Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 11(7): 662-71, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2011, 25,056 notifications of suspected occupational dermatitis (OD) were submitted to the statutory accident insurance (UVT), predominant by dermatologist's reports. Parallel to the introduction of the improved dermatologist's procedure, the hierarchical multi-step intervention approach to OD was launched within the UVT. It is aimed at ensuring that patients with OD can be allocated to preventive dermatological interventions quickly and appropriately according to the severity of their OD. From 2007-2010, the quality of dermatological interventions as well as the corresponding administrative procedures were evaluated in a unique research project supported by the German Social Accident Insurance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: About 10 % (n = 1 600) of notified cases with suspected OD in 2007 in Germany were analyzed in a random quota sample by occupational dermatologists and administrations. Follow-up was 12 months. If a dermatologist's procedure was initiated after the initial notification, patients' and dermatologists' opinions were obtained by questionnaires. RESULTS: More than 85 % of the OD notifications were submitted by dermatologists and only 1.6 % by occupational physicians. In 88 %, the dermatologist's report was used. Yet, there is room for optimizing procedures: e.g., the clinical and/or occupational relevance of type IV allergies was assessed only in 36.5 % of patients. Job loss due to OD occurred less often if suitable preventive and/or therapeutic strategies (e.g., skin protection seminars) were implemented by the UVT (p = 0.001). Preventive and therapeutic strategies were initiated more often when the dermatologist's report was conclusive, a central element is the outpatient care by a dermatologist. CONCLUSIONS: The research project shows that the quality of dermatological intervention, as well as administrative procedures, can be optimized. Early intervention with suitable preventive and therapeutic strategies in patients with OD should be aimed at, as this is crucial for the outcome of OD.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Secondary Prevention/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 9(1): 42-6, 2011 Jan.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20825529

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The dermatologist's procedure ("procedure for early detection of occupational skin diseases") enables dermatologists to conduct the relevant diagnostics at the expenses of the statutory employers' liability insurance funds (UVT) if there is a possibility of a work-related skin disorder in an employee. Acceptance of this most relevant tool for secondary prevention in occupational dermatology in Germany is high and most dermatologists make careful use of this unparalleled privilege. However, there have been occasional complaints by the UVT, concerning overly extensive diagnostics. Consequently, the Task Force on Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) of the German Society of Dermatology set up a review board in May 1999. RESULTS: Dermatologists' reports in question were submitted by the UVT to the review board and reviewed separately by two experienced occupational dermatologists both in the 1(st) period (1999-2003) and now in the second period (June 2003 - November 2009). The criticism of the reviewers was mostly directed towards the number of tests and an insufficient documentation in the dermatologist's report. There were 69 dermatologists' reports submitted to the review board (as compared to 155 in the 1(st) period). CONCLUSIONS: The decreased number of dermatologists' reports submitted could be a result of the review process itself. Other factors may include the optimization of the dermatologist's report with a better reimbursement as well as the recent publication of guidelines and continuous education in occupational dermatology with certification of more than 700 dermatologists. These measures of quality assurance are aimed to further optimize the dermatologist's procedure and to allow for improved and more rapid care for patients with occupational dermatoses by dermatologists.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Dermatology/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...