Neutral posture education during cough can reduce urine leakage in women with cough-related stress urinary incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Current literature highlights the difficulty in identifying an optimal educational technique for maintaining continence during cough. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of an educational intervention focusing on neutral posture during cough in women with cough-induced urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: This interventional study design included women with cough-induced UI. We recorded PFMs surface electromyographic (sEMG) peak activity, and assessed symptoms and quality of life (QoL) 6 weeks after the intervention. The effect of the experimental situation was estimated using a linear mixed model, sEMG measurements during coughing were indexed to each situation and adjusted to the resting value at, and a moderation analysis was used. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Eighteen participants were included. The measurement situations (control versus experimental) did not have a statistically significant impact on sEMG peak activity during coughing: mean effect [95% CI] 3.42 [-1.28; 7.66]. Six weeks post-intervention, participants reported statistically significant decrease in urinary symptoms (P=0.0246) and significant improvement in QoL (P=0.00776). This was also particularly marked on the dimension related to effort activities (P=0.00162). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a brief educational intervention focusing on neutral posture during cough, without voluntary pre-contraction of the PFMs, has no clinically significant influence on sEMG peak activity of the PFMs in women with cough-induced UI. However, this intervention can lead to a significant improvement in urinary symptoms and QoL at 6 weeks. These improvements seem to be independent of electromyographic PFMs peak activity recorded during cough. As such, our preliminary results pave the way for future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NP4.

Risk factors for postoperative pain after cystocele repair with mesh.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Prolapse is a common condition seen in women and its therapeutical management consists first and foremost of surgery. Postoperative pain is one of the most common side effects seen after surgery. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for postoperative pain after cystocele repair with mesh. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the multicenter randomized trial PROSPERE, which compared cystocele repair with mesh according to the vaginal or laparoscopic approach. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed by a pain-specific self-reported questionnaire (Questionnaire de Baudelocque). The statistical analysis is based on the Wilcoxon, Chi-squared, and Fisher's tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of postoperative pain (pain persisting more than 6 months) was 39% (80 out of 205, 95% CI 32.4-46.1), with 6.3% (13 out of 205) of chronic pain reports. Preoperative pain was the only statistically significant risk factor OR = 2.32 (p = 0,007; 95% CI 1.24-4.36). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must be careful with preoperative painful prolapse and should inform their patient of the risk of developing postoperative chronic pain.

COVID-19 Prevalence in UNIVI Group Nursing Homes and Multilevel Geriatric Hospitals: Epidemiological Study of Immunological Status with Rapid Serological Tests for Diagnostic Guidance and Follow Up.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To date, data are lacking on the proportion of residents, and employees who have actually been exposed to SARS-Cov-2 in nursing homes and geriatric healthcare institutions, as well as the evolution of their serological status and the recurrence of Covid-19. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 using NG Biotech rapid serological tests among caregivers and residents. The secondary objectives were to determine: prevalence according to RT PCR tests or clinical diagnosis; the risk factors (autonomy, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and clinical presentation (e.g. respiratory, abdominal or cutaneous symptoms, asthenia, fever) among residents; the risk factors (age, sex, profession, family situation) among caregivers; the evolution of the serological status at 1, 3 and 6 months using NG Biotech rapid serological tests; the symptomatic recurrence of Covid 19 at 1, 3 and 6 months. DESIGN: Multicentric prospective observational. SETTING: Study location: 27 nursing homes and 3 multilevel geriatric hospitals belonging to the UNIVI Group in France. PARTICIPANTS: 1334 professionals: 692 among multilevel geriatric hospitals (mean age: 43.6+/-11.8; 441 (82.4%) female) and 642 among nursing homes (mean age: 43.5+/-12.4; 685 (85.9%) female), and 1145 residents (mean age: 89+/-7.5; 898 (78.7%) female). MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence using NG Biotech rapid serological tests, medical diagnosis, RT-PCR tests.Risk factors among residents using the medical file and among caregivers using questionnaires.Clinical presentation in residents using the medical file. RESULTS: The prevalence using NG Biotech rapid serological test in residents was 14.4 % (168 of 1142 available diagnostics), the global prevalence (positive RT-PCR or positive serological test) was 22.7% (203 of 895 available diagnostics). The prevalence using NG Biotech rapid serological test in professionals was 12.8% (164 of 1315 available diagnostics), the global prevalence (positive RT-PCR test or positive serological test) was 23.8% (222 of 933 available diagnostics). The risk factors among residents were: living in an Alzheimer unit, and being a contact case. Being independent for activities of daily living was protective. The risk factor among caregivers was being a contact case. Another risk factor was the job; nurse assistants, nurses, and physicians were the most exposed. Residents had atypical clinical presentations including frequent geriatric syndromes (falls, delirium). 68.3% (71 of 104) of the initially positive residents still had a positive rapid serological test at 1 month follow up and 74 % (54 of 73) at 3 months follow up. 77.9% (88 of 113) of the initially positive employees still had a positive rapid serological test at 1 month follow up. Symptomatic reinfection was exceptional in caregivers or in residents during follow up. CONCLUSION: COVID 19 prevalence among caregivers and residents in nursing homes and geriatric health Institutions is underestimated when using only one method for diagnosis. Geriatric syndromes such as falls and delirium in residents should trigger further investigations on a COVID-19 cause. Immunity was persistent in ¾ of caregivers and residents during the 3 months follow up. The high prevalence of COVID 19 in geriatric institutions pleads in favor of the French vaccination policy, initially targeting as a priority the most vulnerable and dependent people, followed by staff members in healthcare institutions and nursing homes. More studies on the persistence of immunity and the perspective of Covid 19 mutations will help determine the long-term vaccine booster policy.

[Seroprevalence, risk factors and clinical presentation after the first wave of COVID-19 in nursing homes of the UNIVI group: The SEROCOVID study]. / Séroprévalence, facteurs de risque et présentation clinique après la première vague COVID-19 dans les EHPAD du groupe UNIVI : étude SEROCOVID.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic caused by SARS-COV-2 infection spread rapidly during the "first wave" through France between March and May 2020. It was responsible for high mortality in subjects with comorbidities and the elderly who lived in nursing homes. In May 2020, 75% of the deaths occurred in people over 75 years old in nursing homes. It is difficult to estimate accurately the prevalence of COVID-19 infection during this period because only 50% of the diagnoses in nursing homes were made by RT-PCR. During this period, the diagnosis was mainly based on the clinical symptoms. POPULATION AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study among residents of the 27 EHPADs in the UNIVI group (SEROCOVID study) between August 31 and October 16, 2020 using rapid ELISA serotests carried out by pricking the fingertip. We looked for the seroprevalence by the use of rapid serotests as well as the overall prevalence by cumulating the positive results of the RT-PCR when done and of the rapid serotest. The secondary objectives were the study of risk factors for infection by multivariate analysis as well as the description of the symptoms that led to the diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 1145 residents were included aged on average 89±7.5 years old (female 78.7%). The time between the COVID-19 disease and the rapid inclusion serotest was on average 5±1.7 months. The prevalence estimated by the three diagnostic evaluation methods (medical diagnosis, RT-PCR or by rapid serotest ELISA) is about 14%, underestimated compared to the overall prevalence at 22.7%. The study of risk factors in multivariate analysis shows that the most dependent residents, living in a protected unit due to behavioral disorders or whose close contact with a person with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of infection. Finally, the symptoms most frequently observed in residents differed from those in younger subjects with geriatric characteristics, such as the higher frequency of digestive symptoms and geriatric syndromes. Fever has only been observed in one third of cases in the elderly. Smell and taste disorders were seldom described. CONCLUSION: Our study provides an estimate of the overall prevalence as well as the mean seroprevalence of COVID-19 in EHPAD residents five months after the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. The difference between the two estimates is probably explained by the frailty and decreased immunity of the nursing home residents. Therefore, it would need to be reactivated by vaccination of all residents, even those already infected with SARS-COV-2. These elements corroborate the governmental strategy of vaccination deployed in all residents of EHPAD regardless of their previous contact with the virus.

Long-term outcomes of primary cystocele repair by transvaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic mesh sacropexy: extended follow up of the PROSPERE multicentre randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) and transvaginal mesh (TVM) at 4 years. DESIGN: Extended follow up of a randomised trial. SETTING: Eleven centres. POPULATION: Women with cystocele stage ≥2 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification [POP-Q], aged 45-75 years without previous prolapse surgery. METHODS: Synthetic non-absorbable mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space and sutured to the promontory (LS) or maintained by arms through pelvic ligaments and/or muscles (TVM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional outcomes (pelvic floor distress inventory [PFDI-20] as primary outcome); anatomical assessment (POP-Q), composite outcome of success; re-interventions for complications. RESULTS: A total of 220 out of 262 randomised patients have been followed at 4 years. PFDI-20 significantly improved in both groups and was better (but below the minimal clinically important difference) after LS (mean difference -7.2 points; 95% CI -14.0 to -0.05; P = 0.029). The improvement in quality of life and the success rate (LS 70%, 61-81% versus TVM 71%, 62-81%; hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.55-1.54; P = 0.75) were similar. POP-Q measurements did not differ, except for point C (LS -57 mm versus TVM -48 mm, P = 0.0093). The grade III or higher complication rate was lower after LS (2%, 0-4.7%) than after TVM (8.7%, 3.4-13.7%; hazard ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.007-21.0, P = 0.049)). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques provided improvement and similar success rates. LS had a better benefit-harm balance with fewer re-interventions due to complications. TVM remains an option when LS is not feasible. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: At 4 years, Laparoscopic Sacropexy (LS) had a better benefit-harm balance with fewer re-interventions due to complications than Trans-Vaginal Mesh (TVM).

Sagittal classification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: original description and therapeutic implications.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of AIS aims to correct the coronal and sagittal alignment of the spine. The global alignment of the spine may be normalized through reciprocal changes between the fused spine and adjacent segments. We propose a new classification system describing the specific sagittal patterns induced by AIS to define reproducible guidelines for the surgical strategy. METHODS: We analyzed 100 consecutive AIS patients aged between 12 and 18 years candidate for spinal fusion. The following parameters were measured and compared for each pattern: spino-pelvic parameters, magnitude and length of the lumbar sagittal angle, magnitude and length of the thoracic sagittal angles (T1T12 and T4T12 angles, TKmax), T10 L2 angle, C7 slope and C2C7 angle. RESULTS: Three parameters strongly differentiated the four patterns: thoracic sagittal angles (T1T12 and T4T12 angles, TKmax), T10 L2 angle and C7 slope. Less than half of the patients (44%) had a normal sagittal shape. Within, Type 2 characterized by thoracic hypokyphosis, Type 2a (thoracic hypokyphosis) were mostly Lenke type 1 or 2 curves, and type 2b (thoracic hypokyphosis with TL kyphosis) occurred specifically in double major or TL/L curves. Type 3 were two-curve sagittal shape with cervicothoracic kyphosis and TL lordosis (9%), mainly in Lenke 1 curves. DISCUSSION: This new classification summarizes all the pathological scenarios of the sagittal alignment of AIS into four patterns. A specific surgical planning can be extrapolated for each pattern. In type 1, the objective is to preserve the sagittal shape. In type 2, the objective is to restore thoracic kyphosis. In type 2b, TL junction should be straightened. In type 3, the objective is to reshape the lower arc of thoracic sagittal angle and straighten the TL junction. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.