Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12658, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830895

ABSTRACT

The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination compared with those of FTD/TPI monotherapy in patients with AGC. We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with AGC who received FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab or FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatment. This study included 36 patients treated with FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab and 70 patients receiving FTD/TPI monotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 25.8% and 58.1%, respectively, in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group and 5.0% and 38.3%, respectively, in the FTD/TPI group (ORR, P = 0.007; DCR, P = 0.081). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group (median PFS, 2.9 vs. 1.8 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; P = 0.001). A numerical survival benefit was also observed (median overall survival, 7.9 months vs. 5.0 months; HR: 0.68, P = 0.089). In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly longer in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group than in the FTD/TPI monotherapy group (HR: 0.61, P = 0.030). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group than in the FTD/TPI group (13.8% vs. 2.9%); however, no new safety signals were identified. Compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy, FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab offers clinical benefits with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with AGC. Further investigation via randomized trials is warranted to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Drug Combinations , Pyrrolidines , Ramucirumab , Stomach Neoplasms , Thymine , Trifluridine , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Trifluridine/therapeutic use , Trifluridine/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Pyrrolidines/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Uracil/therapeutic use , Uracil/administration & dosage , Progression-Free Survival
2.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst ; 35(1): 40, 2023 Dec 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093170

ABSTRACT

Trousseau syndrome is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a risk of poor prognosis. We reviewed the survival time and prognosis of patients with Trousseau syndrome. We identified 40 cases from 28 reports of Trousseau syndrome due to pancreatic cancer. We analyzed 20 cases based on reports providing sufficient information on the stage/location of pancreatic cancer and survival time after Trousseau syndrome. The median survival time was 2.0 months. There was no statistical difference between performance status (PS) 0-1 and PS 4, stages I-III and IV, and pancreatic head and body/tail. However, statistically significant differences were noted between the median survival time of patients who continued treatment for pancreatic cancer even after Trousseau syndrome and those who discontinued treatment (P = 0.005). Although only a small number of cases were analyzed in this study, the results indicated that patients with pancreatic cancer who developed Trousseau syndrome had a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy should be continued, if possible.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Japan , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Syndrome , Case Reports as Topic
3.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 22(3): 298-306, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recommended first-line chemotherapy for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is bevacizumab (BEV)-containing therapy for right-sided colon cancer (R) and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody (anti-EGFR)-containing therapy for left-sided colon cancer (L) or rectal cancer (RE). However, anatomical or biological heterogeneity reportedly exists between L and RE. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies for L and RE, respectively. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 265 patients with KRAS (RAS)/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR or BEV as the first-line treatment at a single institution. They were divided into 3 groups: R, L, and RE. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and conversion surgery rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had R (anti-EGFR/BEV: 6/39), 137 patients had L (45/92), and 83 patients had RE (25/58). In patients with R, both median (m) PFS and OS were superior with BEV therapy (mPFS, anti-EGFR vs. BEV: 8.7 vs. 13.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.90, P = .01; mOS, 17.1 vs. 33.9 months, HR: 1.54, P = .38). In patients with L, better mPFS and comparable mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 20.0 vs. 13.4 months, HR: 0.68, P = .08; mOS, 44.8 vs. 36.0 months, HR: 0.87, P = .53), whereas, in patients with RE, comparable mPFS and worse mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 17.2 vs. 17.8 months, HR: 1.08, P = .81; mOS, 29.1 vs. 42.2 months, HR: 1.53, P = .17). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies may differ between patients with L and RE.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
4.
Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi ; 119(2): 147-152, 2022.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35153264

ABSTRACT

A 61-year-old patient with advanced gastric cancer was treated with ramucirumab plus albumin-suspended paclitaxel as second-line treatment. The treatment resulted in exposure of the right mandible around an implant. The implant was removed, and sequestration was not observed. The patient was diagnosed with oral mucosal necrosis. Thus, implants may cause mucosal necrosis due to angiogenesis inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Albumins/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Necrosis , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ramucirumab
5.
Int Cancer Conf J ; 10(4): 266-273, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34567936

ABSTRACT

Since colorectal metastases from primary lung cancer are rare, the location of metastatic lesion and prognostic factors have not been well evaluated. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of Japanese patients with colorectal metastasis from lung cancer. We searched the Ichushi-Web database from January 1964 to December 2020. We found 59 colorectal metastases in 52 cases for this meta-analysis. Small cell carcinoma was shown to have significantly more metastases to the appendix than non-small cell carcinoma. However, there was no significant correlation between location and histology when classified into right and left colons (P = 0.247). The median overall survival after diagnosis was 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that adenocarcinoma (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.383, P = 0.024), simultaneous metastasis (HR 0.325, P = 0.046), and chemotherapy group (HR 0.482, P = 0.044) were good prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that chemotherapy (HR 0.38, P = 0.02) was an independent good prognostic factor for overall survival. In conclusion, although there was no statistical difference, right colon metastases were more frequent than left colon metastases. Chemotherapy may be effective for colorectal metastases from lung cancer.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL