A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.

Pemetrexed and malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) continues to be a challenging problem; because few patients may be treated with radical surgery and conventional chemotherapy have achieved very dismal results. Pemetrexed is a new drug with multitarget antifolate activity which seems to be particularly active in many solid tumors and also in MPM. The principal clinical experiences of pemetrexed alone or in combination with other compounds, chiefly platinum and its derivative, are reported. The Italian study on 1114 cases of MPM treated over 30 months is discussed and the definitive results will be available after a complete external review of all responsive patients.

Prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwashes does not reduce frequency and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with solid tumors undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mouthwashes in the prevention of severe mucositis induced by high doses of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients affected by solid tumors and undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue were randomized to receive placebo versus GM-CSF mouthwash 150 micro g/day. Patients were stratified on the basis of the conditioning treatment and the consequent different risk of severe oral mucositis. Treatment was administered from the day after the end of chemotherapy until the resolution of stomatitis and/or neutrophil recovery. RESULTS: The statistical analyses were intention-to-treat and involved all patients who entered the study. The severity of stomatitis was evaluated daily by the physicians according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Both study and control groups were compared with respect to the frequency [30% versus 36%, chi(2) exact test, not significant (NS)] and mean duration (4.8 +/- 4.7 versus 4.4 +/- 2.7 days, t-test, NS) of severe stomatitis (grade > or =3). Oral pain was evaluated daily by patients themselves by means of a 10 cm analog visual scale: the mean (+/- standard error of the mean) maximum mucositis scores were 4.8 +/- 3.5 versus 4.2 +/- 3.5 cm (t-test, NS). Furthermore, 15/46 patients in the study group (33%) and 19/44 patients in the control group experienced pain requiring opioids (chi(2) exact test, NS). CONCLUSION: We did not find any evidence to indicate that prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwash can help to reduce the severity of mucositis in the setting of the patients we studied.

Neoadjuvant high dose chemotherapy plus peripheral blood progenitor cells in inflammatory breast cancer: a multicenter phase II pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the introduction of combined modality therapy, approximately 30% of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) are alive and free of disease at 5 years, but the lack of control of systemic disease continues to be the main reason for treatment failure. The importance of the response to primary chemotherapy and, in particular, complete tumor regression after primary chemotherapy have previously been described to be among the most reliable prognostic factors along with the dose intensity of doxorubicin. DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate pathologic response rate and toxicity of neoadjuvant high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in patients affected by IBC, 21 patients were enrolled in a study in which it was planned that they would receive 4 courses of epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as induction and mobilizing chemotherapy. Patients with non-progressive disease were intended to receive 2 consecutive courses of a combination of high doses of mitoxantrone 40 mg/m(2) , thiotepa 500 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg as a conditioning regimen. RESULTS: PBPC collection was successful in 20/21 patients. Twelve patients received a single course of HDCT, whereas 7/20 patients underwent a double procedure. At a median follow up of 48 months, 20/21 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 19/21 for response. At surgery 4/19 patients (21%) had no evidence of viable tumor cells in the breast and in axillary nodes, while 4 (21%) and 11 patients (58%) had microscopic and macroscopic disease, respectively. Eight patients have relapsed (35%) so far at a median of 16 months (9-54) from diagnosis. Eleven patients remain alive without evidence of disease. Five out of 20 patients experienced severe cardiotoxicity with congestive heart failure (CHF) which was responsible for the only treatment-related death. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: This neoadjuvant HDCT regimen seems to be very effective in terms of objective responses, but we observed a high rate of cardiotoxicity and only a few patients were able to receive the two planned courses of high dose chemotherapy.

A sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment for patients with malignant gliomas: a phase II pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment on the basis of an earlier report by The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with histologically diagnosed malignant gliomas entered the study. Fifteen patients had glioblastoma multiforme (83%). BCNU (40 mg/sqm/die) and Cisplatin (40 mg/sqm/die) were administered concurrently for 3 days every 3-4 weeks. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy whole cranial irradiation plus a 15 Gy boost on the preoperative volume. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. After chemotherapy we obtained 3 CRs (complete remission) and 4 PRs (partial remission) (RR (response rate 54%). Three PRs were converted to CRs after radiotherapy, for a complete remission rate of 46% (6/13). The median duration of response was 10 months. The median survival of the entire patients population was 9 months with 33% survival rates at 1 year. Hematological toxicity grade 4 in one patient and grade 3 in two patients were the major complications due to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our sequential chemo-radiotherapeutic regimen appears to have significant activity in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas.

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors following peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue after high-dose chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a prospective study.

The use of high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic rescue is increasing worldwide for solid tumors. Several studies have suggested that the period of absolute neutrophil count (ANC, < 500/ml) may be shortened in patients who receive peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). To estimate the clinical value of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, we examined a cohort of 26 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer who received one or two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with PBPC rescue with or without filgrastim. Thirty-five courses of high-dose ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) chemotherapy were administered and evaluated. All patients received PBPC rescue. Sixteen patients (21 courses) received subcutaneous filgrastim (5 mg/kg) following PBPC infusion. Recovery to > or = 500 ANC occurred at a median time of 7 days post PBPC infusion among patients who received filgrastim versus 10 days among patients who received standard support care only (P < 0.01). The administration of filgrastim was not associated with a reduction in the duration of hospitalization, in the total number of days on nonprophylactic antibiotics, number of red blood cell transfusions, time to platelet engraftment, or number of febrile days. This could be the consequence of the high hematopoietic cell dose administered in the study. Therefore, any effect of filgrastim was probably masked by the use of a large number of PBPC. Larger prospective randomized studies, specifically focused on the utility of the administration of growth factors following high-dose chemotherapy and PBPC rescue, may be warranted to know whether the administration of filgrastim after PBPC transplantation is really necessary.

Paclitaxel and radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Sixteen patients affected by previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIB or IV received radiotherapy and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) as radiation sensitizer in an open, nonrandomized pilot study to find the maximum tolerated dose of the drug concomitantly combined with radiation. Paclitaxel was given as a 3-hour infusion once weekly at a dose escalating by 10 mg/m2/wk for every patient cohort, starting at 40 mg/m2/wk and continuing to 80 mg/m2/wk. Conventionally fractionated (2 Gy/d for 5 d/wk for 5 weeks) radiotherapy up to 50 Gy was delivered to the primary tumor and mediastinum with a 6-mv linear accelerator. Hematologic toxicity has been very low; grade 3 World Health Organization nonhematalogic toxicities have been registered only at the 80 mg/m2/wk dose level. Seven patients achieved a major response, three patients had stable disease, and five patients progressed; three patients are still responding, whereas the others are relapsed and five of them died of disease. The median duration of response was 5 months. Paclitaxel may be safely combined with radiation at the maximum tolerated dose of 70 mg/m2/wk. Our data seem to confirm the radiosensitizing effect of the drug, independent of the dose level. Low doses of paclitaxel given as a single agent are unable to control metastatic disease.

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

To establish the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) as a radiosensitizing agent and to determine its optimal therapeutic dose when combined with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, a phase I/II study was undertaken in 16 treatment-naive patients. Beginning at 40 mg/m2/wk with doses escalated in 10 mg/m2 increments until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered, paclitaxel was administered over 3 hours to successive three-patient cohorts. Radiotherapy (2 Gy/d x 5 d/wk; maximum total dose, 50 Gy) was delivered after the paclitaxel infusion. Treatment continued for 5 successive weeks. All 16 patients are evaluable for response and toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was low, with red blood cells and platelets remaining stable and leukocyte decreases (mean, 60%) attributed to radiotherapy. Nonhematologic toxicity included grade 2/3 esophagitis and neurologic sequelae. Responses were noted at all paclitaxel dose levels, including two complete and five partial responses, but the median time to progression was only 5 months. Paclitaxel may be combined safely with radiotherapy without major toxicity, and the radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel was evident at all doses.

Do Italian small cell lung cancer (SCLC) specialists share a common language? An analysis based on 549 questionnaires.

Different specialists are involved in the treatment of SCLC: medical oncologists, pneumologists, radiotherapists, and thoracic surgeons; only in large institutions the therapeutic policy is the result of a multidisciplinary approach. In order to investigate the opinions of the Italian physicians about the state of the art in the diagnosis and treatment of SCLC, 2369 questionnaires have been sent to an equal number of specialists. Each questionnaire contained 16 topics addressing what we consider major open questions. The analysis is based on 549 interpretable questionnaires received back (23.1%). The general attitude of responding physicians is quite pessimistic on the present state of the art; the large majority considering insufficient the current knowledge of both clinical and basic research. Some differences have been registered, among different specialists, regarding the role of surgery and radiation therapy in prolonging the expected survival; while a nearly unanimous consensus has been reached on the role of radiation therapy for local control. Optimism merges about the possibilities of ameliorating the survival in the next decades: 48% have confidence in new drugs, 45% in the development of integrated modalities, and 41% in the application of basic research.