Narcotrend and Bispectral Index monitor are superior to classic electroencephalographic parameters for the assessment of anesthetic states during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: A new electroencephalogram monitor, the Narcotrend, was developed to measure anesthetic depth. The authors compared the Narcotrend, the Bispectral Index, and classic electroencephalographic and hemodynamic parameters during anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. METHODS: The authors investigated 25 patients undergoing laminectomy at different anesthetic states: awake, steady state anesthesia, first reaction during emergence, and extubation. Narcotrend value; BIS; relative power (percent) in delta, theta, alpha, and beta; median frequency; spectral edge frequency; and hemodynamic parameters were recorded simultaneously. The ability of the classic and processed electroencephalographic and hemodynamic parameters to predict the clinically relevant anesthetic states of awake, steady state anesthesia, first reaction, and extubation was tested using prediction probability. RESULTS: Only the Narcotrend was able to differentiate between awake versus steady state anesthesia and steady state anesthesia versus first reaction/extubation with a prediction probability value of more than 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Modern electroencephalographic parameters, especially Narcotrend, are more reliable indicators for the clinical assessment of anesthetic states than classic parameters.

ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during the induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

UNLABELLED: A new commercial auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitor (A-line AEP monitor) was developed to calculate an index (ARX AEP index; AAI) by automatically using the amplitudes and latencies of the AEP. We investigated 30 patients before spine surgery. AAI; bispectral index (BIS); relative (%) delta, theta, alpha, and beta; spectral edge frequency; median frequency; mean arterial blood pressure; heart rate; and oxygen saturation were obtained simultaneously during stepwise (1.0 micro g/mL) induction of target-controlled propofol concentration until 5.0 micro g/mL, followed by an infusion of 0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) of remifentanil. Every minute, the patients were asked to squeeze the observer's hand. Prediction probability (Pk), receiver operating characteristic, and logistic regression were used to calculate the probability to predict the conditions AWAKE, UNCONSCIOUSNESS (first loss of hand squeeze), and steady-state ANESTHESIA (5.0 micro g/mL of propofol and 0.3 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) of remifentanil). Although a statistically significant difference among the conditions was observed for AAI, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, median frequency, and %alpha, only AAI and BIS were able to distinguish UNCONSCIOUSNESS versus AWAKE and ANESTHESIA versus AWAKE with better than Pk = 0.90. The modern electroencephalographic variables AAI and BIS were superior to the classic electroencephalographic and hemodynamic variables to distinguish the observed anesthetic conditions. IMPLICATIONS: The modern electroencephalographic ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and the bispectral index were superior to the classic electroencephalographic and hemodynamic variables for predicting anesthetic conditions. Variables derived from the auditory evoked potential did not provide an advantage over variables derived from spontaneous electroencephalogram.

Narcotrend, bispectral index, and classical electroencephalogram variables during emergence from propofol/remifentanil anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate modern and classical electroencephalographic (EEG) variables in response to remifentanil and propofol infusions. We hypothesized that modern EEG variables may indicate the effects of propofol but not of remifentanil. Twenty-five patients were included in the study after the end of elective spine surgery without any surgical stimulation. Baseline values were defined with remifentanil 0.3 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) and target-controlled infusion of propofol 3.0 microg/mL. EEG changes were evaluated 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min after the stop of remifentanil infusion, followed by a step-by-step reduction (0.2 microg/mL) every 3 min of target-controlled infusion propofol. Narcotrend (NT; classifying EEG stages from awake to deep anesthesia), bispectral index (BIS), EEG spectral frequency bands (%), 50% (Median) and 95% percentiles (spectral edge frequency), mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were detected at every time point. The end of remifentanil application resulted in significant increases in %alpha, spectral edge frequency, mean arterial blood pressure, and %theta and decreases in %delta (P < 0.05). NT, BIS, Median, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were unchanged. Decreases in propofol concentration were associated with statistically significant increases in NT and BIS (P < 0.05). Thus, the sedative-hypnotic component of propofol could be estimated by modern EEG variables (NT and BIS), whereas the analgesic component provided by remifentanil was not indicated. However, during conditions without surgical stimulation, neither NT nor BIS provided an adequate assessment of the depth of anesthesia when a remifentanil infusion was used. IMPLICATIONS: We investigated modern and classical electroencephalographic (EEG) variables during emergence from propofol/remifentanil anesthesia. Modern EEG variables indicate changes of infusion in propofol, but not in remifentanil. Thus, modern EEG variables did not provide an adequate assessment of depth of anesthesia when remifentanil was used.