccination adhesion turned out to be that of medical doctors with 55.7% adhesion while, on the contrary, the category with the lowest adhesion turned out to be that of auxiliary personnel characterized by 7.4% adhesion. At the same time, the comparison between the two hospital facilities showed a double adherence rate by the staff of Hospital A as regards both the flu vaccine (40.6% and 20.1%) and the anti-COVID-19 vaccine (26.4% and 12.3%). Finally, the survey showed that the attitude towards influenza vaccination is lower among auxiliary staff in terms of both knowledge and vaccination attitude. Conclusions: The results of the study show a vaccination adherence in line with that of previous years, although lower than the values recommended by the principal national and international Organizations. The analysis of the differences between the two facilities and the surveys carried out will allow for the implementation of targeted interventions to increase adherence in future campaigns.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hospitals, Teaching , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Humans , Italy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel
2.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 21(10): 1459-1468, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33108970

ABSTRACT

AbstractCOVID-19 pandemic led many countries to implement lockdown measures. Italy declared lockdown from 9th March to 3rd May 2020, and universities shifted to online classes. Home confinement could prevent students from achieving the physical activity and sleep levels recommended for their psychophysical health, and medicine students are already known to be at risk of inactivity and reduced sleep due to their time-consuming curricula. This study aimed at describing medicine students' behaviours during lockdown and comparing them with pre-lockdown data and current recommendations. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among 6th-year Italian medicine students (n = 714; age=25 ± 2 y; female: 62%; male: 38%) in October-November 2019. The same survey was repeated in 6th-year students during lockdown (n = 394; age=25 ± 2 y; female: 73%; male: 27%), and extended to 1st-5th year (total 1st-6th-year sample during lockdown: n = 1471; age=23 ± 2 y; female: 70%; male: 30%). International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ) and selected questions from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were administered to evaluate physical activity, sitting and sleep time. Decreased physical activity, and increased sitting and sleep time were observed from pre- to during lockdown in 6th-year students (p<0.01). 1st-6th-year students featured 10 [8-12] hours sitting (median [Q1-Q3]) and an IPAQ score of 1170 [400-2348] MET-min/week. Even participants with higher physical activity featured high sitting time. Sleeping less than recommended (<7 h/night) was associated with more sitting time and less energies to perform daily activities. Strategies fostering compliance with current guidelines for physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep should be implemented, especially in case of a repeated or intermittent lockdown.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Quarantine , Sedentary Behavior , Sleep , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Energy Metabolism , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Walking , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...