Predictors for Distal Revascularization Following Femoral Endarterectomy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the clinical variables which are predictive for the benefit of concomitant distal revascularization (DR) to prevent Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) progression and the need for major limb amputation. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with lower limb ischemia and required at least femoral endarterectomy (FEA), recruited over a period of 15 years (2002-2016). The patient cohort was divided into three groups based on the type of intervention: A (FEA alone), B (FEA + catheter-based intervention/(CBI)), and C (FEA + surgical bypass (SB)). The primary endpoint was to identify independent predictors for the use of concomitant DR (CBI or SB). Secondary endpoints were amputation rate, length of stay, mortality rate, postoperative ankle-brachial index and complications, readmission rate, re-intervention rate, resolution of symptoms and wound status. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included, 68.0% were males. Most presenting limbs were at Rutherford class (RC) III and WIfI stage 2, with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of .47 ± .21 and a TASC II class C lesion. No significant differences were found in the primary-assisted and secondary patency rates between the three groups (P > .05, in all). In the multivariate analyses, clinical variables associated with DR were hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1-2.2), TASC II D (HR 2.62), Rutherford class 4 (HR 2.3) and 5 (HR 3.7), as well as WIfI stage ≥3 (HR 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral endarterectomy is sufficient to treat intermittent claudication. However, patients in whom rest pain, tissue loss or TASC II D anatomic lesion severity are present may benefit from concomitant distal revascularization. Taking into consideration the overall assessment of operative risk factors for each individual patient, proceduralists should have a lower threshold for performing early or concomitant distal revascularization to reduce CLTI progression including additional tissue loss and/or major limb amputation.

A simplified approach to minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the feasibility of a simplified approach for the use of a rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) assay based on a single 10-minute post-excision level using the workup parathyroid hormone level (wPTH) as the baseline in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and to compare the predictive value of this criterion with other recommended criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. METHODS: A single surgeon's prospectively maintained parathyroidectomy database at an academic center was reviewed over a 2-year period from June 2009 through June 2011. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients undergoing MIP met the inclusion criteria. An IOPTH threshold of a ≥ 50% drop at 10 minutes post-excision from the wPTH baseline resulted in acceptable false positive (1.9%) and false negative (0.9%) rates. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of this modified criterion was 98.9%, 71.4%, 98%, 83.3%, and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, the pre-incision and pre-excision IOPTH levels did not seem to change the overall accuracy of predicting surgical success in MIP if a single 10-minute post-excision IOPTH level is used along with the wPTH, and is commensurate with the commonly used Miami and Vienna criteria. A single intraoperative blood sample demonstrating a ≥50% drop from the wPTH at 10 minutes post-excision should be explored further as a feasible simplified criterion that avoids multiple IOPTH samples.