Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet ; 190(2): 206-214, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36156392

ABSTRACT

Fabry disease newborn screening (NBS) has been ongoing in Oregon for over 41 months by first-tier enzyme quantitation and second-tier DNA testing. During that period the majority of abnormal referrals received (34/60) were for the presence of the controversial c.427G > A (p.Ala143Thr) aka A143T and the majority of non-A143T referrals were for other variants of uncertain significance (17/60) resulting in at least 32 infants with an inconclusive case outcome even after clinical evaluation and/or diagnostic testing. To date there has been no significant family history or onset of symptoms in individuals with an inconclusive outcome. Based on our experience, we have developed a framework for approaching A143T and other variants of uncertain clinical significance in an attempt to balance sensitivity with the unnecessary medicalization of healthy infants.


Subject(s)
Fabry Disease , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Fabry Disease/diagnosis , Fabry Disease/epidemiology , Fabry Disease/genetics , Neonatal Screening/methods , Oregon/epidemiology
2.
Front Genet ; 13: 867337, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35938011

ABSTRACT

Each year, through population-based newborn screening (NBS), 1 in 294 newborns is identified with a condition leading to early treatment and, in some cases, life-saving interventions. Rapid advancements in genomic technologies to screen, diagnose, and treat newborns promise to significantly expand the number of diseases and individuals impacted by NBS. However, expansion of NBS occurs slowly in the United States (US) and almost always occurs condition by condition and state by state with the goal of screening for all conditions on a federally recommended uniform panel. The Newborn Screening Translational Research Network (NBSTRN) conducted the NBS Expansion Study to describe current practices, identify expansion challenges, outline areas for improvement in NBS, and suggest how models could be used to evaluate changes and improvements. The NBS Expansion Study included a workshop of experts, a survey of clinicians, an analysis of data from online repositories of state NBS programs, reports and publications of completed pilots, federal committee reports, and proceedings, and the development of models to address the study findings. This manuscript (Part One) reports on the design, execution, and results of the NBS Expansion Study. The Study found that the capacity to expand NBS is variable across the US and that nationwide adoption of a new condition averages 9.5 years. Four factors that delay and/or complicate NBS expansion were identified. A companion paper (Part Two) presents a use case for each of the four factors and highlights how modeling could address these challenges to NBS expansion.

3.
Am J Med Genet A ; 185(1): 134-140, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098355

ABSTRACT

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I)/Hurler syndrome newborn screening was added to the recommended uniform screening panel (RUSP) in 2016. As states have added screening for MPS I, programs have reported increased rates of false positives. Reasons for false positive screens include carrier status, true false positive, late-onset/attenuated forms, and in about half of cases, pseudodeficiency alleles. These alleles have DNA variants that can cause falsely decreased enzyme activity on biochemical enzyme studies and have increased frequency in individuals of African American and African descent. We describe the District of Columbia (DC) experience with MPS I screening from December 2017 to February 2019. In the context of a review of the literature on newborn screening and family experiences and this DC-based experience, we offer potential solutions to address preliminary concerns regarding this screening. The impact of overrepresentation of screen positives in a minority group and unintentional creation of health disparities and community wariness regarding medical genetics evaluations must be considered to improve the newborn screen programs nationally and internationally.


Subject(s)
Mucopolysaccharidosis I/diagnosis , Mucopolysaccharidosis I/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Black or African American/genetics , Alleles , Dried Blood Spot Testing , Ethnicity/genetics , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mucopolysaccharidosis I/genetics , Mucopolysaccharidosis I/pathology
4.
Int J Neonatal Screen ; 6(1): 10, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33073008

ABSTRACT

Enzyme-based newborn screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) has a high false-positive rate due to the prevalence of pseudodeficiency alleles, often resulting in unnecessary and costly follow up. The glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), dermatan sulfate (DS) and heparan sulfate (HS) are both substrates for α-l-iduronidase (IDUA). These GAGs are elevated in patients with MPS I and have been shown to be promising biomarkers for both primary and second-tier testing. Since February 2016, we have measured DS and HS in 1213 specimens submitted on infants at risk for MPS I based on newborn screening. Molecular correlation was available for 157 of the tested cases. Samples from infants with MPS I confirmed by IDUA molecular analysis all had significantly elevated levels of DS and HS compared to those with confirmed pseudodeficiency and/or heterozygosity. Analysis of our testing population and correlation with molecular results identified few discrepant outcomes and uncovered no evidence of false-negative cases. We have demonstrated that blood spot GAGs analysis accurately discriminates between patients with confirmed MPS I and false-positive cases due to pseudodeficiency or heterozygosity and increases the specificity of newborn screening for MPS I.

5.
Am J Med Genet A ; 182(7): 1750-1753, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32275121

ABSTRACT

Newborn screening (NBS) is a well-established state-run public health program which has targeted the early identification of treatable diseases like classic galactosemia (CG) for over a decade. We describe the case of a symptomatic newborn with CG and an abnormal screen report, including positive DNA-based test, who still managed to fall through the cracks in a sub-optimally functioning NBS program, despite decades of screening experience. While much attention is paid to testing technology, this case illustrates basic minimum requirements a newborn screening program must fulfill to reliably identify and treat all affected individuals including minimum reporting requirements, case surveillance and a dedicated short-term follow-up program. In newborn screening, success is systematic.


Subject(s)
Galactosemias/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening , Public Health , Galactosemias/epidemiology , Galactosemias/genetics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn
6.
Mol Genet Metab Rep ; 15: 106-109, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30023298

ABSTRACT

Incidence for the branched-chain intoxication-type disorders, maple syrup urine disease, propionic acidemia and methlymalonic aciduria is dependent on the population screened. Here newborn screening results from three world regions, state screening laboratories in the United States, a region in Germany and Kuwait provides new incidence numbers. Maple syrup urine disease incidence in the United States was calculated to be 1: 220219, in South-West Germany 1: 119573 (Germany nationwide 1:177978), and in Kuwait 1: 59426. Incidence of propionic acidemia alone is calculated to be 1: 242741 in the United States, 1: 284450 in South-West Germany (Germany nationwide 1:202617) and 1:59426 in Kuwait. Incidence of isolated methylmalonic aciduria alone is 1:69354 in the United States, 1:568901 in South-West Germany (Germany nationwide 1:159199) and 1: 19809 in Kuwait. In the United States several newborn screening laboratories combine their results for propionic acidemia and methylmalonic aciduria, and also include combined remethylation disorders in the respective category, resulting in an incidence of 1:50709. Combined evaluation of methylmalonic aciduria, propionic aciduria and combined remethylation disorders results in a similar incidence for Germany of 1:67539. This evaluation of newborn screening incidences reflects some population differences for three intoxication-type metabolic disorders. However, different sample sizes of the populations screened over different time periods, and differences in case definitions for methylmalonic acidurias have to be considered when interpreting these data.

7.
Mol Genet Metab ; 122(4): 153-155, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102225

ABSTRACT

Hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA) is a disorder diagnosed only incidentally by newborn screening, a by-product of screening for classic phenylketonuria (PKU) which, if untreated, causes irreversible neurologic sequelae. In contrast, HPA is thought to have a benign phenotype because phenylalanine (Phe) levels are insufficiently elevated to cause neurological damage, obviating the need for rigorous dietary protein restriction. Phenylalanine below 360µmol/L is generally considered safe, thus this threshold is both the upper therapeutic range for treated PKU and the highest Phe expected to be possible for most individuals with HPA. However, the published literature and even expert consensus provides limited guidance on long-term follow-up of Phe after this diagnosis. In particular, how frequently and vigilantly to monitor levels to evaluate for subsequent elevations above the 'safe' range. Upon retrospective review we identified 22 patients with HPA, ascertained via newborn screen and currently aged two to thirty-six years. All patients had an initial untreated Phe between 90µmol/L (our upper limit of normal) and 360µmol/L. Of these patients, seven subsequently demonstrated either fluctuating or sustained increases in Phe above 360µmol/L. Five have been treated successfully with sapropterin therapy without dietary intervention and two have been treated with mild to moderate protein restriction. Our experience demonstrates successful treatment of these children without the traditional highly restrictive PKU diet. However, a better understanding of this disorder is necessary to more safely and appropriately identify, monitor and manage children with HPA. SYNOPSIS: One clinics' experience with diagnostic differences in a population of Hyperphenylalaninemia patients that required treatment.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Screening , Phenylalanine/blood , Phenylketonurias/diet therapy , Phenylketonurias/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Biopterins/administration & dosage , Biopterins/analogs & derivatives , Biopterins/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Diet, Protein-Restricted , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Phenotype , Phenylalanine/metabolism , Phenylketonurias/diagnosis , Phenylketonurias/genetics , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
Mol Genet Metab Rep ; 13: 9-12, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28748147

ABSTRACT

Methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) I/III deficiency is an inborn error of metabolism caused by mutations in MAT1A, encoding the catalytic subunit of MAT responsible for the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine, and is characterized by persistent hypermethioninemia. While historically considered a recessive disorder, a milder autosomal dominant form of MAT I/III deficiency occurs, though only the most common mutation p.Arg264His has ample evidence to prove dominant inheritance. We report a case of hypermethioninemia caused by the p.Ala259Val substitution and provide evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance by showing both maternal inheritance of the mutation and concomitant hypermethioninemia. The p.Ala259Val mutation falls in the dimer interface, and thus likely leads to dominant inheritance by a similar mechanism to that described in the previously reported dominant negative mutation, that is, by means of interference with subunits encoded by the wild-type allele.

9.
Mol Genet Metab ; 116(4): 226-30, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26549574

ABSTRACT

For most inherited metabolic disorders on newborn screening (NBS) panels, prompt, expert confirmation and treatment are critical to optimize clinical outcomes for children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMD). In the Washington Metropolitan Area (WMA), 3 different short-term follow-up (STFU) systems exist for linking infants with positive newborn screens for IMD to appropriate specialty care. We diagrammed the STFU systems for the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia and calculated clinically relevant intervals of time between NBS collection and diagnosis/treatment initiation. We also surveyed representatives from 48 other state NBS programs to classify the STFU systems in the rest of the country. We found that in the WMA the STFU system that did not include the IMD specialist at the same time as the primary care provider (PCP) was associated with a longer median collection-to-specialist contact interval for true positive NBS for critical diagnoses (p=0.013). Nationally, 25% of state NBS programs report having a STFU system that does not include the IMD specialist at the same time as the PCP. In conclusion, there is variability among the STFU systems employed by NBS programs in the US which may lead to delays in diagnosis confirmation and treatment. National standards for STFU systems that include early involvement of an IMD specialist for all presumed positive NBS results may decrease the collection-to-specialist contact interval which could improve clinical outcomes in children with IMD.


Subject(s)
Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , District of Columbia , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Maryland , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/genetics , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/therapy , Physicians, Primary Care/organization & administration , Virginia
10.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 15(4): 241-7; quiz E1-2, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26225592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) are individually rare but collectively common disorders that frequently require rapid or urgent therapy. PURPOSE: This article provides a generalized approach to IMDs, as well as some investigations and safe therapies that may be initiated pending the metabolic consult. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: An overview of the research supporting management strategies is provided. In addition, the newborn metabolic screen is reviewed. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Caring for infants with IMDs can seem difficult because each of the types is rarely seen; however, collectively the management can be seen as similar. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: When an IMD is suspected, a metabolic specialist should be consulted for expert advice regarding appropriate laboratory investigations and management. Because rapid intervention of IMDs before the onset of symptoms may prevent future irreversible sequelae, each abnormal newborn screen must be addressed promptly. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Management can be difficult. Research in this area is limited and can be difficult without multisite coordination since sample sizes of any significance are difficult to achieve.


Subject(s)
Metabolism, Inborn Errors , Neonatal Screening , Autopsy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/diagnosis , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/nursing , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/therapy , Neonatal Screening/methods , Neonatal Screening/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...