TIPS for the management of stomal variceal bleeding due to cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension (PH) is associated with the development of esophageal or gastric varices, which can cause bleedings with high mortality. Varices can also manifest at sites of stomata. These parastomal varices can cause recurrent variceal bleedings (VB) despite local therapies. We present a case series of parastomal VB due to PH that were managed with implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients (pt) from 2 tertiary medical centers with parastomal VB between January 2014 and February 2020 who underwent the TIPS procedure. RESULTS: Nine pt were included. Seven pt had liver cirrhosis, mostly alcohol-related. Two pt had non-cirrhotic PH due to porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSD). Four pt had a colostomy, 1 an ileostomy, and 4 an ileal conduit. Malignancy was the leading cause of stoma surgery. All 9 pt suffered from recurrent parastomal VB despite non-selective beta-blocker and/or local therapy (e.g., compression, coagulation, suture ligation, or surgical stoma revision). All pt received TIPS implantation. In 7 pt, TIPS implantation led to sustainable hemostasis. Two pt suffered a bleeding relapse that was attributable to TIPS dysfunction. TIPS revision with coil embolization of the varices terminated the VB sustainably in both pt. CONCLUSIONS: In pt presenting with recurrent stomal bleedings, parastomal varices as a rare complication of PH must be taken into consideration as an underlying cause. In our case series, we managed to sustainably cease parastomal VB by TIPS implantation with or without coil embolization of the ectopic varices.

[Incidental finding of an intestinally differentiated adenocarcinoma in a tailgut cyst after robotic-assisted resection]. / Zufallsbefund eines intestinal differenzierten Adenokarzinoms in einer Tailgut Zyste nach robotisch-assistierter Resektion.

Due to pelvic symptoms, a diagnostic sectional imaging was initiated in a 52-year-old female patient. This revealed a cystic, retrorectal mass, suspected to be a tailgut cyst. Due to the symptoms and the unclear dignity after several frustrating endosonographic punctures, a robotic-assisted resection of the cystic Tumor was performed after careful interdisciplinary consultation.The histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a tailgut cyst but also revealed parts of an intestinally differentiated adenocarcinoma.Due to the unclear metastatic behaviour, robotic-assisted low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision was performed as oncological resection, similar to rectal carcinomas. No residuals or lymph node metastases were detectable in the histological examination, so that follow- up monitoring was recommended.Retrorectal tumours are an extremely rare entity, worldwide only 28 cases of an intestinally differentiated carcinoma in a tailgut cyst have been described so far. Since there are no clear recommendations in the literature regarding the diagnostic or therapeutic procedure, we would like to discuss a possible algorithm in case of a proven retrorectal mass in our case study.

[Treatment of HPV-associated Anal Lesions in HIV-positive Patients - Comparison of Surgical Treatment and Topical Therapy with Imiquimod]. / Behandlung HPV-assoziierter analer Läsionen bei HIV-positiven Patienten ­ chirurgische Abtragung vs. topische Therapie mit Imiquimod.

OBJECTIVES: In HIV+-patients, routine proctological assessment is warranted due to the high incidence of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection-related anogenital lesions, such as Condylomata acuminata (C. ac.), anal intraepithelial dysplasia (AIN) and anal cancer. For C. ac. and AIN, surgical resection and topical therapy with imiquimod have been discussed as treatment options. BACKGROUND: In this study, we contrasted surgical resection and topical imiquimod therapy of HPV-associated anal lesions in HIV+-patients, with a focus on healing rates and clinical outcome. We also analysed whether a synergistic treatment effect was detectable. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 97 HIV+ patients who underwent proctological evaluation and treatment over a 10-year period (11/2004 - 11/2015) at our centre. Initial success of surgical treatment, topical imiquimod therapy and the combination of the two strategies were compared. RESULTS: In 53/97 patients (54%), HPV-associated anal disease was diagnosed upon the first visit. In approx. 50% of the patients, the HIV infection was adequately controlled (52 patients with viral load < 40 copies [53.6%]) under cART. The mean age was 41.0 ± 11.6 years. In 7/53 patients with macroscopic C. ac., low-grade and in 18/53 patients high-grade AIN were additionally confirmed. Success rates of surgical resection, imiquimod treatment and the combination of the two were compared. Complete remission of C. ac. and AIN four weeks after treatment was considered a therapeutic success. For C. ac., success rates with imiquimod were 5/25 (20.0%) vs. surgery* 30/57 (52.6%, Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.05) vs. surgery+imiquimod 7/15 (46.7%). For AIN, success rates with imiquimod were 4/24 (16.7%) vs. surgery* 47/83 (56.7%, Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.05) vs. surgery+imiquimod 9/21 (42.8%). In 7/92 (13%) of surgical treatments, complications were reported: four minor and two significant bleeding episodes and one perianal thrombosis. No side effects of imiquimod were documented besides skin irritation. CONCLUSION: Surgery is more effective than topical imiquimod as initial therapy of HPV-related anogenital disease in HIV+-patients. A synergistic effect could not be demonstrated. On this basis, we recommend surgical treatment of C. ac. and AIN in HIV+-patients as first line treatment.

[Have Multimodal and Perioperative Therapeutic Strategies Changed the Survival after Oncological Oesophageal Surgery in the Last Two Decades? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis over 23 Years]. / Haben multimodale und perioperative Therapiestrategien das Überleben nach onkologischer Ösophaguschirurgie in den letzten 2 Dekaden verändert? Eine retrospektive Kohortenanalyse über 23 Jahre.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal malignoma is among the most frequent causes for cancer-related deaths. The only definite curative therapy is esophagectomy embedded in various multimodal treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term development after esophageal surgery in the last two decades in order to observe possible trends and their influence on short, medium and long term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cases of 301 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1989 and 2012 were analysed retrospectively. To investigate possible changes in perioperative management and their influence on prognosis patients were divided into two cohorts (A: surgery between 1989 and 2000; B: surgery between 2001 and 2012) and further analyzed with regard to demographics, tumor entity, stage, complications and survival. Statistics were conducted to compare both groups while p ≤ 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: In cohort B patients were significantly older compared to cohort A and underwent surgery in earlier tumor stages with a higher lymphnode yield. Also an increased incidence of adenocarcinoma was observed. While overall morbidity did not change significantly, a decreased rate of anastomotic leakage was observed in cohort B (5.5%) compared to cohort A (12.3%) accompanied by a simultaneous increase in cardiac events (A: 3.6% vs. B: 12.3%). Overall 30-days-mortality was 2.7% and decreased significantly from 5% in cohort A to 0.7% in cohort B (p = 0.05). Median survival was 46 ± 7 month in cohort A, in cohort B an increase could be observed (53 ± 7 months, p = 0.03). By univariate analysis we could demonstrate that stage, affected lymph nodes, lymphnode ratio (LNR) and incidence of postoperative complications were significant predictors for the survival whereas in multivariate analysis T-stage, R-status and LNR were independent predictors for patients outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing esophageal resection for cancer nowadays are older than in the past decades. Earlier cancer diagnosis, more radical surgical techniques with an extended lymphnode dissection, a decrease in anastomotic leakage and an improved perioperative care seem to compensate for this potential demographic disadvantage. The most important independent predictor of outcome after esophageal resection is the LNR.

Value and risk of laparoscopic surgery in hemophiliacs-experiences from a tertiary referral center for hemorrhagic diatheses.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is gaining popularity worldwide because of benefits like faster recovery, earlier hospital discharge, and better cosmetic results. In hemophiliacs, surgery in general harbors an increased risk for severe complications. Whether LS or conventional surgery (CS) should be recommended in these patients is controversial and therefore the issue of our present study. METHODS: We performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis including laparoscopically operated non-hemophiliacs (LONH), laparoscopically operated hemophiliacs (LOH), and conventionally operated hemophiliacs (COH) concerning duration of surgery, drainages, hospital stay, complications, factor use (VIII, IX, and X), and blood values. Mann-Whitney U test was used (significance level P = 0.05). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in duration of surgery and drains in laparoscopically or conventionally operated hemophiliacs versus matched pairs. Complication rate did not differ among the different groups. Concerning the total duration of hospital stay (t-DHOS) and the postoperative duration of hospital stay (p-DHOS), there was no statistical difference between LOH versus matched LONH. However, in COH versus matched LOH, a longer time was required for preparation and recovery (t-DHOS, P = 0.04; p-DHOS, P < 0.001). Also, the median factor supply perioperatively including the day of surgery did not differ between laparoscopically versus conventionally operated hemophiliacs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the safety and benefits of laparoscopic procedures in hemophiliacs by showing a significantly shorter hospital stay for these patients resulting in reduced therapeutic costs and a faster mobilization. Still, the surgical and perioperative management of hemophiliacs continues to be a challenge requiring an experienced interdisciplinary team.