ABSTRACT
Purpose: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. Diagnostic tools that currently exist include painful provocative maneuvers, invasive nerve conduction studies and the use of tests that require physician's direct participation in an era of sanitary crisis and virtual consultations. Therefore, having an easily accessible, reliable and practical tool for diagnosing CTS would be highly beneficial. Herein, we investigated the diagnostic value of the "pronation compensation sign" that we described for diagnosing CTS. Patients and Methods: We included 18 hands with and 18 hands without CTS (age: CTS hands = 52.5 ± 13.8 years, non-CTS hands = 43.2 ± 12.3 years; sex ratio: CTS hands = 12:8, non-CTS hands = 9:9). The presence of the "pronation compensation sign" was evaluated in each included hand. The presence of the "pronation compensation sign" were compared between CTS and non-CTS hands using the chi-squared test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated of the "pronation compensation sign" for CTS. Results: All 18 hands with CTS showed a positive "pronation compensation sign", while those without CTS were negative. All 18 hands that were positive for the "pronation compensation sign" were hands with CTS, while those that were negative were hands without CTS. The sensitivity and specificity of the "pronation compensation sign" for diagnosing CTS were both 100%. The PPV and NPV of the "pronation compensation sign" for CTS were both 1.000. The rates of the presence of the "pronation compensation sign" were significantly different between hands with and without CTS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The "pronation compensation sign" seems a useful tool for diagnosing CTS. We believe that the "pronation compensation sign" will help clinicians diagnose CTS with high diagnostic accuracy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Many clinicians are unfamiliar with a diagnosis of lacertus syndrome (LS). We investigated the value of the lacertus notch sign in diagnosing LS. METHODS: We included 56 consecutive patients (112 upper extremities) who had neuropathic pain and neurological symptoms of the hand. The presence of LS and the lacertus notch sign in each upper extremity was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 83 upper extremities with LS, 54 (65.1%) had a lacertus notch sign, whereas 29 (34.9%) did not. Of the 29 upper extremities without LS, 9 (31.0%) and 20 (69.0%) had and did not have a lacertus notch sign, respectively. The rates of lacertus notch presence in upper extremities with and without LS were significantly different. Of the 63 upper extremities with a lacertus notch sign, 54 (85.7%) were diagnosed with LS, whereas 9 (14.3%) were not. Of the 49 upper extremities without a lacertus notch sign, 20 (40.8%) were diagnosed with LS, and 29 (59.2%) were not. We observed significant differences in the rates of LS in upper extremities with and without lacertus notch. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the lacertus notch sign is useful for diagnosing LS. When patients with neuropathic pain and neurological symptoms present with a lacertus notch sign, clinicians should consider the possibility of LS.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The double crush syndrome describes a condition characterized by multifocal entrapment of a nerve. In the upper limb, the high prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome makes it a common diagnosis of assumption in the setting of median neuropathy. More proximal compressions may tend to be overlooked, under-diagnosed and under-treated in the population. This study aims to map the prevalence of peripheral upper limb nerve compressions among patients undergoing peripheral nerve decompression. METHODS: A prospective case series was conducted on 183 patients undergoing peripheral nerve decompression in a private hand surgery clinic. Level(s) of nerve compression in the median, ulnar and radial nerves were determined by history and physical examination. The prevalence of each nerve compression syndrome or combination of syndromes was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 320 upper limbs in 183 patients were analyzed. A double crush of the median nerve at the levels of the lacertus fibrosus and carpal tunnel was identified in 78% of upper limbs with median neuropathy, whereas isolated lacertus syndrome and carpal tunnel syndrome were present in only 5% and 17% of affected limbs respectively. Cubital tunnel syndrome affected 12.5% of upper limbs, and 80% of these had concomitant lacertus and carpal tunnel syndromes, compared to only 7.5% with isolated cubital tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence should prompt clinicians towards more routine assessment for double crush syndrome to avoid misdiagnosis, inadequate treatment, recurrence, and revision surgeries.
