The origin of endodontic Enterococcus faecalis explored by comparison of virulence factor patterns and antibiotic resistance to that of isolates from stool samples, blood cultures and food.

AIM: To elucidate the origin of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from secondary root canal infections and the possibility for a foodborne transmission by comparing them to strains recovered from food, blood and stool regarding putative virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility profiles, where strains from common origin were hypothesized to harbour similar characteristics. METHODOLOGY: A total of 108 E. faecalis strains recovered in the county of Stockholm, Sweden, were screened using PCR for putative virulence factors esp, cylA, gelE/gelatinase-negative phenotype (ef1841/fsrC), efaA, ace and asa1. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ampicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin and linezolid was determined using the agar dilution method. RESULTS: Next to strains from blood, the food isolates presented the highest average number of virulence determinants and were frequently enriched with asa1 coding for aggregation substance. None of the endodontic strains carried cylA, and the gelatinase-negative phenotype caused by a deletion dominated the group. Altogether, the most prevalent genes were gelE, efaA and ace, and a combination of them was equally present in approximately 80% of the strains from food, stool and root canals in comparison with 43.3% of the blood isolates. High-level resistance to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin was observed in 30% of the blood isolates, whereas the isolates from other origins, with single exceptions, were susceptible to all tested antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for a foodborne transmission, explaining the high reported prevalence of E. faecalis in root filled teeth, could not be determined based on the similarities in virulence factor patterns and antibiotic susceptibility. The only linkage between isolates from food and root canals consisted of a shared common combination of the genes gelE, efaA and ace. The high occurrence of putative virulence traits in food isolates questions the safety of E. faecalis in food products.

Potential for nosocomial transmission of Enterococcus faecalis from surfaces in dental operatories.

AIM: To assess the potential for nosocomial transmission of Enterococcus faecalis during root canal treatment by measuring its occurrence on surfaces in dental operatories in relation to the efficacy of disinfection routines. METHODOLOGY: Eight dental clinics (two endodontic specialist clinics and six general dentistry clinics) were included. Bacterial sampling was conducted in duplicate after root canal treatment and collected before and after disinfection from four surfaces expected to be frequently disinfected and six surfaces expected to be occasionally disinfected. RESULTS: A total of 320 samples were collected. Overall, 40.6% (n = 130) exhibited bacterial growth, mostly consisting of environmental bacteria (36.3%) and to a lesser extent of bacteria from salivary contamination (3.4%). Only three surfaces, all of which were probably seldomly disinfected, were positive for E. faecalis (0.9%). Disinfection routines resulted in an increased contamination in the majority of general dentistry clinics: 64% (32/50) of the surfaces were contaminated prior to and 70% (35/50) after disinfection. Conversely, disinfection of surfaces in the specialist clinics reduced contamination levels by 10%. CONCLUSIONS: The origin of E. faecalis in secondary root canal infections remains unclear, as the potential for nosocomial transmission of enterococci from environmental surfaces in dental surgeries appears to be very small. The incorrect or ineffective disinfection procedures in general dentistry clinics needs to be addressed to counteract the risk for bacterial transmission in dental operatories.

Enterococcus faecalis infection in root canals - host-derived or exogenous source?

AIMS: Enterococcus faecalis is associated with a significant number of refractory endodontic infections. Previous studies report a prevalence of Ent. faecalis ranging from 24% up to 77% in teeth with failed endodontic treatment. The origin of the micro-organism remains unclear, as enterococci do not belong to the normal oral microflora. The aim of this study was to determine whether these enterococci were of endogenous or exogenous origin. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with apical periodontitis in need of endodontic orthograde re-treatment were included. Samples were collected from root canals, saliva and faeces and subjected to microbiological culturing. The genetic relationship between Ent. faecalis from root canals and isolates from the different host sources was determined using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In 16% (8/50) of the patients, enterococci were collected from the root canal samples. The genetic analysis showed that the isolates from the root canals were not related to those from the normal gastrointestinal microflora. None of these patients had enterococci in their saliva samples. CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic infections with Ent. faecalis are probably not derived from the patient's own normal microflora, which indicates that these infections ent. faecalis are of exogenous origin. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first study to genetically compare endodontic infectious Ent. faecalis isolates with isolates from the hosts' own normal microflora.