Thrombocytopenia after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Thrombocytopenia frequently occurs after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) but its impact is poorly understood. We aimed to analyze the incidence, clinical impact, and predictors of acquired thrombocytopenia after TAVI. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter registry included 3913 patients undergoing TAVI with a baseline platelet count of ≥ 100 *109/L. Acquired thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in baseline platelet count of ≥ 50% (early nadir ≤ 3 days and late nadir ≥ 4 days) post-TAVI. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality and secondary endpoints were procedural safety and 2-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of acquired thrombocytopenia was 14.8% (early nadir: 61.5%, late nadir: 38.5%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in 112 (3.0%) patients and was significantly higher in those with thrombocytopenia (8.5% vs 2.0%, adjusted OR, 2.3; 95%CI, 1.3-4.2). Procedural safety was lower and 2-year mortality was higher in patients with thrombocytopenia vs those without (47.9 vs 33.0%; P < .001, and 30.2% vs 16.8%; HR, 2.2, 95%IC, 1.3-2.7) and especially in those with late nadir thrombocytopenia (54.2% vs 45.5%; P = .056, and 38.6% vs 23.8%, HR, 2.1; 95%CI, 1.5-2.9). Independent predictors of thrombocytopenia comprised baseline and procedural factors such as body surface area, absence of diabetes, poorer renal function, peripheral vascular disease, nontransfemoral access, vascular complications, type of transcatheter heart valve, and earlier TAVI procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Acquired thrombocytopenia was common (15%) after TAVI and was associated with increased short- and mid-term mortality and decreased procedural safety. Moreover, late thrombocytopenia compared with early thrombocytopenia was associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the etiologic mechanisms behind these findings.

Duration and clinical outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A multicentre "real-world practice" registry-based study.

Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) ought to be determined taking into account individual ischaemic or bleeding events risks. To date, studies have provided inconclusive evidence on the effects of prolonged DAPT. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this strategy following percutaneous revascularization in the context of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: Retrospectively from four centers in Madrid, we identified 750 consecutive ACS patients, divided in two groups of DAPT duration: <13 months and >13 months, with a mean follow-up of 48 months. Results: Patients with DAPT > 13 months had a higher non-adjusted incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (11.6% vs. 17.3%) and new revascularization (3.7% vs. 8.7%). Differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke were non-significant. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding (7.4% vs. 6.3%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the independent risk predictors of MACE were age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, p < 0.001) and multivessel disease (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.32-3.95, p = 0.003), whereas the independent protective predictor was normal hemoglobin (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.022). Conclusions: In this real-world registry cohort of ACS patients treated with PCI and 1 year of DAPT in Spain, we report a trend of increased rate of MACE and new revascularization not associated with TVR in patients with longer DAPT. Our findings support the need for future randomized controlled trials to confirm or refute these results.

Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID 19 international registry (HOPE COVID-19), rationale and design.

The disease produced by the new coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2), named COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease-2019) has recently been classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, scarce clinical data is available and generally limited to the Chinese population due to the first cases were identified in Wuhan (Hubei, China).This article describes the rationale and design of the HOPE COVID-19 (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation for COVID 19) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334291). With an ambispective cohort design, eligible patients are those discharged, deceased or alive, from any hospital center with a confirmed diagnosis or a COVID-19 high suspicion. With a current recruitment of more than 7000 cases, in 46 hospitals in 8 countries, since it is not possible to estimate the sample size based on literature reports, the investigators will try to get the maximum numbers of patients possible. The study primary objective is all cause mortality and aims to characterize the clinical profile of patients infected in order to develop a prognostic clinical score allowing, rapid logistic decision making. As secondary objectives, the analysis of other clinical events, the risk-adjusted influence of treatments and previous comorbidities of patients infected with the disease will be performed.The results of HOPE COVID-19 will contribute to a better understanding of this condition. We aim to describe the management of this condition as well as the outcomes in relation to the therapy chosen, in order to gain insight into improving patient care in the coming months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04334291.