ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery have their bases in colonic surgery, through the first protocols published in 2012. Since then, this practice has spread throughout the world, mainly due to improvements in surgical outcomes associated with resource savings. AIM: To analyze the first prospective results after the implementation of the guidelines. METHODS: Were retrospectively analyzed 48 patients operated in the institution prior to the standardization. This group was then compared with a series of 25 patients operated consecutively after the guidelines were implemented. RESULTS: With a 68.6% compliance rate, hospital length of stay (p=0.002), use of abdominal drains (p<0.001) and mechanical bowel preparation (p<0.001) were reduced. Mortality rates, anastomotic fistula, abdominal abscesses and reoperations were also reduced, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols benefit patients care, resulting in better outcomes and possibly resource savings. Even with some limitations, its implementation is feasible in the Brazilian Public Health System.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery have their bases in colonic surgery, through the first protocols published in 2012. Since then, this practice has spread throughout the world, mainly due to improvements in surgical outcomes associated with resource savings. Aim: To analyze the first prospective results after the implementation of the guidelines. Methods: Were retrospectively analyzed 48 patients operated in the institution prior to the standardization. This group was then compared with a series of 25 patients operated consecutively after the guidelines were implemented. Results: With a 68.6% compliance rate, hospital length of stay (p=0.002), use of abdominal drains (p<0.001) and mechanical bowel preparation (p<0.001) were reduced. Mortality rates, anastomotic fistula, abdominal abscesses and reoperations were also reduced, but without statistical significance. Conclusion: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols benefit patients care, resulting in better outcomes and possibly resource savings. Even with some limitations, its implementation is feasible in the Brazilian Public Health System.
RESUMO Racional: Os protocolos de recuperação otimizada após as operações têm as suas bases na cirurgia colônica, através das primeiras diretrizes publicadas em 2012. Desde então, tal prática difundiu-se pelo mundo, principalmente em virtude de melhorias nos resultados cirúrgicos associadas à economia de recursos. Objetivo: Apresentar os primeiros resultados prospectivos após a implementação das novas medidas. Métodos: Foram analisados de forma retrospectiva 48 pacientes operados na instituição previamente à aplicação do protocolo. Esse grupo foi então comparado com uma série de 25 pacientes operados de forma consecutiva após a implementação das diretrizes. Resultados: Com taxa de adesão de 68.6% às medidas propostas, observou-se redução do tempo de internação hospitalar (p=0.002), do uso de drenos abdominais (p<0.001) e do preparo mecânico do cólon (p<0.001). As taxas de mortalidade, de fístula da anastomose, de abscessos abdominais e de reoperações também foram reduzidas, porém sem significância estatística. Conclusão: A adesão às medidas recomendadas no protocolo é benéfica para pacientes e equipe de assistência, acarretando em melhores resultados e possível economia de recursos. Mesmo com algumas limitações, a sua implementação é factível no Sistema Único de Saúde Brasileiro.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Colorectal Surgery/rehabilitation , Clinical Protocols , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Length of StayABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Inhalation therapy is the main treatment for asthma and its adequate use has been a factor responsible for disease control; therefore, the aim of the study was to determine whether a digital media tool, which features portability on mobile phones, modifies the assimilation of the inhalation technique. METHODS: A total of 66 professionals working in the health care area with the pediatric population were selected. They were submitted to a pre-test on their knowledge of inhalation therapy. The professionals were randomized into two groups (A and B). Group A received a media application on their mobile phones showing the steps of inhalation therapy, while group B received the same information in written form only. A post-test was applied after 15 days. The results (pre- and post-) were analyzed by two pediatric pulmonologists. RESULTS: Of the 66 professionals, 87.9% were females. Of a total possible score of ten, the mean score obtained in the pre-test was 5.3 ± 3, and in the second test, 7.5 ± 2 (p < 0.000). There were no significant differences when comparing the two groups (p = 0.726). The nurses had the lowest mean scores in the initial test (2.3 ± 2); however, they were the group that learned the most with the intervention, showing similar means to those of other groups in the second test (6.1 ± 3). CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in knowledge about inhalation therapy in all professional categories using both methods, demonstrating that education, when available to professionals, positively modifies medical practice. .
OBJETIVOS: A inaloterapia representa a principal forma de tratamento da asma e seu uso adequado tem sido fator responsável pelo controle da doença. Desse modo, o objetivo do estudo foi determinar se uma ferramenta de mídia digital, dotada de portabilidade na forma de telefonia móvel, modifica a assimilação da técnica inalatória. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 66 profissionais que atuam na área da saúde com população pediátrica e submetidos a um pré-teste sobre seus conhecimentos de inaloterapia. Os profissionais foram randomizados em dois grupos (A e B). O grupo A recebeu em seu telefone móvel um aplicativo de mídia com os passos da inaloterapia, enquanto o grupo B recebeu as mesmas informações apenas de forma escrita. Após 15 dias, fez-se um pós-teste. Os resultados (pré e pós) foram analisados por dois pneumologistas pediátricos. RESULTADOS: Dos 66 profissionais, 87,9% eram do sexo feminino. Num escore total possível de 10, a média das notas obtidas no pré-teste foi de 5,3 ± 3 e as do segundo teste 7,5 ± 2 (p < 0,000). Não houve diferenças significativas na comparação os dois grupos (p = 0,726). Os profissionais de enfermagem apresentaram a menor média nas provas iniciais (2,3 ± 2), porém foi o grupo que aprendeu mais com a intervenção e apresentou média similar aos outros grupos na segunda prova (6,1 ± 3). CONCLUSÃO: Houve melhoria significativa no conhecimento sobre inaloterapia em todas as categorias profissionais com o uso de ambos os métodos. Isso comprovou que a educação, quando oferecida aos profissionais, modifica positivamente a prática médica. .
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Allergens , Allergens/immunology , Skin Tests/standards , Allergens/administration & dosage , Europe , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Skin Tests/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Inhalation therapy is the main treatment for asthma and its adequate use has been a factor responsible for disease control; therefore, the aim of the study was to determine whether a digital media tool, which features portability on mobile phones, modifies the assimilation of the inhalation technique. METHODS: A total of 66 professionals working in the health care area with the pediatric population were selected. They were submitted to a pre-test on their knowledge of inhalation therapy. The professionals were randomized into two groups (A and B). Group A received a media application on their mobile phones showing the steps of inhalation therapy, while group B received the same information in written form only. A post-test was applied after 15 days. The results (pre- and post-) were analyzed by two pediatric pulmonologists. RESULTS: Of the 66 professionals, 87.9% were females. Of a total possible score of ten, the mean score obtained in the pre-test was 5.3 ± 3, and in the second test, 7.5 ± 2 (p<0.000). There were no significant differences when comparing the two groups (p=0.726). The nurses had the lowest mean scores in the initial test (2.3 ± 2); however, they were the group that learned the most with the intervention, showing similar means to those of other groups in the second test (6.1 ± 3). CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in knowledge about inhalation therapy in all professional categories using both methods, demonstrating that education, when available to professionals, positively modifies medical practice.
Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Nursing, Continuing/methods , Health Personnel/education , Mobile Applications , Respiratory Therapy/education , Adult , Cell Phone/instrumentation , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Respiratory Therapy/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of salbutamol, in a helium-oxygen mixture (80:20), can modify outcome and risk of hospitalization of pediatric patients. METHODS: A controlled cohort study including patients aged 2 months to 12 years with diagnoses of asthmatic crisis or viral bronchiolitis. Intensity was characterized from moderate to severe, as measured by clinical score (pulmonary index, PI) for obstructive disease. Scores > 8 were considered eligible. The Heliox® group was composed of 20 patients and the Oxygen group of 40 patients. Patients received sequentially, at 20-min intervals, until six nebulization cycles were completed (2-h period): salbutamol 0.15 mg/kg/dose (maximum 5 mg). The nebulized drug was driven either by Heliox® mixture (80:20) or 100% oxygen. Patients diagnosed with acute asthmatic crisis received, additionally, prednisolone (2 mg/kg) orally. RESULTS: Eleven patients in the Heliox® group still required treatment at 6 h, against 38 patients in the group receiving oxygen-driven nebulization (p = 0.034). At 12 h, 7 patients in the Heliox® group remained under observation, against 27 in the Oxygen group. Differences regarding the need for supplemental oxygen were observed only at 6 h of treatment (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Heliox® (80:20), for salbutamol administration, is effective in the treatment of pediatric obstructive disease that responds to bronchodilator therapy. Compared to usual aerosol delivery technique, Heliox®-driven salbutamol nebulization is associated with shorter stay in the observation room after 6 h of treatment.
Subject(s)
Albuterol/administration & dosage , Asthma/therapy , Bronchiolitis/therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Helium/administration & dosage , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Determinar se a utilização de salbutamol, em uma mistura de hélio-oxigênio (80:20), modifica a evolução e o risco de internação em pacientes pediátricos. MÉTODOS: Delineado estudo de coorte controlada que incluiu pacientes de 2 meses a 12 anos de idade, com diagnósticos de crise de asma ou bronquiolite viral. Intensidades caracterizadas de moderada a grave, aferidas através de escore clínico (pulmonary index, PI) para doença obstrutiva. Foram considerados elegíveis escores > 8. Vinte pacientes constituíram o grupo Heliox® e 40 o grupo Oxigênio. Os pacientes receberam sequencialmente, em intervalos de 20 min, até completar seis nebulizações (período de 2 h): salbutamol 0,15 mg/kg/dose (máximo 5 mg). A droga utilizou como veículo gerador do aerossol a mistura de Heliox® (80:20) ou oxigênio a 100 por cento. Os pacientes com diagnóstico de crise aguda de asma receberam, adicionalmente, prednisolona (2 mg/kg) via oral. RESULTADOS: Onze pacientes do grupo Heliox® permaneceram necessitando de tratamento na 6ª h de atendimento, enquanto que no grupo que recebia nebulização veiculada em oxigênio, esse número foi de 38 (p = 0,034). Na 12ª h, 7 pacientes do grupo Heliox® permaneciam em observação, enquanto no grupo Oxigênio foram 27 (p = 0,02). Diferenças quanto à necessidade de suplementação de oxigênio foram observadas apenas na 6ª h de tratamento (p = 0,02). CONCLUSÕES: Heliox® (80:20), para administração de salbutamol, é efetivo no tratamento da doença obstrutiva infantil que apresente resposta à terapêutica broncodilatadora. Comparado à técnica usual de nebulização, está associado à menor permanência em sala de observação após 6 h de tratamento.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of salbutamol, in a helium-oxygen mixture (80:20), can modify outcome and risk of hospitalization of pediatric patients. METHODS: A controlled cohort study including patients aged 2 months to 12 years with diagnoses of asthmatic crisis or viral bronchiolitis. Intensity was characterized from moderate to severe, as measured by clinical score (pulmonary index, PI) for obstructive disease. Scores > 8 were considered eligible. The Heliox® group was composed of 20 patients and the Oxygen group of 40 patients. Patients received sequentially, at 20-min intervals, until six nebulization cycles were completed (2-h period): salbutamol 0.15 mg/kg/dose (maximum 5 mg). The nebulized drug was driven either by Heliox® mixture (80:20) or 100 percent oxygen. Patients diagnosed with acute asthmatic crisis received, additionally, prednisolone (2 mg/kg) orally. RESULTS: Eleven patients in the Heliox® group still required treatment at 6 h, against 38 patients in the group receiving oxygen-driven nebulization (p = 0.034). At 12 h, 7 patients in the Heliox® group remained under observation, against 27 in the Oxygen group. Differences regarding the need for supplemental oxygen were observed only at 6 h of treatment (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Heliox® (80:20), for salbutamol administration, is effective in the treatment of pediatric obstructive disease that responds to bronchodilator therapy. Compared to usual aerosol delivery technique, Heliox®-driven salbutamol nebulization is associated with shorter stay in the observation room after 6 h of treatment.
Subject(s)
Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Asthma/therapy , Bronchiolitis/therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Helium/administration & dosage , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Emergencies , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objetivo: descrever os possíveis efeitos clínicos e laoratoriais da instilação traqueal de surfactante exógeno a um lactente com bronquiolite viral aguda grave e submetido a ventilação mecânica. Relato: menina de 2 meses de idade com diagnóstico clínico de bronquiolite viral aguda e subetida a ventilação mecânica, necessitando de altos picos de pressão inspiratória positiva (35 a 45cmH2O) e elevada fração de oxigênio inspirado (FiO2=0,9), sem resposta clínica favorável ou melhora na gasometria arterial. Optou-se por instilar surfactante exógeno endotraqueal (Exosurf, Glaxo 50 mg/kg) para permitir utilizar um regime ventilatório menos agressivo. Resultados: quatro horas após a administração do surfactante, foi possível reduzir o pico inspiratório de pressão (PIP) de 35 para 30 cmH20; a FiO2 de 0,9 para 0,6 e aumentar a pressão positiva ao final de expiração (PEEP) de 6 para 9 cmH2O. Neste período observou-se uma elevação na relação paO2/FiO2 de 120 para 266. Ao completar 24 horas, a FiO2 pode ser reduzida até 0,4. Discussão: neste relato pretendemos demonstrar que a inativação do surfactante pode ser um fator decisivo na evolução desfavorável de alguns casos graves de bronquiolite. A instilação traqueal de surfactante, nestes casos, além de promover uma rápida resposta clínica permite que se adotem técnicas ventilatórias menos agressivas
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Bronchiolitis, ViralABSTRACT
Os autores fazem revisão sobre as vacinas do calendário básico de vacinação preconizado pela Secretaria da Saúde e pela Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria e algumas das vacinas do calendário avançado