Biological Glue as an Alternative to Suction Drainage in Tissue-Expanded Flaps in Children: Cost-Effectiveness Study.

INTRODUCTION: Biological glue is already used as a hemostatic agent and tissue adhesive in plastic surgery. This study evaluates the use of this glue as an alternative to suction drainage for the adhesion of tissue-expanded flaps in pediatric patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter case-control study on 48 flap procedures conducted on 42 children (5 months-12 years of age) between 2004 and 2017, comparing a "glue" group (n = 24) with a control group (n = 24), in which a classic redon drain was used. The control patients were matched according to age, etiology, location of the lesion, and the size of the expander. The primary end point was the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: The conditions were 24 cases of congenital nevus, 14 of cicatricial alopecia, and 10 of sebaceous hamartoma. Twenty-nine lesions were located on the scalp, 15 on the back, 2 on the thigh, and 2 on the buttocks.The average surgical durations (48 ± 24 vs 63 ± 32 minutes, P = 0.13) and average room occupancy time (126 ± 21 vs 139 ± 44 minutes, P = 0.29) were similar between the glue group and the control group. However, the average duration of hospital stay was lower in the glue group (1.5 ± 1.5 days) than in the control group (3.6 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). The complication rates between the groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The application of glue on expanded flaps is as reliable as suction drainage with the advantage of reducing the duration of hospital stay and potentially enabling outpatient treatment for certain patients.

Silver Sulfadiazine and Cerium Nitrate in Ischemic Skin Necrosis of the Leg and Foot: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Flammacerium is a topical treatment composed of silver sulfadiazine and cerium nitrate initially used in burns. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of silver sulfadiazine and cerium nitrate on ischemic necrosis wounds of the lower limb as an alternative to amputation for a period of 12 weeks. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive silver sulfadiazine and cerium nitrate or standard care. Patients included adults with an ischemic wound of the lower limb, with necrosis covering over at least 50%. Critical ischemia limb was confirmed by an ankle-brachial index <0.7 or >1.3 with radiological confirmation. Patient demographic data, amputations procedures, wound area, Visual Analogue Scale pain rating, clinical infection, and adverse events were recorded. Fifty patients, 34 males and 16 females, were recruited between January 2010 and April 2014, 25 in each group. The mean age was 75.14 years (±11.64). Nine amputations (36%) occurred in each group. Amputation-free survival was superior in the active treatment group versus the standard group (169 393 days, 95% confidence interval = 134.926-203.861, vs 169 393 days, 95% confidence interval = 134.926-203.861). It was not statistically significant (log-rank, P = .958). Wound area reduction between both groups was not statistically different ( P = .651). Less adverse events of the lower limb occurred in the active treatment group ( P = .001). Our study showed that silver sulfadiazine and cerium nitrate is not inferior to standardized care on ischemic necrotic wounds of the lower extremity. Further studies are still needed to confirm its effectiveness.

New techniques for wound management: A systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds.

Debridement is a crucial component of wound management. Recent technologies such as hydrosurgery (Versajet), ultrasound therapy (the MIST therapy device), or plasma-mediated bipolar radio-frequency ablation therapy (Coblation) seem to represent interesting alternatives for wound debridement. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe, evaluate, and compare these three recently developed methods for the management of chronic wounds. In January 2016, an electronic database search was conducted of MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase for articles concerning these three innovative methods for the management of chronic wounds. A total of 389 references were identified by our search strategy, and 15 articles were included. We extracted data regarding the number and age of patients, indications, operating time, number of procedures, costs, wound healing time, decrease in exudation, perioperative blood loss, bacterial load, and the occurrence of complications. The 15 articles included studies that involved 563 patients who underwent hydrosurgery (7 studies), ultrasound therapy (6 studies), or Coblation (2 studies). Six randomized controlled trials were included that compared the use of a scalpel or curette to hydrosurgery (2 studies) or ultrasound therapy (6 studies). Hydrosurgery, in addition to being a very precise and selective tool, allows significantly faster debridement. Ultrasound therapy provides a significant reduction of exudation, and improves the wound healing time. No comparative study dedicated to Coblation was identified. Despite the obvious clinical interest of the topic, our review of the current literature revealed a lack of prospective randomized studies comparing these devices with each other or with standard techniques, particularly for Coblation and hydrosurgery.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Evaluation of the Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Venous Leg Ulcers.

This study aimed to determine the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs). A double-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare incidence of complete wound closure, ulcer size and pain reduction in patients randomized to 24 treatments of placebo or LLLT (635 nm) over 12 weeks. Patients presented with a 6-week history of VLUs ranging in size from 5 to 20 cm2. Venous origin was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and an ankle brachial index of 0.8 or greater. Of 24 patients, 23% of the test group (n = 13) and 18% of placebo group (n = 11) achieved complete wound closure. At 12 weeks, patients in test and placebo groups had a mean surface area reduction of 6.26 cm2 ( P < .0001) and 6.72 cm2 ( P < .005), respectively, and a mean pain score decrease of 43.54 points ( P < .0001) and 25.73 points ( P = .002) respectively. Differences between groups was not statistically significant for wound closure ( P = 1.0) or ulcer size ( P = .80). Mean ulcer pain was significantly reduced from initiation of treatment compared with 4 weeks' follow-up after 12 weeks with LLLT ( P < .01). Within the limitations of the study, LLLT may not have early effects as an adjunctive therapy to wound healing of VLUs, but LLLT may have delayed effects on VLU healing and associated pain, which requires further study.