A Framework for Assessing the Effect of Cardiac and Respiratory Motion for Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation Using a Digital Phantom With a 17-Segment Model: A STOPSTORM.eu Consortium Study.

PURPOSE: The optimal motion management strategy for patients receiving stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is not fully known. We developed a framework using a digital phantom to simulate cardiorespiratory motion in combination with different motion management strategies to gain insight into the effect of cardiorespiratory motion on STAR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 4-dimensional (4D) extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom was expanded with the 17-segment left ventricular (LV) model, which allowed placement of STAR targets in standardized ventricular regions. Cardiac- and respiratory-binned 4D computed tomography (CT) scans were simulated for free-breathing, reduced free-breathing, respiratory-gating, and breath-hold scenarios. Respiratory motion of the heart was set to population-averaged values of patients with VT: 6, 2, and 1 mm in the superior-inferior, posterior-anterior, and left-right direction, respectively. Cardiac contraction was adjusted by reducing LV ejection fraction to 35%. Target displacement was evaluated for all segments using envelopes encompassing the cardiorespiratory motion. Envelopes incorporating only the diastole plus respiratory motion were created to simulate the scenario where cardiac motion is not fully captured on 4D respiratory CT scans used for radiation therapy planning. RESULTS: The average volume of the 17 segments was 6 cm3 (1-9 cm3). Cardiac contraction-relaxation resulted in maximum segment (centroid) motion of 4, 6, and 3.5 mm in the superior-inferior, posterior-anterior, and left-right direction, respectively. Cardiac contraction-relaxation resulted in a motion envelope increase of 49% (24%-79%) compared with individual segment volumes, whereas envelopes increased by 126% (79%-167%) if respiratory motion also was considered. Envelopes incorporating only the diastole and respiration motion covered on average 68% to 75% of the motion envelope. CONCLUSIONS: The developed LV-segmental XCAT framework showed that free-wall regions display the most cardiorespiratory displacement. Our framework supports the optimization of STAR by evaluating the effect of (cardio)respiratory motion and motion management strategies for patients with VT.

Cosmetic Results and Side Effects of Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Versus Whole-Breast Irradiation for Low-Risk Invasive Carcinoma of the Breast: The Randomized Phase III IRMA Trial.

PURPOSE: The results in terms of side effects vary among the published accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) studies. Here, we report the 5-year results for cosmetic outcomes and toxicity of the IRMA trial. METHODS: We ran this randomized phase III trial in 35 centers. Women with stage I-IIA breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery, age ≥ 49 years, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either whole-breast irradiation (WBI) or external beam radiation therapy APBI (38.5 Gy/10 fraction twice daily). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary end point was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. We hereby present the analysis of the secondary outcomes, cosmesis, and normal tissue toxicity. All side effects were graded with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema. Analysis was performed with both intention-to-treat and as-treated approaches. RESULTS: Between March 2007 and March 2019, 3,309 patients were randomly assigned to 1,657 WBI and 1,652 APBI; 3,225 patients comprised the intention-to-treat population (1,623 WBI and 1,602 APBI). At a median follow-up of 5.6 (interquartile range, 4.0-8.4) years, adverse cosmesis in the APBI patients was higher than that in the WBI patients at 3 years (12.7% v 9.2%; P = .009) and at 5 years (14% v 9.8%; P = .012). Late soft tissue toxicity (grade ≥ 3: 2.8% APBI v 1% WBI, P < .0001) and late bone toxicity (grade ≥ 3: 1.1% APBI v 0% WBI, P < .0001) were significantly higher in the APBI arm. There were no significant differences in late skin and lung toxicities. CONCLUSION: External beam radiation therapy-APBI with a twice-daily IRMA schedule was associated with increased rates of late moderate soft tissue and bone toxicities, with a slight decrease in patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 5 years when compared with WBI, although overall toxicity was in an acceptable range.

Corrigendum to "Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands" [Tech. Innov. Patient Support Radiat. Oncol. 19 (2021) 26-32].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.06.004.].

Clinical implementation and validation of an automated adaptive workflow for proton therapy.

Background and purpose: Treatment quality of proton therapy can be monitored by repeat-computed tomography scans (reCTs). However, manual re-delineation of target contours can be time-consuming. To improve the workflow, we implemented an automated reCT evaluation, and assessed if automatic target contour propagation would lead to the same clinical decision for plan adaptation as the manual workflow. Materials and methods: This study included 79 consecutive patients with a total of 250 reCTs which had been manually evaluated. To assess the feasibility of automated reCT evaluation, we propagated the clinical target volumes (CTVs) deformably from the planning-CT to the reCTs in a commercial treatment planning system. The dose-volume-histogram parameters were extracted for manually re-delineated (CTVmanual) and deformably mapped target contours (CTVauto). It was compared if CTVmanual and CTVauto both satisfied/failed the clinical constraints. Duration of the reCT workflows was also recorded. Results: In 92% (N = 229) of the reCTs correct flagging was obtained. Only 4% (N = 9) of the reCTs presented with false negatives (i.e., at least one clinical constraint failed for CTVmanual, but all constraints were satisfied for CTVauto), while 5% (N = 12) of the reCTs led to a false positive. Only for one false negative reCT a plan adaption was made in clinical practice, i.e., only one adaptation would have been missed, suggesting that automated reCT evaluation was possible. Clinical introduction hereof led to a time reduction of 49 h (from 65 to 16 h). Conclusion: Deformable target contour propagation was clinically acceptable. A script-based automatic reCT evaluation workflow has been introduced in routine clinical practice.

Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region.

Background and purpose: User-adjustments after deep-learning (DL) contouring in radiotherapy were evaluated to get insight in real-world editing during clinical practice. This study assessed the amount, type and spatial regions of editing of auto-contouring for organs-at-risk (OARs) in routine clinical workflow for patients in the thorax region. Materials and methods: A total of 350 lung cancer and 362 breast cancer patients, contoured between March 2020 and March 2021 using a commercial DL-contouring method followed by manual adjustments were retrospectively analyzed. Subsampling was performed for some OARs, using an inter-slice gap of 1-3 slices. Commonly-used whole-organ contouring assessment measures were calculated, and all cases were registered to a common reference shape per OAR to identify regions of manual adjustment. Results were expressed as the median, 10th-90th percentile of adjustment and visualized using 3D renderings. Results: Per OAR, the median amount of editing was below 1 mm. However, large adjustments were found in some locations for most OARs. In general, enlarging of the auto-contours was needed. Subsampling DL-contours showed less adjustments were made in the interpolated slices compared to simulated no-subsampling for these OARs. Conclusion: The real-world performance of automatic DL-contouring software was evaluated and proven useful in clinical practice. Specific regions-of-adjustment were identified per OAR in the thorax region, and separate models were found to be necessary for specific clinical indications different from training data. This analysis showed the need to perform routine clinical analysis especially when procedures or acquisition protocols change to have the best configuration of the workflow.

Automatic dose verification system for breast radiotherapy: Method validation, contour propagation and DVH parameters evaluation.

PURPOSE: Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) strategies allow detecting and monitoring anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). However, assessing the dosimetric impact of anatomical changes is not straightforward. In current IGRT strategies dose volume histograms (DVH) are not available due to lack of contours and dose recalculations on the cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan. This study investigates the feasibility of using automatically calculated DVH parameters in CBCTs using an independent dose calculation engine and propagated contours. METHOD: A prospective study (NCT03385031) of thirty-one breast cancer patients who received additional CBCT imaging (N = 70) was performed. Manual and automatically propagated contours were generated for all CBCTs and an automatic dose recalculation was performed. Differences between planned and CBCT-derived DVH parameters (mean and maximum dose to targets, 95% volume coverage to targets and mean heart dose (MHD)) were calculated using the dose verification system with manual and propagated contours and, in both cases, benchmarked against DVH differences quantified in the TPS using manually contoured CBCTs. RESULTS: Differences in DVH parameters between the TPS and dose verification system with propagated contours were -1.3% to 0.7% (95% CI) for mean dose to the target volume, -0.3 to 0.2 Gy (95% CI) in MHD and -3.9% to 2.9% (95% CI) in target volume coverage. CONCLUSION: The use of an independent fully automatic dose verification system with contour propagation showed to be feasible and sufficiently reliable to recalculate CBCT based DVHs during breast EBRT. Volume coverage parameters, i.e. V95%, proved to be especially sensitive to contouring differences.

Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: The aim was to reach consensus in The Netherlands on which parameters should be used to evaluate breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Benchmark Case with delineated planning target volumes (PTVs) and Organs At Risk (OARs) was sent to all Dutch radiotherapy centres in combination with a questionnaire, with the request to generate RT plans prescribing 15 times 2.67 Gy for four different treatment indications according to the institutional irradiation technique. The plans and accompanying questionnaire answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. These results, together with a harmonisation proposal, were sent to all centres. The proposal was discussed at a meeting of the Dutch Society of Radiation Oncology breast cancer platform. Distinct parameters were accepted if consensus on them was reached. RESULTS: 19 out of 20 Dutch departments participated in this study. PTV coverage varied considerably, with D98% between 63% and 99% for the breast and between 37% and 97% for the internal mammary nodes (IMN). Also substantial OAR dose differences were observed, with e.g. mean heart doses ranging between 1.85 Gy and 5.42 Gy in case the IMN were included in the PTV. For evaluation of the PTVs D98%, D2% and Dmean were chosen to report on, with target values of ≥ 95% (90% for the PTV_IMN), ≤ 107%, and 99-101%, respectively. For OARs, consensus was reached on the parameters to be evaluated, without target values: Dmean of the heart, Dmean and V5% of the lungs, and in case of periclavicular radiotherapy V30Gy of the thyroid gland. For patients younger than 40 years a contralateral mean breast dose of ≤ 1 Gy was agreed upon. CONCLUSION: A new Dutch consensus guideline for evaluation of breast cancer RT plans has been established.

Selection criteria for early breast cancer patients in the DBCG proton trial - The randomised phase III trial strategy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiotherapy of internal mammary nodes (IMN) improves survival in high-risk early breast cancer patients but inevitably leads to more dose to heart and lung. Target coverage is often compromised to meet heart/lung dose constraints. We estimate heart and lung dose when target coverage is not compromised in consecutive patients. These estimates are used to guide the choice of selection criteria for the randomised Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) Proton Trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 179 breast cancer patients already treated with loco-regional IMN radiotherapy from 18 European departments were included. If the clinically delivered treatment plan did not comply with defined target coverage requirements, the plan was modified retrospectively until sufficient coverage was reached. The choice of selection criteria was based on the estimated number of eligible patients for different heart and lung dose thresholds in combination with proton therapy capacity limitations and dose-response relationships for heart and lung. RESULTS: Median mean heart dose was 3.0 Gy (range, 1.1-8.2 Gy) for left-sided and 1.4 Gy (0.4-11.5 Gy) for right-sided treatment plans. Median V17Gy/V20Gy (hypofractionated/normofractionated plans) for ipsilateral lung was 31% (9-57%). The DBCG Radiotherapy Committee chose mean heart dose ≥ 4 Gy and/or lung V17Gy/V20Gy ≥ 37% as thresholds for inclusion in the randomised trial. Using these thresholds, we estimate that 22% of patients requiring loco-regional IMN radiotherapy will be eligible for the trial. CONCLUSION: The patient selection criteria for the DBCG Proton Trial are mean heart dose ≥ 4 Gy and/or lung V17Gy/V20Gy ≥ 37%.

Visually guided inspiration breath-hold facilitated with nasal high flow therapy in locally advanced lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reducing breathing motion in radiotherapy (RT) is an attractive strategy to reduce margins and better spare normal tissues. The objective of this prospective study (NCT03729661) was to investigate the feasibility of irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with visually guided moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (IBH) using nasal high-flow therapy (NHFT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Locally advanced NSCLC patients undergoing photon RT were given NHFT with heated humidified air (flow: 40 L/min with 80% oxygen) through a nasal cannula. IBH was monitored by optical surface tracking (OST) with visual feedback. At a training session, patients had to hold their breath as long as possible, without and with NHFT. For the daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and RT treatment in IBH, patients were instructed to keep their BH as long as it felt comfortable. OST was used to analyze stability and reproducibility of the BH, and CBCT to analyze daily tumor position. Subjective tolerance was measured with a questionnaire at 3 time points. RESULTS: Of 10 included patients, 9 were treated with RT. Seven (78%) completed the treatment with NHFT as planned. At the training session, the mean BH length without NHFT was 39 s (range 15-86 s), and with NHFT 78 s (range 29-223 s) (p = .005). NHFT prolonged the BH duration by a mean factor of 2.1 (range 1.1-3.9s). The mean overall stability and reproducibility were within 1 mm. Subjective tolerance was very good with the majority of patients having no or minor discomfort caused by the devices. The mean inter-fraction tumor position variability was 1.8 mm (-1.1-8.1 mm;SD 2.4 mm). CONCLUSION: NHFT for RT treatment of NSCLC in BH is feasible, well tolerated and significantly increases the breath-hold duration. Visually guided BH with OST is stable and reproducible. We therefore consider this an attractive patient-friendly approach to treat lung cancer patients with RT in BH.

ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline for target volume delineation in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy after implant-based immediate reconstruction for early stage breast cancer.

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates after mastectomy are increasing. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) contouring guidelines for target volumes in the setting of IBR are lacking. Therefore, many patients who have had IBR receive PMRT to target volumes similar to conventional simulator-based whole breast irradiation. The aim of this paper is to describe delineation guidelines for PMRT after implant-based IBR based on a thorough understanding of the surgical procedures, disease stage, patterns of recurrence and radiation techniques. They are based on a consensus endorsed by a global multidisciplinary group of breast cancer experts.

A comparison of a brachytherapy and an external beam radiotherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: local and any recurrences.

PURPOSE: Adding a tumour bed boost to whole-breast irradiation in breast-conserving therapy reduces local recurrence rates. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the boost technique influences the magnitude of the effect. METHODS: Patients treated with breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2007 were included in the analysis. Three groups were considered according to the applied boost technique: electrons, brachytherapy or photons. The endpoints were local recurrence and any recurrence. Cox regression models were used and correction for the confounders in the association between boost technique and outcome was performed using multivariable models. RESULTS: 1879 tumours were included in the analysis. 1448 tumours (77.1%) were treated with an electron boost, 334 (17.8%) with a brachytherapy boost and 97 (5.2%) with a photon boost. Median follow-up was 13.1 years. The 10-year local recurrence rate was 2.2%. In multivariable analysis with correction for age, pathological Tumour or Node stage (pT, pN), chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, there was no significant difference between the three groups for the local recurrence risk (p = 0.89). 10-year any recurrence rate was 10.8%. In multivariable analysis with correction for age, pT, pN, resection margins, radiotherapy, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, there was no significant difference between the brachytherapy group and the electron group or the photon group (p = 0.11 and p = 0.28, respectively). The photon group had more recurrences compared to the electron group (Hazard Ratio 1.81, 95% Confidence Interval 1.12; 2.92, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence risk reduction of the tumour bed boost in breast-conserving therapy is not influenced by the applied boost technique.

Three-dimensional dose evaluation in breast cancer patients to define decision criteria for adaptive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Dose-guided adaptive radiation therapy (DGART) is the systematic evaluation and adaptation of the dose delivery during treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this study is to define quantitative action levels for DGART by evaluating changes in 3D dose metrics in breast cancer and correlate them with clinical expert evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three breast cancer treatment plans were evaluated, that were clinically adapted based on institutional IGRT guidelines. Reasons for adaptation were variation in seroma, hematoma, edema, positioning or problems using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold. Sixteen patients received a uniform dose to the breast (clinical target volume 1; CTV1). Six patients were treated with a simultaneous integrated boost to CTV2. The original plan was copied to the CT during treatment (re-CT) or to the stitched cone-beam CT (CBCT). Clinical expert evaluation of the re-calculated dose distribution and extraction of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were performed. The extreme scenarios were evaluated, assuming all treatment fractions were given to the original planning CT (pCT), re-CT or CBCT. Reported results are mean ± SD. RESULTS: DVH results showed a mean dose (Dmean) difference between pCT and re-CT of -0.4 ± 1.4% (CTV1) and -1.4 ± 2.1% (CTV2). The difference in V95% was -2.6 ± 4.4% (CTV1) and -9.8 ± 8.3% (CTV2). Clinical evaluation and DVH evaluation resulted in a recommended adaptation in 17/23 or 16/23 plans, respectively. Applying thresholds on the DVH parameters: Dmean CTV, V95% CTV, Dmax, mean lung dose, volume exceeding 107% (uniform dose) or 90% (SIB) of the prescribed dose enabled the identification of patients with an assumed clinically relevant dose difference, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 1.0. Re-calculation on CBCT imaging identified the same plans for adaptation as re-CT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical expert evaluation can be related to quantitative DVH parameters on re-CT or CBCT imaging to select patients for DGART.

Boost delineation in breast radiation therapy: Isotropic versus anisotropic margin expansion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to compare isotropic and anisotropic margin expansion with regard to the size of the clinical target volume boost (CTVboost) and the interobserver variability (IOV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Lumpectomy cavities marked with 3 or more surgical clips were delineated by 6 radiation oncologists who specialized in breast radiation therapy. CTVboost anisotropic was created by manually expanding the tumor bed with an anisotropic margin of 15 mm (20 mm in case of extensive intraductal component) minus the surgical free margins in 6 directions (anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and superoinferior). For the CTVboost isotropic, the tumor bed was enlarged with an isotropic margin of 15 mm (20 mm in case of extensive intraductal component) minus the minimal surgical free margin. The volumes of the delineated CTVboost (cm3) were measured. To assess the IOV, the Jaccard index (JI), defined as the intersection divided by the size of the union of the sample sets, was used (ideal value = 1). The JI was calculated for each case and each observer pair. Linear mixed models were used for all analyses. RESULTS: A total of 444 delineated tumor beds were evaluated. The mean volume of the CTVboost almost doubled by expanding the tumor bed with an isotropic margin compared with anisotropic margins (CTVboost isotropic 94 mL [12.5-331.0] vs CTVboost anisotropic 50 mL [3.2-332.7]; P = .0006). The IOV, assessed by the JI, significantly decreased by using isotropic versus anisotropic margin expansion (JICTV boost isotropic 0.73 [0.02-0.92] vs JICTV boost anisotropic 0.51 [0.0-0.8]; P< .0001). Because of the known positive correlation of the IOV and larger volumes, we corrected for CTVboost volumes. With this correction, the difference in IOV remains highly significant (P < .0001) in favor of isotropic margin expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anisotropic margin expansion from tumorbed to CTVboost isotropic significantly reduced the volume of the delineated CTVboost with a factor of 1.9 compared with isotropic margin expansion, but it substantially increased the interobserver variability.

Is the use of a preoperative computed tomography beneficial to reduce the interobserver variability of the CTVboost delineation for breast radiation therapy?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of a preoperative (preop) computed tomography (CT) reduces (1) the clinical target volume boost (CTVboost) and (2) the interobserver variability (IOV) of the delineated CTVboost in breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In patients treated with breast-conserving therapy, 3 CT scans in treatment position were performed: (1) preop; (2) after surgery, prechemotherapy (postop); and (3) postchemotherapy (postchemo). Six radiation-oncologists delineated the tumor bed and CTVboost before and after fusion of the preop CT. To assess the IOV, the Jaccard index was used. Linear mixed models were performedfor all analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-two lumpectomy cavities were evaluated in 22 patients. No difference in CTVboost using the fusion of the preop CT (50.0 cm3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35.6-64.4) compared with no fusion (49.0 cm3; 95% CI, 34.6-63.4) (P = .6) was observed. A significant increase in IOV was shown with the fusion of the preop CT; the mean Jaccard index of the CTVboost delineation of postop and postchemo CT together without the fusion of the preop CT was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.49-0.57) versus 0.50 (95% CI, 0.46-0.53) with fusion (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit of using a preop CT to reduce the volume or the interobserver variability of the delineated CTVboost for breast radiation therapy.

Efficacy and workload analysis of a fixed vertical couch position technique and a fixed-action-level protocol in whole-breast radiotherapy.

Quantification of the setup errors is vital to define appropriate setup margins preventing geographical misses. The no-action-level (NAL) correction protocol reduces the systematic setup errors and, hence, the setup margins. The manual entry of the setup corrections in the record-and-verify software, however, increases the susceptibility of the NAL protocol to human errors. Moreover, the impact of the skin mobility on the anteroposterior patient setup reproducibility in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) is unknown. In this study, we therefore investigated the potential of fixed vertical couch position-based patient setup in WBRT. The possibility to introduce a threshold for correction of the systematic setup errors was also explored. We measured the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and superior-inferior setup errors during fractions 1-12 and weekly thereafter with tangential angled single modality paired imaging. These setup data were used to simulate the residual setup errors of the NAL protocol, the fixed vertical couch position protocol, and the fixed-action-level protocol with different correction thresholds. Population statistics of the setup errors of 20 breast cancer patients and 20 breast cancer patients with additional regional lymph node (LN) irradiation were calculated to determine the setup margins of each off-line correction protocol. Our data showed the potential of the fixed vertical couch position protocol to restrict the systematic and random anteroposterior residual setup errors to 1.8 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively. Compared to the NAL protocol, a correction threshold of 2.5mm reduced the frequency of mediolateral and superior-inferior setup corrections with 40% and 63%, respectively. The implementation of the correction threshold did not deteriorate the accuracy of the off-line setup correction compared to the NAL protocol. The combination of the fixed vertical couch position protocol, for correction of the anteroposterior setup error, and the fixed-action-level protocol with 2.5 mm correction threshold, for correction of the mediolateral and the superior-inferior setup errors, was proved to provide adequate and comparable patient setup accuracy in WBRT and WBRT with additional LN irradiation.

A comparison of three different radiotherapy boost techniques after breast conserving therapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Compare different boost techniques after breast conserving therapy (BCT) in terms of local and loco-regional recurrences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2005, patients treated with BCT for invasive breast cancer (BC) were included. An electron boost (EB) was performed for a superficial boost-volume (less than 29 mm under the epidermis), in all other cases a brachytherapy boost (BTB) was proposed. When patients refused a BTB or it was not possible for technical reasons, a photon boost (PB) was given. The primary endpoints were local and loco-regional recurrences. Secondary endpoints were metastasis-free and overall survival. RESULTS: 1379 patients were eligible for analysis. Most patients (1052) received an EB, 225 a BTB and 76 a PB. At a median follow-up of 8.8 years, 35 (2.5%) patients developed a local or loco-regional recurrence. Ten years local relapse-free rate was 97.9%. No differences between boost techniques were observed in relapse risk, metastasis-free and overall survival after multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: In women treated with BCT followed by a boost irradiation to the tumor bed, no difference in local and loco-regional recurrence, metastasis-free and overall survival was observed comparing three different boost techniques. Outcome was excellent regardless of the boost technique.

Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy.

Image-guided position verification in breast radiotherapy is accurately performed with kilovoltage cone beam CT (kV-CBCT). The technique is, however, time-consuming and there is a risk for patient collision. Online position verification performed with orthogonal-angled mixed modality paired imaging is less time-consuming at the expense of inferior accuracy compared to kV-CBCT. We therefore investigated whether a new tangential-angled single modality paired imaging technique can reduce the residual error (RE) of orthogonal-angled mixed modality paired imaging. The latter was applied to 20 breast cancer patients. Tangential-angled single modality paired imaging was investigated in 20 breast and 20 breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation. The central lung distance (CLD) residual error and the longitudinal residual error were determined during the first 5 treatment fractions. Off-line matching of the tangential breast field images, acquired after online position correction, was used. The mean, systematic, and random REs of each patient group were calculated. The systematic REs were checked for significant differences using the F-test. Tangential-angled single modality paired imaging significantly reduced the systematic CLD residual error of orthogonal-angled mixed modality paired imaging for the breast cancer patients, from 2.3 mm to 1.0 mm, and also significantly decreased the systematic longitudinal RE from 2.4 mm to 1.3 mm. PTV margins, which account for the residual error (PTVRE), were also calculated. The PTVRE margin needed to account for the RE of orthogonal-angled mixed modality paired imaging (i.e., 8 mm) was halved by tangential-angled single modality paired imaging. The differences between the systematic REs of tangential-angled single modality paired imaging of the breast cancer patients and the breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation were not significant, yielding comparable PTVRE margins. In this study, we showed that tangential-angled single modality paired imaging is superior to orthogonal-angled mixed modality paired imaging to correct the position errors in whole breast radiotherapy.