Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound During Critical Illness in Children: Survey of Practices in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Centers.

OBJECTIVES: The scope of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the practice of pediatric neurocritical care is unknown. We have surveyed pediatric neurocritical care centers on their use of transcranial Doppler and analyzed clinical management practices. DESIGN: Electronic-mail recruitment with survey of expert centers using web-based questionnaire. SETTING: Survey of 43 hospitals (31 United States, 12 international) belonging to the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 67% (29/43) hospital-response rate. Of these centers, 27 reported using transcranial Doppler in the PICU; two hospitals opted out due to lack of transcranial Doppler availability/use. The most common diagnoses for using transcranial Doppler in clinical care were intracranial/subarachnoid hemorrhage (20 hospitals), arterial ischemic stroke (14 hospitals), and traumatic brain injury (10 hospitals). Clinical studies were carried out and interpreted by credentialed individuals in 93% (25/27) and 78% (21/27) of the centers, respectively. A written protocol for performance of transcranial Doppler in the PICU was available in 30% (8/27 hospitals); of these, two of eight hospitals routinely performed correlation studies to validate results. In 74% of the centers (20/27), transcranial Doppler results were used to guide clinical care: that is, when to obtain a neuroimaging study (18 hospitals); how to manipulate cerebral perfusion pressure with fluids/vasopressors (13 hospitals); and whether to perform a surgical intervention (six hospitals). Research studies were also commonly performed for a range of diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: At least 27 pediatric neurocritical care centers use transcranial Doppler during clinical care. In the majority of centers, studies are performed and interpreted by credentialed personnel, and findings are used to guide clinical management. Further studies are needed to standardize these practices.

Stroke After Cardiac Catheterization in Children.

BACKGROUND: Children with cardiac disease are at high risk for stroke. Approximately one-quarter of strokes in children with cardiac disease occur in the peri-procedural period; yet, the risk factors, clinical presentation, and treatment of post-catheterization stroke in children have not been well defined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients aged zero to 18 years with a new clinically-apparent arterial ischemic stroke after cardiac catheterization at a tertiary children's hospital from 2006 to 2016. We excluded patients who had cardiac surgery, a cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, a ventricular assist device, or an arrhythmia proximate to their stroke. RESULTS: Twenty children had a new clinically-apparent post-catheterization arterial ischemic stroke. The median age was one year (range, two days to 16 years). The most common procedures were balloon dilation for pulmonary vein stenosis (n = 6) and systemic pulmonary collateral closure (n = 5). The most common presenting symptoms were arm weakness (n = 10) and seizure (n = 8). The median time from catheterization to symptom discovery was 31.5 hours (interquartile range, 16.2 to 47.8 hours; n = 18). The median Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure score 12 months post-stroke was 0.75 (range, 0 to 2; n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Although arterial ischemic stroke after cardiac catheterization is rare, better understanding this entity is important as children with cardiac disease and stroke have ongoing morbidity. Ameliorating this morbidity requires efforts aimed at preventing and rapidly detecting stroke, thereby enabling timely institution of neuroprotective measures and treatment with hyperacute therapies.

Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Evolution of a New Clinical Service in PICUs Across the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric neurocritical care as a conceptual service is relatively new, and implementation of such specialized services may improve outcomes for children with disorders of the brain or spinal cord. How many pediatric neurocritical care services currently exist in the United States, and attitudes about such a service are unknown. DESIGN: Web-based survey, distributed by e-mail. SETTING: Survey was sent to PICU Medical Directors and Program Directors of Pediatric Neurosurgery fellowship and Child Neurology residency programs. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 378 surveys were distributed; 161 respondents representing 128 distinct hospitals completed the survey (43% response rate). Thirty-five percent (45/128) reported having a pediatric neurocritical care service. The most common type of service used a consultation model (82%; 32/39 responses). Other types of services were intensivist-led teams in the PICU (five hospitals) and dedicated PICU beds (two hospitals). Hospital characteristics associated with availability of pediatric neurocritical care services were level 1 trauma status (p = 0.017), greater numbers of PICU beds (χ [6, n = 128] = 136.84; p < 0.01), and greater volume of children with pediatric neurocritical care conditions (χ [3, n = 128] = 20.16; p < 0.01). The most common reasons for not having a pediatric neurocritical care service were low patient volume (34/119 responses), lack of subspecialists (30/119 responses), and lack of interest by PICU faculty (25/119 responses). The positive impacts of a pediatric neurocritical care service were improved interdisciplinary education/training (16/45 responses), dedicated expertise (13/45 responses), improved interservice communication (9/45 responses), and development/implementation of guidelines and protocols (9/45 responses). The negative impacts of a pediatric neurocritical care service were disagreement among consultants (2/45 responses) and splitting of the PICU population (2/45 responses). CONCLUSIONS: At least 45 specialized pediatric neurocritical care services exist in the United States. Eighty percent of these services are a consultation service to the PICU. Hospitals with level 1 trauma status, greater numbers of PICU beds, and greater numbers of patients with pediatric neurocritical care conditions were associated with the existence of pediatric neurocritical care as a clinical service.