A prospective randomized control trial comparing outcomes of casting, pinning, and plating for distal end of radius fractures (AO type A2, A3, C1, or C2) in the elderly population.

PURPOSE: With this prospective randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to provide the outcome analyses of the three most used treatment modalities for distal end of radius (DER) fracture management in the elderly. METHODS: A prospective randomized control trial was performed. Fifty-two patients with DER fractures (AO A2, A3, C1, or C2) were randomized to the casting (n = 17), percutaneous pinning (n = 18), and the volar plating group (n = 17). Radiological measurements measured were radial inclination (RI), radial height (RH), volar tilt (VT), and ulnar variance (UV). The outcome was measured based on range-of-motion, grip strength, Patient-Related-Wrist-Evaluation (PRWE) score, and the Quick-Disabilities-of-the-Arm-Shoulder-Hand (QDASH) score. RESULTS: Immediate post-operative and 1-year-follow-up X-rays showed a significant difference measurement between the groups (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of the casting and pinning groups (p < 0.05) and the casting and plating groups (p < 0.05) revealed significant differences at the 1-year follow-up, but not the pinning and plating groups (p > 0.05). The analysis found significant differences in clinical outcomes after 1 month of follow-up, with the plating group outperforming the other two (p > 0.05). However, after a year of follow-up, all groups had comparable outcomes; however, the plating group showed improved palmar flexion (p < 0.001), radial deviation (p < 0.001), and a lower PRWE score (p < 0.05), indicating better wrist function. Complications were more in casting group. CONCLUSION: The study found a radiologically significant difference between groups throughout the follow-up, but it did not affect functional results. Clinical outcomes were similar across the groups, with plating showing better palmar flexion and radial deviation. Grip strength was also better in the plating group, but statistically insignificant. The study suggests plating should be chosen over other treatments for high-demand patients.

Subtrochanteric femur nonunion - Chasing the elusive an analysis of two techniques to achieve union: Nail-plate fixation and plate-structural fibula graft fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The subtrochanteric region is known for its unique biomechanical properties that contribute to challenges in fracture reduction. To ensure optimal fracture healing, achieving robust mechanical stability is essential. There are very few studies in the literature describing the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture nonunion. PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes of two techniques of revision fixation of nonunion in subtrochanteric femur fracture, namely, nail-plate fixation and plate-structural fibula graft fixation. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of subtrochanteric femur nonunion between January 2011 and December 2019. The demographic details, details of the index surgery, details of the revision surgery and the time to final union were collected. The nonunion was divided based on the level of the fracture into high subtrochanteric and low subtrochanteric. Two revision techniques were used: plate-structural fibula graft for high subtrochanteric and nail-plate construct for low subtrochanteric femur fractures RESULTS: Out of the 54 patients that were included, there was malalignment in 53.70 %, medial comminution in 46.3 %, distraction at the fracture site in 44.4 %, lateral trochanteric wall break in 37.03 % and implant failure in 70.37 % of the patients. There were 20 high subtrochanteric and 34 low subtrochanteric fractures. Union was achieved in 53 patients (98.14 %). The mean LEFS score was 71.4 in the nail-plate group and 66.2 in the plate-structural fibula graft group (p 0.003). CONCLUSION: The treatment of subtrochanteric femur fracture nonunion can be a daunting task. The goal is to correct the varus and restore the medial support which will prevent the occurrence of collapse and another failure. We were able to achieve this with both the nail-plate and the plate- structural fibula graft revision methods.

Can locking plate fixation and free Vascularised fibular transfer with skin island achieve good functional outcome in the treatment of large bone defects of Tibia ? A study of 26 cases.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, management of tibial bone loss continues to be a challenge. Free vascularized fibula graft (FVFG) with a skin paddle offers better advantages over the other methods. We aimed to study the functional outcomes and QALY of patients with large tibial bone defects following FVFG with a locking plate in 26 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 26 consecutive patients with large tibial bone defects treated by free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) and stabilization using a long locking plate between 2009 and 2018. All were followed up for a mean period of 42 months (24 months to 120 months). Bony union, graft hypertrophy, and complications such as stress fracture and infections were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify any association between demographic factors, injury characteristics, treatment-related factors, and fibular hypertrophy. Additionally, The EQ-5D quality-of-life (QOL) indices were obtained using the SF-12 score to evaluate the patients' overall quality of life. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of presentation was 36.26 yrs (range, 18-60 years). The cause of bone loss was open injury in 16 patients and infected nonunion in 10 patients. Complete union was achieved in 25 patients (96 %) without any requirement of additional surgical procedures. The mean union time of the graft was 4.04 months (range, 3-6 months). The mean fibular hypertrophy calculated by De Boer index was 0.61 %, 11 %, 28.24 % and 52.52 % at 3,6 months and 1 and 2 years respectively. Patients with metaphyseal bone loss have significant fibular hypertrophy. Participants in our study experienced a quality of life equivalent to 0.88 (range 0.79-0.99) of perfect health. CONCLUSIONS: FVFG with skin paddle and LCP fixation for massive tibial bone loss achieved satisfactory outcome and QALY even in the challenging healthcare environment of South India, a developing country.It maintains alignment, promotes graft hypertrophy, and prevents stress fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 LEVEL OF CLINICAL CARE: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

Management of open fractures: A narrative review.

Open fractures are an emergency where the principal aim of the treatment is to maximise the restoration of limb function while preventing the dreaded consequences of infection and non-union. The decision-making process for open injuries is influenced by a variety of criteria, such as patient age, injury features, systemic response, activity level, comorbidities, and functional requirements. A collaborative orthoplastic approach to treating these injuries is essential for minimizing complications and need to be considered as a single specialty in early and long-term management. It has been shown that early prophylactic systemic antibiotics, wound irrigation, aggressive debridement of contaminated and devitalized tissue, and appropriate fracture fixation decreases the complications in all grades of open fractures. The advantages of Gram-negative antibiotics, the use of local antibiotics, intraoperative wound cultures, the "fix and flap" approach, and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy are few of the treatment options that are still controversial. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive review and practice guidelines regarding the management of open fractures.

Should ulnar styloid be fixed following fixation of a distal radius fracture?

INTRODUCTION: Fracture of the base of the ulnar styloid has shown to have higher incidence of TFCC tears and DRUJ instability leading to nonunion and impaired function. Poorer functional outcomes of the distal radius fracture have been attributed to the untreated associated ulnar styloid fractures while some studies have shown no difference. Thus, the treatment remains controversial. However, it has been shown that fractures at the base of the ulnar styloid have a higher incidence of tears in the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and instability in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), which can lead to nonunion and impaired function. Despite this, there are currently no studies comparing the outcomes of surgically and conservatively treated patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the outcomes of intra-articular distal radius fractures associated with base of ulnar fracture treated with distal radius LCP fixation. The study included 14 patients who were treated surgically and 49 patients who were treated conservatively, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Radiological parameters such as union and amount of displacement, VAS score for ulnar-sided wrist pain, functional assessment using the modified Mayo score and the quick DASH questionnaire and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean scores for pain (VAS), functional outcomes (modified Mayo score), disability (QuickDASH score), range of motion, and non-union rate were found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups. However, patients with non-union had statistically significant higher scores for pain (VAS), greater post-operative displacement of the styloid, poorer functional outcomes, and higher disability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference in ulnar-sided wrist pain and functional outcomes between the surgically treated and conservatively treated groups, the conservatively treated cases had a higher risk of non-union, which can negatively impact functional outcomes. The amount of pre-operative displacement was found to be a key factor in predicting non-union and can be used as a guide for determining the management of this type of fracture.

Successful Limb Salvage Using an Orthoplastic Approach of Type IIIB Open Injuries of the Shoulder: A Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: We report 3 adult men (aged 28, 34, and 71 years) with successfully salvaged mangled injuries around the shoulder with high threshold for amputation. Assessment by Mangled Extremity Severity Score, Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association-Open Fracture Classification open injury scores predicted amputation. However, extended salvage was performed by orthoplastic approach. Two of them had superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) injury. The QuickDASH score was high in 2 patients with SSSC injury and a good score in the third patient who achieved good shoulder motion. CONCLUSION: "Orthoplastic approach" achieves successful limb salvage in severely mangled shoulder injuries. Volume of muscle crush injury and double disruption of SSSC injury were the main determinants of outcome.

One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction: A Salvage Solution for the Forearm with Massive Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Salvaging the forearm is a major challenge in cases of massive bone loss from injuries in which the extremity is severely mangled or following bone resection secondary to pathological tissue excision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction as a salvage option in these difficult situations. METHODS: A total of 38 patients with forearm segmental bone loss (acute and chronic) treated between 1995 and 2014 were included (range of follow-up, 2 to 20 years). Sixteen of the patients, 8 with avulsion amputations and 8 with severely mangled extremities, were managed in the emergency department because they required immediate replantation and revascularization, respectively. In the chronic setting, bone loss was due to infection with nonunion in 16 patients, tumor of the radius in 2 patients, and pseudarthrosis of the forearm in 4 patients. The surgical technique included conversion to OBF by achieving union between the distal part of the radius and the proximal part of the ulna in the majority of cases, with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) fusion in 4 cases, and ulna to carpals in 5 cases. Direct bone contact was achieved in 16 patients, a free vascularized fibular graft was used to bridge the bone gap in 10 patients, and 12 patients required iliac crest bone-grafting. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 35.5 years (range, 6 to 87 years); there were 23 male and 15 female patients. Among those who underwent OBF for acute injuries, the mean time to union was 7.3 months; 14 patients had complete union, and 2 patients had infection with nonunion requiring secondary procedures. As assessed using the criteria of Chen, 10 patients had a grade-I functional outcome, 3 patients had a grade-II outcome, and 3 patients had a grade-III outcome. In the elective group of 22 patients, the average time to union was 7.1 months. Nonunion was reported for 2 patients. On the basis of the Peterson scoring system, the outcome was excellent for 12 patients, good for 6 patients, fair for 2 patients, and poor for 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: OBF reconstruction is a viable surgical treatment alternative. It is a demanding reconstruction but functions better and is cosmetically more appealing than a forearm amputation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.