Imaging evaluation of nonobstetric conditions during pregnancy: what every radiologist should know.

In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of imaging examinations performed on pregnant patients. That increase has occurred across the various modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. However, little is known about the risks that these examinations generate for the mother and fetus, related to the use of ionizing radiation or the use of contrast media. When pregnant patients are submitted to imaging studies, the principles of protection established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection should always be respected, to avoid injury to the pregnant woman and the fetus. The potential deleterious effects on the fetus must be weighed against the damage caused by not performing an examination that is clearly indicated, given that a delayed or missed diagnosis can be even more harmful to the health of the mother and of the fetus itself. The purpose of this review article is to address concerns regarding the safety of imaging methods used during pregnancy, as well as to identify typical clinical situations that require decisions to be made about the indication and optimal planning of imaging examinations.

Nas últimas décadas observou-se um aumento expressivo no número de exames de imagem realizados em pacientes gestantes. Este aumento inclui diferentes modalidades, como a ultrassonografia, a tomografia computadorizada e a ressonância magnética. Entretanto, ainda se sabe pouco sobre os riscos que esses exames geram para o binômio mãe-feto, seja no contexto da utilização de radiação ionizante ou da utilização de diferentes meios de contraste. Ao se submeter pacientes grávidas a estudos por imagem, deve-se sempre respeitar os princípios de limitação do uso estabelecidos pela Comissão Internacional de Proteção Radiológica, visando a poupar a gestante e o feto de danos evitáveis. Ressalta-se que os potenciais efeitos deletérios sobre o feto se contrapõem aos danos causados pela não realização de um exame bem indicado, já que um diagnóstico protelado ou perdido pode ser ainda mais nocivo para a saúde materna e do próprio concepto. O objetivo deste artigo de revisão é esclarecer dúvidas sobre a segurança dos métodos de imagem durante o período gestacional, bem como identificar situações clínicas típicas que exigem decisões sobre a indicação e o planejamento otimizado dos exames de imagem.

Imaging evaluation of nonobstetric conditions during pregnancy: what every radiologist should know / Avaliação por imagem de condições não obstétricas na gestação: o que todo radiologista deve saber

Abstract In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of imaging examinations performed on pregnant patients. That increase has occurred across the various modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. However, little is known about the risks that these examinations generate for the mother and fetus, related to the use of ionizing radiation or the use of contrast media. When pregnant patients are submitted to imaging studies, the principles of protection established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection should always be respected, to avoid injury to the pregnant woman and the fetus. The potential deleterious effects on the fetus must be weighed against the damage caused by not performing an examination that is clearly indicated, given that a delayed or missed diagnosis can be even more harmful to the health of the mother and of the fetus itself. The purpose of this review article is to address concerns regarding the safety of imaging methods used during pregnancy, as well as to identify typical clinical situations that require decisions to be made about the indication and optimal planning of imaging examinations.

Resumo Nas últimas décadas observou-se um aumento expressivo no número de exames de imagem realizados em pacientes gestantes. Este aumento inclui diferentes modalidades, como a ultrassonografia, a tomografia computadorizada e a ressonância magnética. Entretanto, ainda se sabe pouco sobre os riscos que esses exames geram para o binômio mãe-feto, seja no contexto da utilização de radiação ionizante ou da utilização de diferentes meios de contraste. Ao se submeter pacientes grávidas a estudos por imagem, deve-se sempre respeitar os princípios de limitação do uso estabelecidos pela Comissão Internacional de Proteção Radiológica, visando a poupar a gestante e o feto de danos evitáveis. Ressalta-se que os potenciais efeitos deletérios sobre o feto se contrapõem aos danos causados pela não realização de um exame bem indicado, já que um diagnóstico protelado ou perdido pode ser ainda mais nocivo para a saúde materna e do próprio concepto. O objetivo deste artigo de revisão é esclarecer dúvidas sobre a segurança dos métodos de imagem durante o período gestacional, bem como identificar situações clínicas típicas que exigem decisões sobre a indicação e o planejamento otimizado dos exames de imagem.

Ultrasonography to assess body composition: Relevance of training.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of ultrasonography training by non-experts carrying out quadriceps muscle mass assessment. METHODS: Two non-expert evaluators were trained by two radiologists on the basic principles of ultrasonography and quadriceps muscle measurements. Afterward, they performed assessments on 30 healthy volunteers to determine interobserver agreement, considering two landmarks (two-thirds of the femoral distance, and 10 cm above the patella), which were tested by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In all, 342 measurements were acquired. Better ICC data were seen for the muscle at two-thirds (ICC = 0.74-0.86) of the landmark than at the 10-cm landmark (ICC = 0.63-0.91). However, the thickness measurements indicated inadequate agreement (ICC = 0.71). The ICC values for both the rectus femoris area and thickness progressively increased when comparing the first 10 measurements with the last 10 for the two-thirds landmark. For the 10-cm landmark, worse data were observed in the last measurements, perhaps due to the increased number of obese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements at the 10-cm landmark are more difficult to acquire, especially in the obese. Intensive training for non-expert examiners is mandatory.

Th1 and Th2-like protein balance in human inflammatory radicular cysts and periapical granulomas.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic dental periapical lesions result from chronic inflammation of periapical tissues caused by continuous antigenic stimulation from infected root canals. Recent findings have suggested that T helper (Th) 1 and Th2-like cytokines are important in the pathogenesis of chronic periapical inflammatory diseases. However, the mechanisms regulating these immunoinflammatory pathways have not been fully elucidated. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate interleukin (IL)-4, IL-12, and interferon γ (IFN-γ) protein levels in human radicular cysts and periapical granulomas. METHODS: Archived samples of cysts (n = 52) and granulomas (n = 27) were sectioned and submitted to immunohistochemistry to evaluate the tissue expression of IL-4, IL-12, and IFN-γ. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05). RESULTS: An increased expression of IFN-γ was observed in radicular cysts. IL-4 expression was stronger in periapical granulomas than in radicular cysts. IL-12 was not detected in any of the samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that IFN-γ protein levels are increased in radicular cysts, whereas IL-4 expression is stronger in samples of periapical granulomas. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the signaling pathways mediated by these cytokines and to facilitate the development of more effective periapical disease management strategies.

High HIF-1α expression genotypes in oral lichen planus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess whether C1772T and G1790A hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1)α polymorphisms are associated with risk of oral lichen planus (OLP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was used to investigate HIF-1α C1779T and G1790A polymorphisms in 32 OLP and 88 individuals without OLP. RESULTS: The frequency of the CC, TT, GA, and AA genotypes was higher in patients with OLP. Notably, individuals carrying the C and A, and T and A haplotypes showed a significant association OLP risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the C1772T and G1790A polymorphisms of HIF-1α gene increased the risk of OLP. C1772T and G1790A polymorphisms of HIF-1α gene had differing patterns of allelic imbalance in the normal samples and subsequent chronic lesions. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the HIF-1α pathway in OLP, which would facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of OLP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results, in conjunction with previous studies, suggest that HIF-1α may play important roles in the chronicity of oral mucosa lesions of OLP patients. Taken together, we suggest that HIF-1α polymorphisms enhance its target genes, thereby altering the microenvironment and supporting sequential release of inflammatory mediators or cellular events in OLP. It appears unlikely that inhibition of a single proinflammatory mediator will prove useful in clinical practice, but several ways to reprogram mediators engaged in a wide array of roles simultaneously are encouraging.