ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Although transfusion support is commonly used in oncological palliative care, there is still a paucity of literature. We examined the transfusion support provided in the terminal stage of the disease and compared the approach at a pediatric oncology unit and a pediatric hospice. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case series analyzed patients treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano (INT)'s pediatric oncology unit who died between January 2018 and April 2022. We compared these with those who died at the VIDAS hospice and analyzed the number of complete blood counts taken in a patient's last 14 days of life, and the number of transfusions performed in the same period.We analyzed 44 patients (22 in pediatric oncology unit; 22 in hospice) in total. Twenty-eight complete blood counts were performed (7/22 patients at the hospice; 21/22 patients at the pediatric oncology unit). Nine patients were given transfusions, three at the hospice, six at our pediatric oncology unit (24 transfusions in total): 20 transfusions at the pediatric oncology unit, four at the hospice. In total 17/44 patients were given active therapies in the last 14 days of life: 13 at the pediatric oncology unit, four at the pediatric hospice. Ongoing cancer treatments did not correlate with a greater likelihood of receiving a transfusion (p=0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The hospice's approach was more conservative than the pediatric oncology one. In the in-hospital setting, the need for a transfusion cannot always be decided on by a combination of numerical values and parameters alone. The family's emotional-relational response must be considered too.
Subject(s)
Hospice Care , Hospices , Neoplasms , Therapeutic Alliance , Humans , Child , Neoplasms/therapy , DeathABSTRACT
AIM: To describe the experience involving the early introduction of palliative care (PC) in oncological patients treated within the paediatric oncology unit of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan and compare this cohort with a cohort of patients resident in the same area treated before the introduction of early palliative care. METHODS: A virtual team was assembled in 2015. The PC providers operate outside the hospital. Conference calls were scheduled to discuss patients' problems. This sample was compared with the clinical records of patients residing in the same area who died between 2009 and 2014. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and April 2019, 41 patients residing in the Milan area mainly with CNS tumours or sarcomas were referred to the team. Comparing the results with the previous cohort, there was a rise in the number of patients dying at home or in a hospice and the duration of PC increased over time. From 2015, none of the patients died in an intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Patients managed by the virtual team were able to continue their cancer treatments, take part in Phase I trials and receive PC. All patients with a poor prognosis should have PC at an early stage.
