Outcomes of poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilizers with multiple myeloma at the first mobilization: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important therapeutic strategy for multiple myeloma; however, a proportion of patients fail to mobilize a sufficient number of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to proceed to ASCT. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of poor mobilizers. Clinical data on poorly mobilized patients who underwent PBSC harvest for almost 10 years were retrospectively collected from 44 institutions in the Japanese Society of Myeloma (JSM). Poor mobilizers were defined as patients with less than 2 × 106/kg of CD34+ cells harvested at the first mobilization. The proportion of poor mobilization was 15.1%. A sufficient dataset including overall survival (OS) was evaluable in 258 poor mobilizers. Overall, 92 out of 258 (35.7%) poor mobilizers did not subsequently undergo ASCT, mainly due to an insufficient number of PBSCs. Median OS from apheresis was longer for poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT than for those who did not (86.0 vs. 61.9 mon., p = 0.02). OS from the diagnosis of poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT in our cohort was similar to those who underwent ASCT in the JSM database (3y OS rate, 86.8% vs. 85.9%). In this cohort, one-third of poor mobilizers who did not undergo ASCT had relatively poor survival. In contrast, the OS improved in poor mobilizers who underwent ASCT. However, the OS of extremely poor mobilizers was short irrespective of ASCT.

Prognostic impact of complex karyotype on post-transplant outcomes of myelofibrosis.

Chromosomal abnormalities in the role of prognostic factor for transplant patients with myelofibrosis (MF) are not fully investigated. Regarding complex karyotype (CK), we retrospectively analyzed 241 patients with primary and secondary MF who received a first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Based on an unfavorable karyotype in the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, we compared the outcomes in 3 groups: favorable karyotype, unfavorable karyotype including CK (unfavorable-CK(+)), and unfavorable karyotype not including CK (unfavorable-CK(-)). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the unfavorable-CK(+) group (hazard ratio (HR) 2.49, 95% CI: 1.46-4.24, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between the unfavorable-CK(-) group and the favorable group (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.20-1.59, P = 0.28). In addition, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the unfavorable-CK(+) group did not achieve complete remission after HCT (P = 0.007). The cumulative incidence of disease progression was significantly higher in the unfavorable-CK(+) group (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.92, P < 0.001), whereas that in the unfavorable-CK(-) group was comparable to that in the favorable group (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.12-1.94, P = 0.31). Further investigations will be needed to clarify the impact of CK on transplant outcomes in MF.

Autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory PTCL-NOS or AITL.

Fit patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) in relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease status often receive salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) or allogeneic HCT (alloHCT). However, there is no consensus on the type of HCT that should be applied for such patients. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the survival outcome of 760 adult R/R PTCL-NOS or AITL patients who underwent the first HCT. Among them, 318 relapsed after first remission (REL) and 442 were refractory to the primary therapy (PIF). The 4-year overall survival (OS) of autoHCT and alloHCT was 50 and 50% for REL patients, and 52 and 49% for PIF patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, alloHCT tended to be associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) in REL (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-1.03), and significantly better PFS in PIF (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) compared with autoHCT. The subgroup analysis with propensity-score matching showed that alloHCT was associated with better OS for REL-sensitive and PIF-nonremission disease. This study suggested that the advantage of alloHCT for R/R PTCL-NOS or AITL is different, depending on the disease status at HCT.

Unsuppressed serum albumin levels may jeopardize the clinical relevance of the international staging system to patients with light chain myeloma.

The international staging system (ISS) is the most commonly used risk-stratification system for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is determined by serum albumin and ß2-microglobulin levels. In the two determinants, ß2-microglobulin levels are frequently observed to be elevated in patients with myeloma, particularly in those with renal impairment. In comparison with patients with intact immunoglobulin myeloma, patients with LC myeloma do not necessarily show decreased levels of serum albumin. The clinical impact of ISS in patients with LCMM, in particular the distinction between ISS I and II, may be complicated due to non-decreased levels of serum albumin in both stages. Accordingly, we have attempted to assess clinical relevance of the ISS in patients with LC myeloma. The clinical data of 1899 patients with MM diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2012 were collected from 38 affiliated hospitals of the Japanese Society of Myeloma. Significant difference was not found between stage I (n = 72) and stage II (n = 92) in LC myeloma patients (n = 307). The mean serum albumin concentration of patients with LC myeloma was within the reference range but higher than that of patients with IgG + IgA myeloma (n = 1501), which complicates the distinction between ISS stage I and II myeloma. Patients with LC myeloma had low frequencies of t(4; 14) and high frequency of elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and despite a relevant amount of missing data in our registry (R-ISS stage I; n = 11, stage II; n = 32, and stage III: n = 18), the information included in the R-ISS scoring system seems to be more accurate than ISS to obtain a reliable risk stratification approach in non-ISS stage III LC myeloma patients.

A pharmacokinetic study evaluating the relationship between treatment efficacy and incidence of adverse events with thalidomide plasma concentrations in patients with refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal disorder of plasma cells, accounting for 10% of hematologic malignancies. Relapsed or refractory MM has a poor prsognosis. Thalidomide has been reported to be effective for these patients; however, high-dose thalidomide has induced many adverse events, including in the nervous, gastrointestinal, and hematopoietic systems in approximately 20%-50% of patients. Recently, low-dose thalidomide therapy has been used in many countries in order to reduce these adverse events. The objective of this study was to determine whether plasma concentration of thalidomide is related to the efficacy and the development of adverse events in patients with refractory MM treated with low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients (age range, 40-74 years) presenting with progressive disease after previous treatments were treated with low-dose thalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Thalidomide was administered orally at 100 mg/day for the first week. When severe adverse events did not develop, the dose was increased to 200 mg/day in the second week and was continued until progression. Dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 4 mg/day for the first 4 weeks, then decreased by 1 mg every week, and finally maintained at 1 mg/day. Plasma trough concentration of thalidomide 3 days after thalidomide treatment was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography in 45 patients (age range, 42-74 years) who agreed to participate in this study of thalidomide concentration analysis. RESULTS: The mean concentrations at 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day were 0.343 microg/mL (range, 0.05-1.45 microg/mL) and 0.875 microg/mL (range, 0.19-2.09 microg/mL), respectively. The overall response rate (near-complete response + partial response + minimal response) of this treatment was 73%. Five had stable disease, and 3 patients experienced progressive disease. There was no relationship between the concentration of thalidomide in the plasma and the efficacy (P > .8). Severe adverse events, including grade > 2 nonhematologic and grade > 3 hematologic adverse events, were observed in 21 patients (46.6%). There was no significant difference in the concentration of thalidomide between the patients with and without severe adverse events (P > .843). CONCLUSION: The thalidomide concentration in the plasma does not predict treatment efficacy and the development of adverse events.

Low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma.

We report the results of a non-randomized phase II study of low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy in 66 patients with refractory multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (near complete, partial and minimal response) was 63.6%, and progression-free and overall survival periods were 6.2 and 25.4 months. In adverse events, the incidence of peripheral neuropathy and deep vein thrombosis was lower than the data reported in USA and Europe. On the other hand, leukopenia was observed in 41% of patients, including 11% of those with Grade 3. Leukopenia was closely related to pretreatment pancytopenia, especially thrombocytopenia. The incidence of adverse events related to dexamethasone was low. In conclusion, low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy was as effective as high-dose thalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone therapy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. Leukopenia is one of the most serious adverse events in Japanese patients, especially in patients with pretreatment pancytopenia.

[Thalidomide treatment of patients with refractory myeloma in the institutes participating in the Japan Myeloma Study Group].

Thalidomide was used in 73 patients with refractory myeloma in 15 of 45 institutes participating in the Japan Myeloma Study Group. The mean age and male/female ratio were 63.8 years and 0.92 (35/38), respectively. Thirty-four patients (47%) were treated with only thalidomide, 27 patients (37%) were treated with thalidomide and steroids, and 12 (16%) were treated with thalidomide and chemotherapy. The mean initial, maximum, and maintenances dose of thalidomide were 111.0, 204.8, and 163.0 mg/day, respectively. Almost all of the patients were maintained on low-dose thalidomide between 100-200 mg/day. Complete, near complete and partial response was obtained in 31 patients (42.5%). The progression-free and overall survivals after thalidomide therapy were 9.8 and 21.3 months, respectively. The most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal disturbance, peripheral neuropathy, psychological signs, and skin eruption. In contrast to reports from Europe and America, no deep vein thrombosis was observed in this study. On the other hand, leukopenia was relatively frequently observed, and might be recognized as a serious adverse effect in myeloma patients. In conclusion, low-dose thalidomide is a useful and safe tool for the treatment of refractory myeloma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: single institution experience with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIST) for interferon-alpha-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 26 patients referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital for possible RIST between June 2000 and April 2002, an HLA-identical relative was identified for 12 patients. Nine patients underwent RIST. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 180 mg/m2 or cladribine 0.66 mg/kg, plus busulfan 8 mg/kg and rabbit antithymocyte globulin 5 mg/kg. Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporine alone. RESULTS: All patients achieved engraftment without grade III to IV nonhematologic regimen-related toxicity. All patients achieved complete donor-type chimerism without donor lymphocyte infusion by day 60. Four patients developed acute GVHD, and four developed chronic GVHD. One patient (11%) achieved partial response. As of July 2003, six patients were alive at median follow-up of 681 days. The actuarial overall survival rate was 89% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years. The overall survival rate tended to be higher in the 12 patients with a matched donor than in the other 14 patients without a matched donor (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION: Our RIST procedure is feasible without severe toxicity. The efficacy of RIST for RCC should be confirmed in phase II/III clinical trials.

Effect of continuous subcutaneous administration of a low dose of G-CSF on stem cell mobilization in healthy donors: a feasibility study.

We investigated the effects of low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the mobilization of stem cells in 6 healthy subjects. When G-CSF was administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion at a rate of 72 microg/day for 5 days, the numbers of white blood cells and granulocytes rapidly increased to maximal levels. CD34+ cells were mobilized to the peripheral blood in 3 days, and the maximal level was reached 4 or 5 days after the start of treatment. We attempted to determine whether the levels of mobilized stem cells that we could obtain using this method would be sufficient for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Two of the 6 subjects complained of mild bone pain 4 or 5 days after the start of treatment, but the pain did not affect their daily activities. Only 1 abnormal result (for serum alkaline phosphatase) was found in the laboratory data. The present preliminary results have provided us with a framework for a prospective study comparing low-dose continuous infusion with conventional mobilization procedures.