Do racial disparities exist in a spine surgery practice that serves a predominately minority population? Outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective review.

Background: Racial minority status is associated with inferior peri-operative outcomes following spinal fusion. Findings have largely been reported within institutions serving few minority patients. This study aimed to identify if racial disparities exist for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures within an urban academic medical center which serves a majority non-White population. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent a TLIF procedure at our institution between 06/2016-10/2019. Primary outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, 30-day return to the emergency department (ED), 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day complication rates. One-hundred-fifty-six patients (female: male, 99: 57) met inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical data (body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, preoperative lab values) were compared. Results: The mean LOS was 6.2, 5.9, and 6 days in the White, Hispanic, and Black cohorts, respectively (p = 0.92). There were no differences in discharge disposition between groups (p = 0.52). Thirty-day post-operative complication rates did not differ between groups (p > 0.07). Readmission rates did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). ED visits were more prevalent in the Hispanic group with 16 visits as compared to 8 and 4 in the White and Black groups respectively (p = 0.01). Conclusions: We found no racial disparities in terms of LOS, discharge disposition, or 30-day readmission rates. Hispanic patients demonstrated an increased utilization of the ED in the early post-operative period. Efforts to overcome language barriers, communicate instructions clearly, and outline post-operative expectations and plans may prevent the need for post-operative ED visits.

The Value of 2 Orthopaedic Learning Platforms from the Learners' and Educators' Point of View.

Online learning platforms are a staple of orthopaedic resident education. These platforms typically address a user's knowledge base, aiming to improve OITE and AAOS Board Examination scores. Orthopaedic residents often use these platforms as their primary educational resource. However, an orthopaedic surgeon is more than an orthopaedic knowledge base; acquisition of clinical acumen is integral as well. We sought to investigate the following: From a learner's and educator's perspective, do Orthobullets (OB) and Clinical Classroom (CC) contribute to both knowledge base and clinical acumen? Methods: Thirty residents and 16 attending surgeons at a single institution were assigned to review topics and complete questions on either the OB and CC platform. Participants then filled out surveys regarding the platform they were assigned, switched platforms, and completed a final survey. Independent-samples Student t tests and χ2 tests were used to analyze differences in continuous and categorical data. Results: Residents and attendings reported a preference for OB for fact acquisition, relevance to the OITE, and explanation of answers. Senior residents (PGY5) and attending surgeons reported that CC had a greater impact on their clinical acumen. Junior residents (PGY1, PGY2, and PGY3) reported the opposite. Participants responded that both platforms expand a learner's knowledge base and clinical acumen. Conclusions: Learners and educators felt both platforms addressed knowledge base and clinical acumen. Junior residents reported a preference for OB to CC to advance their knowledge base and clinical acumen, but senior residents and attendings felt the opposite was true. Based on survey responses, these platforms were found to be additive, complementary, and that their value to the learner changes during the course of residency education. Level of Evidence: III.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Patient-related Short-term Cancellation of Elective Arthroscopic Surgery: A Case-matched Study.

INTRODUCTION: Short-term cancellation of elective ambulatory orthopaedic surgery can result in disruption to the process flow of the operating room, with resultant negative financial implications for the health system. The risk factors for patient-related short-term cancellations within 24 hours of the surgical date have not been well defined. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single orthopaedic surgery electronic internal database was done to identify all cancellations from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, which were made within 24 hours of the surgical date. Inclusion criteria included elective arthroscopic procedures canceled solely for patient-related issues. Any cancellation for surgeon-related or ambulatory center-related reasons was excluded. Demographic patient and surgical data, including insurance type, employment status, previous history of cancellation for the same surgery, socioeconomic status based on the Area Deprivation Index, and surgery type, were tabulated. Each cancellation was matched 1:2 with noncanceled cases based on the anatomic site of the arthroscopy scheduled. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations of patient demographic and medical characteristics with surgical cancellation. RESULTS: There were 4,715 total arthroscopic procedures done during the study period, of which 126 (2.7%) were canceled within 24 hours of the surgery date. The mean age of the canceled cases was 44.9 ± 16.1 years (range, 14 to 77 years), with 46 females (43%) included. The presence of MRI of the involved joint within 6 months of surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.91) and current employment (aOR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) were independently predictive of noncancellation. Current smokers were more likely to cancel within 24 hours of surgery (aOR, 2.63, 95% CI, 1.4-4.9). Finally, having previously canceled the same surgery was significantly associated with a current surgical cancellation (P = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Identification of the factors associated with short-term patient-related cancellation of elective arthroscopy may serve as the basis for preoperative interventions aimed specifically at those more likely to cancel. In turn, these interventions can minimize preventable cancellations.

Variability in the reported surgical techniques and methods for intercalary reconstruction following tumor resection.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently no consensus regarding the best techniques or surgical strategies with which to maximize intercalary allograft reconstruction outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to assess which techniques and methods are being utilized by North American orthopaedic oncologists. METHODS: Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. The survey presented participants with two clinical scenarios and interrogated them on their preferred type of allograft, method of compression and fixation, and additional techniques used. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six physicians completed the questionnaire. The majority studied in the United States (82%) and worked at an academic medical center (71%). Over half (54%) reported seeing over 10 primary bone tumors every year. Respondents were split between preferring a structural allograft alone or using a combined allograft-vascularized fibular graft. A majority indicated a preference for plate(s) and screw fixation but were divided between the use of two compression plates with a spanning plate, a single compression plate with a spanning plate, and two compression plates with an intramedullary nail. Screw fixation preferences were split between the use of unicortical locking only, bicortical locking only, and a combination of unicortical and bicortical locking. Almost equal percentages of respondents reported they would have used two, three, or four screws in both scenarios. Respondents were split between placing screws equidistantly and placing them peripherally within the allograft, adjacent to the allograft-host junction. DISCUSSION: There is no clear surgical preference for intercalary reconstruction following tumor extirpation within this sample of orthopaedic oncologists. The current survey demonstrates variability across nearly every aspect of allograft reconstruction, which may, in part, explain the wide spectrum of outcomes reported within the literature. Prospective studies are warranted to better evaluate technique-specific outcomes in an effort to maximize reconstructive longevity and minimize allograft related complications.

Hip arthroscopy as a treatment for obturator neuropathy secondary to intra-pelvic ganglion: a case report.

The most common types of cystic lesions around the hip joint are synovial or ganglion cysts. In rare cases, the cysts can compress adjacent structures and cause symptoms to arise. Obturator neuropathy secondary to a hip ganglion cyst is a rare phenomenon, with scarce reports on suggested treatment options. Hip arthroscopy is a potential minimally invasive treatment that has yet to be described in such cases. We present a 52-year-old male suffering from obturator neuropathy caused by an intra-pelvic ganglion cyst arising from the hip joint. Hip arthroscopy was performed for decompression of the cyst and dilation of the stalk opening. Six-month post-operative follow-up showed resolution of symptoms and complete elimination of the cyst on magnetic resonance imaging.