ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial aneurysms are more common in women than in men. Some anatomical variants of the circle of Willis (CoW) are associated with a higher risk of developing intracranial aneurysms. We hypothesized that variations of the CoW are sex dependent which may partly explain why intracranial aneurysms are more common in women. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to compare the presence of anatomical variations of the CoW between women and men in the general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE using predefined criteria, following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. The presence of different CoW anatomical variants and a complete CoW was compared between women and men using an inverse variance weighted random effects meta-analysis to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included reporting on 5478 healthy participants (2511 women, 2967 men). Bilateral fetal type posterior cerebral arteries (RR 2.79; 95%CI 1.65-4.72, I2=0%), and a complete CoW (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13-1.36; I2=0%) were more prevalent in women than in men. The variants absence or hypoplasia of one of the anterior cerebral arteries (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.38-0.88, I2=57%) and hypoplasia or absence of both posterior communicating arteries (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.71-0.87, I2=0%) were more prevalent in men. CONCLUSIONS: Several anatomical variations of the CoW are sex dependent, with some variants being more common in women while others in men. Future research should assess how these sex-specific CoW variants relate to the sex-specific occurrence of intracranial aneurysms.
Subject(s)
Intracranial Aneurysm , Male , Humans , Female , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Circle of Willis/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cerebral Artery , Posterior Cerebral ArteryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asymmetry in diameter between pre-communicating (A1) segments of the anterior cerebral arteries is related to anterior communicating artery aneurysm formation. Diameter asymmetry definitions vary and have not been related to blood flow measurements using the same imaging modality. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between A1-diameter asymmetry and blood flow asymmetry and to define a hemodynamically significant cut-off value for A1-diameter asymmetry. We assessed sex differences between different groups of A1-asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3-Tesla time-of-flight MRA and 4D-phase-contrast MRI were performed in 122 healthy participants. Diameter and blood flow measurements were performed halfway in both A1-segments. Participants were subdivided based on A1-diameter asymmetry: ≤10% (symmetric); 11-20%; 21-30%; 31-40%; and >40% (increasing asymmetry) groups. We studied the relationship between A1-diameter asymmetry and corresponding flow asymmetry (scatterplot and correlation). A hemodynamic-based cutoff value for A1-asymmetry was determined by comparing dominant A1 blood flow in the asymmetry groups to the mean blood flow of the symmetric A1-group (linear mixed-effects model). Sex-related differences in A1-diameter, blood flow and asymmetry were assessed with t-tests. RESULTS: A1-diameter asymmetry was linearly related to blood flow asymmetry between dominant and non-dominant sides. A1-diameter asymmetry >30% yielded statistically significant increased blood flow in the dominant A1 compared to symmetric A1s. Men had statistically significant larger A1-diameters, higher blood flow and a similar degree of A1-diameter asymmetry compared to women. CONCLUSION: A1-diameter asymmetry is linearly related to blood flow asymmetry. A >30% A1-asymmetry can be used as hemodynamically significant cut-off value. There were no sex-related differences in A1-diameter asymmetry.
