Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Genet ; 89(5): 630-5, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582393

ABSTRACT

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is commonly used in diagnosing patients with intellectual disability (ID) with or without congenital malformation. Because aCGH interrogates with the whole genome, there is a risk of being confronted with incidental findings (IF). In order to anticipate the ethical issues of IF with the generalization of new genome-wide analysis technologies, we questioned French clinicians and cytogeneticists about the situations they have faced regarding IF from aCGH. Sixty-five IF were reported. Forty corresponded to autosomal dominant diseases with incomplete penetrance, 7 to autosomal dominant diseases with complete penetrance, 14 to X-linked diseases, and 4 were heterozygotes for autosomal recessive diseases with a high prevalence of heterozygotes in the population. Therapeutic/preventive measures or genetic counselling could be argued for all cases except four. These four IF were intentionally not returned to the patients. Clinicians reported difficulties in returning the results in 29% of the cases, mainly when the question of IF had not been anticipated. Indeed, at the time of the investigation, only 48% of the clinicians used consents mentioning the risk of IF. With the emergence of new technologies, there is a need to report such national experiences; they show the importance of pre-test information on IF.


Subject(s)
Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , Genetic Counseling/ethics , Genetic Counseling/methods , Incidental Findings , Disclosure/ethics , Female , France , Genes, Dominant/genetics , Genes, Recessive/genetics , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/diagnosis , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/genetics , Humans , Male , Microarray Analysis/methods , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 34(12): 1133-8, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24961405

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to report pregnancy outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome (TS) and to compare and assess termination of pregnancy rates during two periods. The intervals selected were before and after 1997 when multidisciplinary centers for prenatal diagnosis (MCPDs) were established in France. METHODS: A database of 975 cases of TS diagnosed between 1980 and 2012 was created from 21 French cytogenetics laboratories. For each case, the karyotype indication, maternal age, year of prenatal testing, sampling procedure, karyotype, associated ultrasound findings, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Karyotypes were mainly performed because of abnormal sonographic findings (84%). Before 1997, there were no changes in the rate of termination (90%) of affected fetuses. After 1997, the rate fell to 80%. This decrease was mainly observed in cases of mosaicism, incidental diagnosis, and in later gestations. US abnormalities were more likely to be associated with a full 45,X karyotype. CONCLUSION: There was an evolution in the way genetic counseling was performed following prenatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome that coincided with the opening of MCPDs in France. This resulted in a decrease in the rate of termination of affected fetuses.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Turner Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , France/epidemiology , Genetic Counseling/organization & administration , Humans , Karyotyping/statistics & numerical data , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies
3.
Clin Genet ; 85(3): 233-44, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23489061

ABSTRACT

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be characterized by karyotype. In many prenatal cases of de novo sSMC, the outcome of pregnancy is difficult to predict because the euchromatin content is unclear. This study aimed to determine the presence or absence of euchromatin material of 39 de novo prenatally ascertained sSMC by array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Cases were prospectively ascertained from the study of 65,000 prenatal samples [0.060%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.042-0.082]. Array-CGH showed that 22 markers were derived from non-acrocentric markers (56.4%) and 7 from acrocentic markers (18%). The 10 additional cases remained unidentified (25.6%), but 7 of 10 could be further identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization; 69% of de novo sSMC contained euchromatin material, 95.4% of which for non-acrocentric markers. Some sSMC containing euchromatin had a normal phenotype (31% for non-acrocentric and 75% for acrocentric markers). Statistical differences between normal and abnormal phenotypes were shown for the size of the euchromatin material (more or less than 1 Mb, p = 0.0006) and number of genes (more or less than 10, p = 0.0009). This study is the largest to date and shows the utility of array-CGH or SNP array in the detection and characterization of de novo sSMC in a prenatal context.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Prognosis , Adult , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Female , France , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Markers , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Karyotype , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Risk , Switzerland , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...