Autonomic nervous system involvement in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

In autoimmune neurological diseases, the autonomic nervous system can be the primary target of autoimmunity (e.g. autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy), or, more frequently, be damaged together with other areas of the nervous system (e.g. Guillain-Barré syndrome). Patients with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) often develop dysautonomia; however, the frequency and spectrum of autonomic signs and symptoms remain ill defined except for those scenarios in which dysautonomia is a core feature of the disease. Such is the case of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Morvan syndrome or anti-NMDAR encephalitis; in the latter, patients with dysautonomia have been reported to carry a more severe disease and to retain higher disability than those without autonomic dysfunction. Likewise, the presence of autonomic involvement indicates a higher risk of death due to neurological cause in patients with anti-Hu PNS. However, in anti-Hu and other PNS, as well as in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors' toxicities, the characterization of autonomic involvement is frequently overshadowed by the severity of other neurological symptoms and signs. When evaluated with tests specific for autonomic function, patients with autoimmune encephalitis or PNS usually show a more widespread autonomic involvement than clinically suggested, which may reflect a potential gap of care when it comes to diagnosing dysautonomia. This review aims to revise the autonomic involvement in patients with autoimmune encephalitis and PNS, using for that purpose an antibody-based approach. We also discuss and provide general recommendations for the evaluation and management of dysautonomia in these patients.

Paraneoplastic encephalitis: clinically based approach on diagnosis and management.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNSs) comprise a subset of immune-mediated nervous system diseases triggered by an underlying malignancy. Each syndrome usually shows a distinct clinical presentation and outcome according to the associated neural antibodies. PNSs generally have a subacute onset with rapid progression and severe neurological disability. However, some patients may have hyperacute onset or even show chronic progression mimicking neurodegenerative diseases. Updated diagnostic criteria for PNS have been recently established in order to increase diagnostic specificity and to encourage standardisation of research initiatives related to PNS. Treatment for PNS includes oncological therapy and immunomodulation to halt neurological deterioration although current treatment options are seldom effective in reversing disability. Nevertheless, growing knowledge and better understanding of PNS pathogenesis promise better recognition, earlier diagnosis and novel treatment strategies. Considering that PNSs provide a model of effective anticancer immunity, the impact of these studies will extend far beyond the field of neurology.

Paraneoplastic encephalitis: clinically based approach on diagnosis and management.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNSs) comprise a subset of immune-mediated nervous system diseases triggered by an underlying malignancy. Each syndrome usually shows a distinct clinical presentation and outcome according to the associated neural antibodies. PNSs generally have a subacute onset with rapid progression and severe neurological disability. However, some patients may have hyperacute onset or even show chronic progression mimicking neurodegenerative diseases. Updated diagnostic criteria for PNS have been recently established in order to increase diagnostic specificity and to encourage standardisation of research initiatives related to PNS. Treatment for PNS includes oncological therapy and immunomodulation to halt neurological deterioration although current treatment options are seldom effective in reversing disability. Nevertheless, growing knowledge and better understanding of PNS pathogenesis promise better recognition, earlier diagnosis and novel treatment strategies. Considering that PNSs provide a model of effective anticancer immunity, the impact of these studies will extend far beyond the field of neurology.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: An update of clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has represented a major advance in cancer treatment. By enhancing endogenous immune responses to destroy cancer cells, ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with possible involvement of any organ system. IrAEs are frequent, particularly those involving the skin or the endocrine system, and usually completely reversible after temporary immunosuppression, while neurological irAEs (n-irAEs) are relatively rare, often severe, and they carry a considerable risk of mortality and long-term disability. They usually affect the peripheral nervous system, mainly manifesting as myositis, polyradiculoneuropathy, or cranial neuropathy, and, less frequently, involve the central nervous system, causing encephalitis, meningitis, or myelitis. Although somehow reminiscent of the disorders that neurologists are familiar to deal with in their daily practice, n-irAEs are characterized by distinctive features from their idiopathic counterparts; for instance, myositis may have a predominant oculo-bulbar involvement reminiscent of myasthenia gravis and frequently associates with myocarditis; peripheral neuropathy, although often resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome, usually responds to corticosteroids. Remarkably, several associations between the neurological phenotype and the type of ICIs or the type of cancer have emerged in the last few years, and the growing administration of ICIs in patients with neuroendocrine cancers has led to an increased number of reports of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (triggered or worsened by ICIs). This review aims to update current knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of n-irAEs. We also discuss the essential parts of the diagnostic approach, and we provide general recommendations for the management of these disorders.

Neurotoxicity and safety of the rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a growing issue in neuro-oncology practice.

Neurological, immune-related adverse events (n-irAE) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a growing clinical problem in neuro-oncology practice. Although rare, the frequency of n-irAEs will increase as ICI use becomes more common. Central and peripheral nervous systems may be involved, and multiple n-irAEs like myositis, myasthenia gravis, and myocarditis can arise in the same patient. Prompt recognition, initial ICI discontinuation, and treatment with immunosuppressive therapy comprise key aspects of managing these potentially fatal neurological complications. Severe and/or treatment-refractory n-irAEs may occur and require individualized care. In the same vein, a possible reintroduction of ICI after a n-irAE represents an additional challenge in clinical practice. An approach by experienced neurologists involved in highly subspecialized, multidisciplinary care teams is, therefore, of major importance in managing these cases. The present study updates current knowledge regarding presentation forms, diagnostic workflows, outcomes, and general management of n-irAEs. With the aim to guide neurologists in decision-making processes during such scenarios, the study further reviews available data on ICI reintroduction safety in patients with prior n-irAEs.