Assessment of x-ray efficacy for intraoperative microneedle retrieval using a cadaveric model.

INTRODUCTION: Institutional protocols often mandate the use of x-rays when a microneedle is lost intraoperatively. Although x-rays can reliably show a macroneedle, the benefit of x-rays in detecting microneedles in human tissues has not been established as available data on this topic are investigated in anthropometric models. The current study aims to evaluate whether x-rays can reliably detect retained microneedles in a human cadaveric model. We hypothesize that microneedles would be detected at a significantly lower rate than macroneedles by x-ray in human tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Needles ranging from 4-0 to 10-0 were placed randomly throughout a cadaveric hand and foot. Each tissue sample was x-rayed using a Fexitron X-Ray machine, taking both anteroposterior and lateral views. A total of six x-ray images were then evaluated by 11 radiologists, independently. The radiologists circled over the area where they visualized a needle. The accuracy of detecting macroneedles (size 4-0 to 7-0) was compared with that of microneedles (size 8-0 to 10-0) using a chi-square test. RESULTS: The overall detection rate for the microneedles was significantly lower than the detection rate for macroneedles (13.5% vs 88.8%, p < .01). When subcategorized between the hand and the foot, the detection rate for microneedles was also significantly lower than the rate for macroneedles (hand: 7.6% for microneedles, 93.2% for macroneedles, p < .01; foot: 19.5% for microneedles, 84.4% for macroneedles, p < .01). The detection rate, in general, significantly decreased as the sizes of needles became smaller (7-0:70.5%, 8-0:18.2%, 9-0:16.7%, 10-0:2.3%, p < .01). CONCLUSION: X-rays, while useful in detecting macroneedles, had a significantly lower rate of detecting microneedles in a cadaveric model. The routine use of x-rays for a lost microneedle may not be beneficial. Further investigation with fresh tissue and similar intraoperative x-ray systems is warranted to corroborate and support these findings.

The Association between Mode of Transportation Support and Research Study Visit Attendance among Pregnant Patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between transportation assistance and study visits, and explore differences by transportation modality. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of prospective cohort study. We identified patients requesting transportation support for research ultrasound visits and identified controls (1:2 ratio) who did not request support matched for age, race, and insurance type. Conditional logistic regression examined the association between transportation support and mode of transportation with study visit attendance. RESULTS: Transportation support was requested by 57/1,184 (4.8%) participants. Participants that requested transportation support were three times more likely to attend visits than their matched controls (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.76-5.68). Among visits with transportation support, those supported by a ridesharing service had five-fold higher odds of attendance than visits supported with taxi service (aOR = 5.06, 95% CI: 1.50-16.98). CONCLUSION: Transportation support, especially a ridesharing service, is associated with improved attendance at research study visits in a sample of predominantly low-income, Black, pregnant participants. Implementing transportation support may be a promising strategy to improve engagement in research studies. KEY POINTS: · Participants utilizing transportation assistance were more likely to attend study appointments.. · Participants using ridesharing had higher likelihood of attendance than those using taxi service.. · Transportation assistance may improve research engagement for historically marginalized people..

Operation Diversify Plastic Surgery: An Innovative Strategy to Increase Diversity in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Healthcare disparities remain a significant problem facing the US healthcare system with recent evidence of persistent racial and ethnic disparities especially among patients from minority backgrounds. Recent studies have documented advantages to a racially and ethnically diverse surgical workforce such as higher patient satisfaction scores, superior patient compliance with physician recommendations, and increased participation in clinical research studies by minority patients. In plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS), there is a noted deficit among residents and faculty that come from ethnically underrepresented in medicine (URiM) backgrounds despite recent efforts to increase diversity in PRS surgeons. URiM medical students from three of the four historically Black medical universities organized to discuss pathways to PRS. Operation Diversify Plastic Surgery is a student-led organization that was developed to address the lack of diversity in PRS, challenges faced by students from institutions that lack PRS residency training programs, and unique factors that affect URiM students interested in PRS. Available studies note that mentoring relationships and research opportunities were instrumental in recruiting URiM students into PRS residency programs. Operation Diversify Plastic Surgery is an innovative solution to the insufficient URiM PRS residency candidate pool by increasing medical student exposure to PRS via educational lectures, virtual mentoring opportunities, and insights into research fellowships.