Comprehensive review of statin-intolerance and the practical application of Bempedoic Acid.

Statin-intolerance (SI) has prevalence between 8.0 % and 10 %, and muscular complaints are the most common reason for discontinuation. Bempedoic acid (BA), an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, decreases hepatic generation of cholesterol, upregulates low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor expression in the liver, and eventually clears circulating LDL-cholesterol from the blood. Multiple randomized clinical trials studying BA demonstrate a reduction in LDL levels by 17-28 % in SI. The CLEAR OUTCOME trial established significant cardiovascular benefits with BA. A dose of 180 mg/day of BA showed promising results. BA alone or in combination with ezetimibe is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and/or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. BA reduced HbA1c by 0.12 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with diabetes. Adverse events of BA include myalgia (4.7 %), anemia (3.4 %), and increased aminotransferases (0.3 %). BA can cause up to four times higher risk of gout in those with a previous gout diagnosis or high serum uric acid levels. Reports of increased blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were noted. Current evidence does not demonstrate a reduction in deaths from cardiovascular causes. More studies that include a diverse population and patients with both high and low LDL levels should be conducted. We recommend that providers consider BA as an adjunct to statin therapy in patients with a maximally tolerated dosage to specifically target LDL levels.

Does Statin Use in Frail Patients Provide Survival Benefits? Insights From a Meta-Analysis.

Frailty is a complex syndrome that increases with age and predisposes older adults to adverse outcomes, including mortality. Statins are proven to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but there is limited data on their survival benefit in frail older people. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether statins can lower mortality in frail persons. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was conducted until September 2022 to identify studies reporting mortality outcomes with statin therapy in adults aged 75 with a validated frailty assessment. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause mortality was calculated using a random effects model. Leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. Of 5 studies (2013-2022) included (Total = 14,324, 3 prospective and 2 retrospectives, Males: 49%, Mean follow-up duration: 4.7 years), 41.6% (5971/14,324) were frail. 52.7% of patients were on a moderate-dose/no-statin, while 47.2% took a high-dose statin. Nonstatin users were older (83.35 vs 81.5) than users. Frail patients often had diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, a history of Stroke/MI, and dementia. High-dose atorvastatin was the most used statin. Pooled analysis revealed that statins lower all-cause mortality in elderly adults, however, the association was not significant (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.18; P = 0.17). The meta-analysis demonstrated that using statins to reduce mortality in frail patients does not appear justifiable. Further prospective studies are needed to guide statin use among frail older adults for survival benefits.

Prevalence of active and passive smoking among asthma and asthma-associated emergency admissions: a nationwide prevalence survey study.

Asthma affects 7% of children and 8% of adults in the United States. There is a paucity of studies examining the association between passive smoking and an increased risk of asthma exacerbations that led the authors to examine the association between various modes of smoking and rates of asthma exacerbations. A retrospective cross-sectional/case-control study was conducted using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset (2013-2018). Out of 312,979 respondents, 35,758 (11.43%) had a history of asthma, 9083 (2.9%) had asthma attacks in the past year, and 4731 (1.51%) had asthma-related emergency room admissions in the past year. Prevalence of asthma-related emergency admissions were higher among active cigarette smoking (46.25 vs 35.46%), e-cigarette smoking (26.63 vs 16.07%), and passive smoking at home (37.53 vs 25.67%), workplace passive smoking (14.35 vs 12.11%), in bar (32.38 vs 26.16%), and car (26.21 vs 14.44%) (p < 0.0001). In multivariate regression analysis, we found regular cigarette smoking (OR 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.009-1.260, p = 0.0252), e-cigarette (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.92-2.36, p = 0.0043), cigar use (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.1-1.33, p < 0.001), ultra-long cigarette length (OR 4.85, 95% CI 3.33-7.06, p < 0.0001), and passive smoking (OR 5.25, 95% CI 3.43-8.06, p < 0.0001) were associated with increased rates of asthma exacerbations over last 12 months. The study shows increased odds of asthma exacerbations among those using ultra-long cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and cigars. Consequently, passive inhalation from even a single smoker in the home, workplace, bars and cars is associated with worsening outcomes in asthma patients.

E-cigarette use and prevalence of lung diseases among the U.S. population: a NHANES survey.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological characteristics and prevalence of lung disease among e-cigarettes users in the United States. A population-based, cross-sectional survey was performed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of 2015-2018. Adults using e-cigarettes (SMQ900), traditional smoking (SMQ020: > 100 cigarettes in lifetime or SMQ040: current cigarettes use), and dual smoking (e-cigarettes and traditional smoking) were identified and compared in their sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of lung diseases (Asthma: MCQ010 and COPD: MCQ160O). We used the chi square test (categorical variables) and Mann-Whitney test and unpaired-student t test (continuous variables). p-value <0.05 was used as a reference. We excluded respondents <18 years and missing data on demographics and outcomes. Out of 178,157 respondents, 7745 (4.35%), 48,570 (27.26%), and 23,444 (13.16%) were e-cigarette smokers, traditional smokers, and dual smokers, respectively. Overall prevalence of asthma was 15.16% and COPD was 4.26%. E-cigarette smokers were younger in comparison to traditional smokers (median: 25 years vs 62 years; p < 0.0001). In females (49.34% vs 37.97%), Mexican (19.82% vs 13.35%), annual household income above $100,000 (23.97% vs 15.56%), prevalence of e-cigarette smoking was higher in comparison to traditional smoking (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of COPD was higher among dual smokers in comparison to e-cigarette and traditional smoking (10.14% vs 0.25% vs 8.11%; p < 0.0001). Prevalence of asthma was higher among dual and e-cigarette smokers in comparison with traditional smokers and non-smokers (22.44% vs 21.10% vs 14.46% vs 13.30%; p < 0.0001). Median age (Q1-Q3) was lower at which asthma (7 years (4-12) vs 25 years (8-50)) was diagnosed first among e-cigarettes smokers in comparison with traditional smokers. In a mixed effect multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found higher odds of asthma among e-cigarette users in comparison with non-smokers (Odds ratio (OR): 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.21-1.78; p = 0.0001). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) respondents were also associated with 11.28 higher odds of e-cigarette utilization (Oddsratio (OR): 11.28; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.59-22.72; p < 0.0001). We conclude the higher prevalence of e-cigarette users is seen among the younger population, female, Mexican race, and annual income above $100,000 in comparison to traditional smokers. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and asthma were both more prevalent in dual smokers. As asthma was more prevalent and diagnosed at an early age in e-cigarette smokers, more prospective studies are needed to understand the effects of e-cigarette among the population at risk to mitigate the sudden rise in utilization and to create awareness.

Seasonal variation in in-hospital outcomes of Takotsubo-syndrome-related admissions: A National Inpatient Analysis, 2019.

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a transitory stress-related cardiomyopathy characterized by acute but reversible left ventricular failure. The disease most commonly affects postmenopausal women following a traumatic experience, often presenting as an acute myocardial infarction (MI), and its prevalence is increasing globally. Cardiovascular events such as Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and stroke have well-defined seasonal variations and are most common in the winter [[8], [9], [10]]. However, there is insufficient data on the impact of such climatic variations on the etiopathogenesis and outcomes of TTS-related hospitalization in the United States.

Sex-Specific Differences in Ventricular Remodeling and Response After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

In this study, we investigated the baseline characteristics and "trajectories" of clinical response in men and women after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation. Although women enjoy improved echocardiographic response after CRT compared with men, the kinetics of this response and its relation to functional performance and outcomes are less clear. We identified 592 patients who underwent CRT implantation at our center between 2004 and 2017 and were serially followed in a multidisciplinary clinic. Longitudinal linear mixed effects regression for cardiac response was specified, including interaction terms between time after CRT and sex , and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in all-cause mortality by gender after CRT. Women in our cohort were younger than men, had less frequent ischemic etiology of heart failure (24% vs 60% in men), a shorter QRS (151 vs 161 ms) and more frequent left bundle branch block (77% vs 52%) at baseline. Women had a greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction that was evident starting at approximately 1-month after CRT. We did not observe effect modification by gender in New York Heart Association class or 6-minute walk distance after CRT. Although women had improved mortality after CRT, after adjustment for potential confounders, gender was not associated with mortality after CRT. In conclusion, women were more likely to have CRT implantation for left bundle branch block and exhibited improved echocardiographic but not functional response within the first year after CRT. Clinical outcomes after CRT were not associated with gender in adjusted analysis.