Audit of cardiac pathology detection using a criteria-based perioperative echocardiography service.

Transthoracic echocardiography is often used to screen patients prior to non-cardiac surgery to detect conditions associated with perioperative haemodynamic compromise and to stratify risk. However, anaesthetists' use of echocardiography is quite variable. A consortium led by the American College of Cardiology Foundation has developed appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. At Joondalup Hospital in Western Australia, we have used these criteria to order echocardiographic studies in patients attending our anaesthetic pre-admission clinic. We undertook this audit to determine the incidence of significant echocardiographic findings using this approach. In a 22-month period, 606 transthoracic echocardiographic studies were performed. This represented 8.7% of clinic attendees and 1.7% of all surgical patients. In about two-thirds of the patients, the indication for echocardiography was identified on the basis of a telephone screening questionnaire. The most common indications were poor exercise tolerance (27.4%), ischaemic heart disease (20.9%) and cardiac murmurs (16.3%). Over 26% of patients studied had significant cardiac pathology (i.e. moderate or severe echocardiographic findings), most importantly moderate or severe aortic stenosis (8.6%), poor left ventricular function (7.1%), a regional wall motion abnormality (4.3%) or moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (4.1%). Using appropriate use criteria to guide ordering transthoracic echocardiography studies led to a high detection rate of clinically important cardiac pathology in our perioperative service.

Evaluation of the interpretative skills of participants of a limited transthoracic echocardiography training course (H.A.R.T.scan course).

Limited transthoracic echocardiography performed by treating physicians may facilitate assessment of haemodynamic abnormalities in perioperative and critical care patients. The interpretative skills of one hundred participants who completed an education program in limited transthoracic echocardiography were assessed by reporting five pre-recorded case studies. A high level of agreement was observed in ventricular volume assessment (left 95%, right 96%), systolic function (left 99%, right 96%), left atrial pressure (96%) and haemodynamic state (97%). The highest failure to report answers (that is, no answer given) was for right ventricular volume and function. For moderate or severe valve lesions, agreement ranged from 90 to 98%, with failure to report <5% in all cases except for mitral stenosis (18%). For mild valve lesions, the range of agreement was lower (53 to 100%) due to overestimation of severity. Medical practitioners who completed the structured educational program showed good agreement with experts in interpretation of valve and ventricular function.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and caesarean section: intraoperative use of transthoracic echocardiography.

A pregnant woman with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was monitored with transthoracic echocardiography to guide management of fluids and vasopressors during elective caesarean section. After insertion of intravenous, arterial and central venous cannulae, a transthoracic echocardiogram was performed noting left ventricular cavity size and contractility, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia, serial examinations were made intraoperatively. Short-lived haemodynamic instability ensued just before the incision and with administration of oxytocin. Her postoperative course was complicated by post-partum haemorrhage requiring radiological intervention but she ultimately recovered fully. Maintaining preload to avoid worsening of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is essential in these patients. A transthoracic echocardiogram is easily performed, of low risk and provides more useful information than a pulmonary artery catheter.

The development of a performance indicator to objectively monitor the quality of care provided by an acute pain team.

Quality assurance procedures are essential in the maintenance of clinical standards in medicine. Conventional analysis techniques have difficulty in detecting gradual changes over time. Cumulative sum techniques monitor the frequency with which an event occurs and can detect changes in its frequency as soon as they become statistically significant. This study explores the use of cumulative sum techniques to monitor the performance of an acute pain team in a teaching hospital. It shows that periods of suboptimal performance can be readily identified. The prospective use of these techniques in clinical audit may allow the earlier identification and correction of technical or organisational problems. These should lead to improvements in patient care and satisfaction.