ABSTRACT
During SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the assessment of immune protection of people at risk of severe infection was an important goal. The appearance of VOCs (Variant of Concern) highlighted the limits of evaluating immune protection through the humoral response. While the humoral response partly loses its neutralizing activity, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response strongly cross protects against VOCs becoming an indispensable tool to assess immune protection. We compared two techniques available in laboratory to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory T cell response in a cohort of infected or vaccinated patients with different levels of risk to develop a severe disease: the ELISpot assay and the T-Cell Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay respectively exploring IFNγ production and cell proliferation. We showed that the ELISpot assay detected more anti-Spike memory T cell response than the Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay. We next observed that the use of two different suppliers as antigenic source in the ELISpot assay did not affect the detection of anti-Spike memory T cell response. Finally, we explored a new approach for defining the positivity threshold, using unsupervised mixed Gaussian modeling, challenging the traditional ROC curve used by the supplier. That will be helpful in endemic situation where it could be difficult to recruit "negative" patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay , Memory T Cells , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Memory T Cells/immunology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cell Proliferation , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Adult , Aged , Interferon-gamma/immunology , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Immunologic MemoryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown rates of surgical resection of up to 41% in stricturing pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). In this retrospective multicenter study, our aims were to identify clinical risk factors and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) features of small bowel strictures associated with surgery. METHODS: Pediatric patients with symptomatic stricturing small bowel CD (defined as obstructive symptoms or proximal dilatation on MRE) confirmed by MRE between 2010 and 2020 were recruited from 12 French tertiary hospitals. Patient characteristics were compared by surgical outcome multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (61% boys) aged 12.2 ± 2.7 years at diagnosis of CD were included. Median duration of CD before diagnosis of stricture was 11.7 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 25-75: 1.2-29.9). Nineteen (34%) patients had stricturing phenotype (B2) at baseline. Treatments received before stricture diagnosis included MODULEN-IBD (n = 31), corticosteroids (n = 35), antibiotics (n = 10), anti-TNF (n = 27), immunosuppressants (n = 28). Thirty-six patients (64%) required surgery, within 4.8 months (IQR: 25-75: 1.8-17.3) after stricture diagnosis. Parameters associated with surgical resection were antibiotic exposure before stricture diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 15.62 [3.35-72.73], p = 0.0005), Crohn's disease obstructive symptoms score (CDOS) > 4 (aOR: 3.04 [1.15-8.03], p = 0.02) and dilation proximal to stricture >28 mm (aOR: 3.62 [1.17-11.20], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In this study, antibiotic treatment before stricture diagnosis, intensity of obstructive symptoms, and diameter of dilation proximal to small bowel stricture on MRE were associated with risk for surgical resection.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Intestine, Small , Humans , Crohn Disease/surgery , Crohn Disease/complications , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Risk Factors , Child , Intestine, Small/surgery , Intestine, Small/pathology , Adolescent , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , France , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) are recommended for induction and maintenance of remission in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). ADA is now often used in first line due to its efficacy and tolerability, but a loss of response (LOR) can occur over time. The aim was to assess the efficacy of IFX as second line therapy after LOR or intolerance to ADA in pediatric CD patients at 1 year. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and multicenter study in France among the "GETAID pédiatrique" centers between April 2019 and April 2022. CD patients under 18 years old and treated with IFX after ADA failure or intolerance were included. We collected anthropometric, clinical, and biological data at baseline (start of IFX), at 6 and 12 months. Clinical remission was defined by a Weighted Pediatric CD Activity Index (wPCDAI) score less than 12.5 points. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients included in our study, 27 (84.4%) were still on IFX at 12 months of the switch. Among them, 13 had discontinued ADA because of a LOR, 12 for insufficient response and 2 due to primary nonresponse. At M12, 22 patients were in corticosteroid free clinical remission (68.7%). Under IFX, the wPCDAI decreased over time (47.5 ± 24.1, 16.6 ± 21.2 and 9.7 ± 19.0 at M0, M6 and M12 respectively). The only factor associated with clinical remission at 12 months was absence of perianal disease at the end of the IFX induction. CONCLUSIONS: IFX is effective in maintaining remission at 1 year in pediatric CD patients experiencing a LOR or intolerance with ADA, and IFX could be an interesting therapeutic choice instead of other biologics in this situation.