Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33720803

ABSTRACT

Measurement of skin exposure to particles using interception (e.g., cotton gloves) and removal (e.g., wiping) sampling techniques could be inaccurate because these substrates do not have the same topography and adhesion characteristics as skin. The objective of this study was to compare particle transfer and adherence to cotton gloves, cotton gloves with artificial sebum, and a pre-moistened polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) material with bare human skin (fingertip, palm). Experiments were performed with aluminum oxide powder under standardized conditions for three types of surfaces touched, applied loads, contact times, and powder mass levels. In the final mixed model, the fixed effects of substrate, surface type, applied load, and powder mass and their significant two-way interaction terms explained 71% (transfer) and 74% (adherence) of the observed total variance in measurements. For particle mass transfer, compared with bare skin, bias was -77% (cotton glove with sebum) to +197% (PVA material) and for adherence bias ranged from -40% (cotton glove) to +428% (PVA material), which indicated under- and over-sampling by these substrates, respectively. Dermal exposure assessment would benefit from sampling substrates that better reflect human skin characteristics and more accurately estimate exposures. Mischaracterization of dermal exposure has important implications for exposure and risk assessment.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Skin/metabolism , Specimen Handling , Adhesiveness , Aluminum Oxide/analysis , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Aluminum Oxide/metabolism , Cotton Fiber , Humans , Polyvinyl Alcohol/chemistry , Powders/analysis , Powders/chemistry , Powders/metabolism , Skin Absorption
2.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 34(2): 113-124, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332440

ABSTRACT

Preterm birth remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality during the perinatal and neonatal periods. Now affecting approximately 1 in 10 births in the United States, preterm birth often occurs spontaneously and without a clear etiology. Careful assessment of risk factors, however, identifies vulnerable women allowing targeted interventions such as progestogen therapy and cerclage. This article is intended to highlight preterm birth risk factors and current predictive and preventive strategies for midwives, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and perinatal nurses.


Subject(s)
Neonatal Nursing , Nurse's Role , Premature Birth , Preventive Medicine , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Nursing/methods , Neonatal Nursing/standards , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Preventive Medicine/methods , Preventive Medicine/standards , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
3.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 20(3): 220-34, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25000110

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Factors that influence exposure to silver particles from the use of textiles are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of product treatment and physiological factors on silver release from two textiles. METHODS: Atomic and absorbance spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) were applied to characterize the chemical and physical properties of the textiles and evaluate silver release in artificial sweat and saliva under varying physiological conditions. One textile had silver incorporated into fiber threads (masterbatch process) and the other had silver nanoparticles coated on fiber surfaces (finishing process). RESULTS: Several complementary and confirmatory analytical techniques (spectroscopy, microscopy, etc.) were required to properly assess silver release. Silver released into artificial sweat or saliva was primarily in ionic form. In a simulated "use" and laundering experiment, the total cumulative amount of silver ion released was greater for the finishing process textile (0·51±0·04%) than the masterbatch process textile (0·21±0·01%); P<0·01. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the process (masterbatch vs finishing) used to treat textile fibers was a more influential exposure factor than physiological properties of artificial sweat or saliva.


Subject(s)
Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Occupational Exposure , Saliva/chemistry , Silver/analysis , Skin Absorption , Sweat/chemistry , Textile Industry , Environmental Monitoring , Laundering , Polyesters/chemistry , Textiles/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL