Impact of pre-hospital antibiotic therapy on mortality in invasive meningococcal disease: a propensity score study.

The role of pre-hospital antibiotic therapy in invasive meningococcal diseases remains unclear with contradictory data. The aim was to determine this role in the outcome of invasive meningococcal disease. Observational cohort study of patients with/without pre-hospital antibiotic therapy in invasive meningococcal disease attended at the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Barcelona) during the period 1977-2013. Univariate and multivariate analyses of mortality, corrected by propensity score used as a covariate to adjust for potential confounding, were performed. Patients with pre-hospital antibiotic therapy were also analyzed according to whether they had received oral (group A) or parenteral antibiotics (early therapy) (group B). Five hundred twenty-seven cases of invasive meningococcal disease were recorded and 125 (24%) of them received pre-hospital antibiotic therapy. Shock and age were the risk factors independently related to mortality. Mortality differed between patients with/without pre-hospital antibiotic therapy (0.8% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Pre-hospital antibiotic therapy seemed to be a protective factor in the multivariate analysis of mortality (p = 0.038; OR, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.013-0.882). However, it was no longer protective when the propensity score was included in the analysis (p = 0.103; OR, 0.173; 95% CI, 0.021-1.423). Analysis of the oral and parenteral pre-hospital antibiotic groups revealed that there were no deaths in early therapy group. Patients able to receive oral antibiotics had less severe symptoms than those who did not receive pre-hospital antibiotics. Age and shock were the factors independently related to mortality. Early parenteral therapy was not associated with death. Oral antibiotic therapy in patients able to take it was associated with a beneficial effect in the prognosis of invasive meningococcal disease.

Management of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Infections in Adults: Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Treatment Failure.

Background: Little is known regarding the optimal treatment of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt infections in adults. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of treatment strategies and to identify factors that predict failure. Methods: Retrospective, observational study of patients aged ≥12 years with VP shunt infections (1980 -2014). Therapeutic approaches were classified under 4 headings: only antibiotics (OA), one-stage shunt replacement (OSSR), two-stage shunt replacement (TSSR), and shunt removal without replacement (SR). The primary endpoint was failure of the treatment strategy, defined as the absence of definite cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sterilization or related mortality. The parameters that predicted failure were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Of 108 episodes (51% male, median age 50 years), 86 were analyzed. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for a median of 19 days. Eighty episodes were treated using strategies that combined antibiotic and surgical treatment (37 TSSR, 24 SR, 19 OSSR) and 6 with OA. Failure occurred in 30% of episodes, mostly due to lack of CSF sterilization in OSSR and OA groups. Twelve percent died of related causes and 10% presented superinfection of the CSF temporary drainage/externalized peritoneal catheter. TSSR was the most effective strategy when VP shunt replacement was attempted. The only independent risk factor that predicted failure was retention of the VP shunt, regardless of the strategy. Conclusions: This is the largest series of VP shunt infections in adults reported to date. VP shunt removal, particularly TSSR when the patient is shunt dependent, remains the optimal choice of treatment and does not increase morbidity.

Characteristics of meningitis caused by Ibuprofen: report of 2 cases with recurrent episodes and review of the literature.

Ibuprofen is a common nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug that is the most frequent cause of aseptic meningitis induced by drugs. The incidence of this type of aseptic meningitis is increasing, mainly among patients with underlying autoimmune connective tissue disorder, but also among healthy people. We report 2 patients with recurrent meningitis caused by ibuprofen mimicking bacterial meningitis: the first patient a woman with dermatomyositis and the second patient a previously healthy woman who developed autoimmune thyroiditis a few months later. We then review 71 episodes of ibuprofen-related meningitis in 36 patients reported in the literature. Twenty-two patients (61%) presented with an autoimmune connective tissue disorder, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus, and 22 (61%) had recurrent episodes. Most episodes consisted of an acute meningeal syndrome with a predominance of neutrophils in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in 72.2% of episodes and elevated protein in the CSF, so the clinical presentation of this type of aseptic meningitis may be quite similar to that of acute bacterial meningitis. CSF glucose levels are usually normal, which may help to differentiate between these 2 types of meningitis. In some cases the clinical presentation is that of meningoencephalitis with neurologic focal deficits. Although based on the close relation between the administration of ibuprofen and the onset of symptoms, especially if previous episodes have occurred, the diagnosis of ibuprofen-induced aseptic meningitis is a diagnosis by exclusion. If the clinical picture is compatible with bacterial meningitis, empirical antibiotic therapy must be administered until negativity of cultures and other microbiologic tests is determined. Rechallenge to ibuprofen reproduces the symptoms and confirms the diagnosis, but is usually not advised. Whatever the clinical presentation, physicians must consider the possibility of ibuprofen-related meningitis or meningoencephalitis in patients taking ibuprofen, especially if they are suffering from an autoimmune connective tissue disorder. On the other hand, we think it would be appropriate to screen for autoimmune disease in previously healthy patients diagnosed with ibuprofen-related meningitis or meningoencephalitis. Finally, we propose that meningitis due to ibuprofen be included in the list of causes of recurrent aseptic meningitis.

Evaluation of fosfomycin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin in an experimental model of meningitis caused by two strains of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To study the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of fosfomycin, alone and in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin, against two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae: HUB 2349 (fosfomycin and ceftriaxone, MICs 16 and 2 mg/L) and ATCC 51916 (MICs 4 and 32 mg/L). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics data were collected from the study of eight infected animals after a single intravenous dose of 300 mg/kg of fosfomycin. Time-kill curves were plotted using CSF antibiotic concentrations achievable clinically. In the rabbit model, we studied the efficacy and effects on inflammation of treatment with fosfomycin 1200 mg/kg/day, ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day and vancomycin 30 mg/kg/day, over 26 h. RESULTS: Fosfomycin peak level in serum was 324.48 +/- 102.1 mg/L at 0.5 h; CSF penetration was 49.2%. Time-kill curves showed that fosfomycin was bactericidal against the ATCC 51916 strain and that the addition of fosfomycin to ceftriaxone or vancomycin was synergic against the HUB 2349 strain. Resistance to fosfomycin was detected both when fosfomycin was studied alone and in combination. In the rabbit model, fosfomycin showed bactericidal activity only against the ATCC 51916 strain. Combinations of fosfomycin with ceftriaxone or vancomycin were bactericidal against both strains; they improved efficacy and decreased CSF inflammatory parameters over monotherapies, without showing statistical differences in comparison with the combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin in combination with ceftriaxone or vancomycin appeared to be effective for the treatment of experimental cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. These combinations are possible alternatives in cases of allergy or intolerance to first-line drugs or in rare meningitis caused by highly cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci.