Health effects of air pollution on respiratory symptoms: A longitudinal study using digital health sensors.

Previous studies of air pollution and respiratory disease often relied on aggregated or lagged acute respiratory disease outcome measures, such as emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations, which may lack temporal and spatial resolution. This study investigated the association between daily air pollution exposure and respiratory symptoms among participants with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), using a unique dataset passively collected by digital sensors monitoring inhaled medication use. The aggregated dataset comprised 456,779 short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) puffs across 3,386 people with asthma or COPD, between 2012 and 2019, across the state of California. Each rescue use was assigned space-time air pollution values of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), fine particulate matter with diameter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5) and ozone (O3), derived from highly spatially resolved air pollution surfaces generated for the state of California. Statistical analyses were conducted using linear mixed models and random forest machine learning. Results indicate that daily air pollution exposure is positively associated with an increase in daily SABA use, for individual pollutants and simultaneous exposure to multiple pollutants. The advanced linear mixed model found that a 10-ppb increase in NO2, a 10 µg m-3 increase in PM2.5, and a 30-ppb increase in O3 were respectively associated with incidence rate ratios of SABA use of 1.025 (95 % CI: 1.013-1.038), 1.054 (95 % CI: 1.041-1.068), and 1.161 (95 % CI: 1.127-1.233), equivalent to a respective 2.5 %, 5.4 % and 16 % increase in SABA puffs over the mean. The random forest machine learning approach showed similar results. This study highlights the potential of digital health sensors to provide valuable insights into the daily health impacts of environmental exposures, offering a novel approach to epidemiological research that goes beyond residential address. Further investigation is warranted to explore potential causal relationships and to inform public health strategies for respiratory disease management.

Global Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Through 2050.

Importance: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory condition that is associated with significant health and economic burden worldwide. Previous studies assessed the global current-day prevalence of COPD, but to better facilitate resource planning and intervention development, long-term projections are needed. Objective: To assess the global burden of COPD through 2050, considering COPD risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this modeling study, historical data on COPD prevalence was extracted from a recent meta-analysis on 2019 global COPD prevalence, and 2010 to 2018 historical prevalence was estimated using random-effects meta-analytical models. COPD risk factor data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease database. Main Outcomes and Measures: To project global COPD prevalence to 2050, generalized additive models were developed, including smoking prevalence, indoor and outdoor air pollution, and development indices as predictors, and stratified by age, sex, and World Bank region. Results: The models estimated that the number of COPD cases globally among those aged 25 years and older will increase by 23% from 2020 to 2050, approaching 600 million patients with COPD globally by 2050. Growth in the burden of COPD was projected to be the largest among women and in low- and middle-income regions. The number of female cases was projected to increase by 47.1% (vs a 9.4% increase for males), and the number of cases in low- and middle-income regions was expected to be more than double that of high-income regions by 2050. Conclusions and Relevance: In this modeling study of future COPD burden, projections indicated that COPD would continue to affect hundreds of millions of people globally, with disproportionate growth among females and in low-middle income regions through 2050. Further research, prevention, and advocacy are needed to address these issues so that adequate preparation and resource allocation can take place.

The association between food environment, diet quality and malnutrition in low- and middle-income adult populations across the rural-Urban gradient in Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: Economic reforms and trade liberalisation in Vietnam have transformed the food environment, influencing dietary patterns and malnutrition status. The present study focuses on the relationship between food environments (proximity and density of food outlets) and malnutrition (underweight, overweight, obesity) through diet quality in adult populations across urban, periurban and rural areas of Vietnam. METHODS: We evaluated food environment by geospatial mapping of food outlets through a transect walk across the "food ecosystem" from rural to urban areas. Diet quality was assessed using the Diet Quality Index - Vietnamese (DQI-V) comprising Variety, Adequacy, Moderation and Balance components. Malnutrition status was determined using body mass index. We performed a mediation analysis utilising mixed effect models to control for neighbourhood clustering effects. Confounders included age, education, income and nutrition knowledge score. RESULTS: Analysis of data from 595 adult participants (mean ± SD age: 31.2 ± 6.4 years; 50% female) found that longer distance to the nearest food outlet was associated with higher overall DQI-V (ß = 2.0; 95% confidence interval = 0.2-3.8; p = 0.036) and the Moderation component (ß = 2.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.2-4.0; p = 0.001). Outlet density shows a negative association with the odds of underweight among women (odds ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.96). However, we did not observe statistically significant relationships between diet quality and malnutrition. Education and nutrition knowledge scores were positively associated with diet diversity, while income was negatively associated with diet moderation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have important implications for nutrition and dietetics practice in Vietnam and globally. It emphasises the need to consider various dimensions of sustainable diets, including economic, health and socio-cultural/political factors. Longer distances to food outlets are associated with higher diet quality, whereas lower food outlet density increases the odds of underweight among women. This poses challenges in balancing modernisation and its adverse effects on sustainable food systems. Socio-economic status consistently correlated with diet quality and malnutrition, necessitating further research to promote healthy diets across socio-economic strata.

Diet Quality Index and Food Choice Motives in Vietnam: The Roles of Sensory Appeal, Mood, Convenience, and Familiarity.

Food choices that shape human diets and health are influenced by various socio-economic factors. Vietnam struggles to meet many nutrition targets where links between food choice and diet have not been widely explored. This study assesses the food choice motives, based on a 28-item food choice questionnaire (FCQ), and the diet quality of 603 adults in three sites (urban, peri-urban, and rural) in northern Vietnam. We assess diet quality using the Diet Quality Index-Vietnam (DQI-V) which consists of variety, adequacy, moderation, and balance components. Using factor analysis, we grouped FCQ items into five factors: health focus, sensory appeal, mood ethics, convenience, and familiarity. The structural equation modeling indicates that food choice motives significantly impact the DQI-V and its components but in different directions. The results show that sensory appeal has a positive association with the overall DQI-V score, while having a negative impact on the variety component. Findings present a potential trade-off issue for interventions and policies related to food products. Nutrition knowledge is positively associated with all elements of diet quality across all three study sites. Vietnamese agrobiodiversity could be better utilized to increase dietary diversity. Differentiated policies are necessary to address the poor dietary diversity and adequacy in northern Vietnam.

Retrospective assessment of a collaborative digital asthma program for Medicaid-enrolled children in southwest Detroit: reductions in short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use.

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence for digitally-supported asthma programs among Medicaid-enrolled children remains limited. Using data from a collaborative quality improvement program, we evaluated the impact of a digital intervention on asthma inhaler use among children in southwest Detroit. METHODS: Children (6-13 years) enrolled with Kids Health Connection (KHC), a program involving home visits with an asthma educator, were invited to participate in a digital self-management asthma program (Propeller Health). Patients were provided with a sensor to capture short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use, and given access to a paired mobile app to track usage. Patients' healthcare providers and caregivers ("followers") were invited to view data as well. Retrospective paired t-tests assessed change in mean SABA use and SABA-free days (SFD) over time, and regressions explored the relationship between followers and medication use. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were assessed. Mean program participation was nine months, and patients had on average 3 followers. From the first to last participation month, mean SABA use decreased from 0.68 to 0.25 puffs/day (p < 0.001), and mean SFD increased from 25.2 to 28.1 days/month (p < 0.001). 76% of patients had an increase in the number of SFD. There was a positive, but non-significant, relationship between the number of followers and reductions in SABA inhaler use. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant reduction in SABA inhaler use and an increase in the number of SABA-free days among Medicaid-enrolled children enrolled in a multi-modal digital asthma program.

Relationship between Self-reported Sleepiness and Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first-choice treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, its real-world effectiveness is often questioned because of usage issues. The relationship between patient sleepiness and PAP usage has been assessed in relatively small and selected populations within the research context. Objectives: To assess the impact of patient-reported sleep outcomes, particularly self-reported sleepiness and its change during therapy, on PAP usage in the real-world setting. Methods: Deidentified data for U.S.-based patients receiving PAP therapy were examined. Eligible patients were registered in the myAir app and provided self-reported sleepiness at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of PAP between November 2019 and April 2020. Results: A total of 95,397 registered patients met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (mean age, 49.6 ± 13.0 yr; 61.6% male). Daytime sleepiness was the most common reason for PAP therapy initiation (57.1% of patients), and 42.2% of all patients had self-reported moderate to severe OSA. Self-reported sleepiness improved with PAP therapy in most patients over the assessment period, with 62.1% of patients reporting "no" or "slight" sleepiness at Day 28. There was a dose-dependent association between improvement in self-reported sleepiness at Day 28 and PAP usage, and this finding was maintained at Day 360. Self-reported sleepiness at Day 28 was associated with achieving U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services compliance at 90 days (approximately 90% for those with no or slight sleepiness vs. <70% for those with residual very or extreme sleepiness); average daily PAP usage over 360 days was ⩾5.0 and ⩽3.7 hours, respectively, for those with no or slight versus very or extreme sleepiness. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of capturing patient-reported outcomes via a digital platform. Patient-reported outcomes appear to be associated with PAP usage, especially self-reported sleepiness and its response to therapy. Capturing patient-reported outcomes using digital solutions during the course of treatment has the potential to enhance patient outcomes by providing actionable insights.

Is Once Versus Twice Daily Dosing Better for Adherence in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be prescribed once- or twice-daily dosing of controller inhalers. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in controller adherence by dosing schedule and age. METHODS: Electronic medication monitors (EMMs) captured the date and time of inhaler actuations over 90 days in patients using the Propeller Health platform. Prescribed inhaler schedule was self-reported. Once- versus twice-daily schedule comparisons were assessed retrospectively using regressions adjusting for age. RESULTS: A total of 6294 patients with asthma and 1791 patients with COPD were included. On average, once-daily users had significantly higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) daily adherence than twice-daily users (asthma: 63.3 [IQR: 31.1, 86.7]% vs 50.3 [IQR: 21.1, 78.3]%, P < .001; COPD: 83.3 [IQR: 57.2, 95.6]% vs 64.7 [IQR: 32.8, 88.9]%, P < .001). This pattern persisted in all age groups, with the exception of 4- to 17-year-olds in asthma. The lowest adherence was in the young adult population (18- to 29-year-olds). The percentage of patients who achieved ≥80% adherence was significantly higher among once- versus twice-daily users in asthma (34.3% vs 23.6%, P < .001) and COPD (54.8% vs 38.6%, P < .001). The adjusted odds of once- versus twice-daily users achieving ≥80% adherence was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.19-1.56, P < .001) in asthma and 1.73 (95% confidence interval: 1.38-2.17, P < .001) in COPD. Most once-daily patients with COPD took their medication in the morning versus at night; there was no difference in morning versus afternoon/evening administration in all other asthma and COPD groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with asthma and COPD who were prescribed once-daily versus twice-daily medications were more likely to adhere to their inhalers. Patients with COPD had higher adherence than those with asthma, possibly reflecting, in part, the older cohort age. The effect of greater adherence on exacerbations is a topic for future analysis.

Medication Adherence and Asthma Control with Once-Daily Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium/Mometasone Furoate Breezhaler Digital Companion: 90-Day Analysis from Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled asthma therapy is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Digital companion paired inhaler devices record medication use and provide reminders, thereby improving treatment adherence and asthma outcomes. This analysis assessed the impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium/mometasone furoate (IND/GLY/MF) Breezhaler® digital companion on medication adherence and symptom control in adults with asthma from Germany. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included adults (≥ 18 years) with asthma and prescribed Breezhaler digital companion. Assessments included: mean medication adherence (number of puffs taken/prescribed × 100) and change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores [well controlled (≥ 20), not well controlled (15-20) and poorly controlled (≤ 15)] at 1 month after the first ACT (second ACT). The percent of patients with ≥ 80% medication adherence (days 16-30 and 76-90) and the change in ACT (baseline and ≥ 30 days) were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with 90 days data, ≥ 80% medication adherence was achieved in 82.8% and 72.4% of patients at months 1 and 3, respectively. Change in asthma control was examined in ~ 60% (n = 97) of patients who completed ≥ 2 ACTs through the application. At baseline, 33.0% of patients were well controlled and 53.6% were well controlled at second ACT. Furthermore, 43.3% patients reported very poor control at baseline which decreased to 22.7% at second ACT. CONCLUSION: The use of IND/GLY/MF (Breezhaler) with a digital companion (sensor + application) may be associated with improved symptom control and high level of controller medication adherence in patients with asthma.

Improvement in symptom-related disruptions is associated with fewer days of short-acting beta-agonist use in asthma.

Significant indirect healthcare costs are related to uncontrolled asthma, including productivity loss. Days with short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) use is associated with symptom-related disruptions at work, home, and school. Digital self-management platforms may support fewer days with SABA medication use and may reduce symptom-related disruptions.