Fatigue Failure in Extra-Articular Proximal Tibia Fractures: Locking Intramedullary Nail Versus Double Locking Plates-A Biomechanical Study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to compare the fatigue strength of a locking intramedullary nail (LN) construct with a double locking plate (DLP) construct in comminuted proximal extra-articular tibia fractures. METHODS: Eight pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric tibias with low bone mineral density [age: 80 ± 7 (SD) years, T-score: -2.3 ± 1.2] were used. One tibia from each pair was fixed with LN, whereas the contralateral side was fixed with DLP for complex extra-articular multifragmentary metaphyseal fractures (simulating OTA 41-A3.3). Specimens were cyclically loaded under compression simulating single-leg stance by staircase method out to 260,000 cycles. Every 2500 cycles, localized gap displacements were measured with a 3D motion tracking system, and x-ray images of the proximal tibia were acquired. To allow for mechanical settling, initial metrics were calculated at 2500 cycles. The 2 groups were compared regarding initial construct stiffness, initial medial and lateral gap displacements, stiffness at 30,000 cycles, medial and lateral gap displacements at 30,000 cycles, failure load, number of cycles to failure, and failure mode. Failure metrics were reported for initial and catastrophic failures. RESULTS: DLP constructs exhibited higher initial stiffness and stiffness at 30,000 cycles compared with LN constructs (P < 0.03). There were no significant differences between groups for loads at failure or cycles to failure. CONCLUSIONS: For the fixation of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures, a LN provides a similar fatigue performance to double locked plates. The locked nail could be safely used for fixation of proximal tibia fractures with the advantage of limited extramedullary soft tissue damage.

Integrity of Damage Control Posterior Spinal Fusion Constructs for Patients With Polytrauma: A Biomechanical Investigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate spinal stability achieved with different levels of posterior percutaneous fixation (postPerc) for thoracolumbar fractures in cadavers subjected to ICU activities. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: "Spine damage control" involves postPerc performed within 24 hours of injury and staged, elective, definitive stabilization. Amount of instrumentation needed to initially achieve adequate spinal stability, minimize morbidity, and accommodate ICU care needs between stages are not defined. METHODS: In full-unembalmed cadavers motion-tracking sensors were placed at T11 and L1. A T12 corpectomy with PLC injury was stabilized with 1, 2, and 3 levels of PostPerc above/below the injury. Motions between T11 and L1 were measured during Log-Roll and Sit-Up on an ICU bed. After in situ testing, anatomic spinal motion ranges were determined under pure moment loads. RESULTS: 5 cadavers were evaluated. For Log-Roll, 2 and 3 levels above/below restored stability to intact, whereas 1 level above/below did not for axial rotation. For translation, all instrumentation restored stability to intact. During Sit-Up, a linear increase in flexion was observed. At 45° Sit-Up, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar to intact for flexion; 1 level above/below had significantly more flexion. All instrumentations restored translation to intact for Sit-Up; significantly more axial collapse occurred for instrumentation compared with intact. During ex situ testing, 2 and 3 levels above/below were similar; 1 level above/below had significantly greater laxity in flexion, extension, and axial rotation. CONCLUSION: Posterior instrumentation 2 or 3 levels above/below a severe thoracolumbar fracture model can restore spinal stability back to its intact condition. 2 levels of fixation above/below this "worst-case scenario" is minimum fixation sufficient to provide absolute spinal stability in the ICU setting as a "Damage Control" technique in patients with polytrauma. In less severe injury models, 1 level of fixation above/below may provide adequate spinal stability; although this should be confirmed in future investigations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.